Ross Coulthart Drops New UFO Bombshell
The global conversation about unidentified anomalous phenomena is gaining momentum, with recent developments reflecting a serious approach from national governments. In a recent live stream event, Japanese officials outlined new proposals to strengthen their efforts in analyzing and identifying unexplained aerial encounters, while considering broader collaboration with international partners. This initiative, supported by voices from both within Japan and international experts, highlights an increasing demand for transparency and accountability surrounding these mysterious incidents.
The discussions also brought attention to the political challenges and security concerns tied to disclosure, especially the influence of powerful defense sectors and the risks faced by those advocating for greater openness. As public interest grows and government officials push for further investigation, the path forward may depend on careful policy decisions and the willingness of key leaders to address public concerns directly.
Key Takeaways
Japan is moving toward greater transparency on unidentified aerial phenomena.
Disclosure efforts face resistance and involve complex security considerations.
Calls for accountability are shaping the conversation around future transparency.
Japan’s Actions on Revealing UFO Information
Key Developments in Japan’s Parliamentary Group
Japan’s bipartisan Parliamentary League, led by former defense minister Yazuk Kazu Hamada, has initiated new efforts related to unexplained aerial events. On May 16, 2025, they highlighted a plan during a live discussion that included international experts. This group is taking practical steps to push UFO transparency higher on the country’s agenda.
Notable participants:
Yazuk Kazu Hamada (Chair, Parliamentary League)
Jen Nakatani (Former Defense Minister)
U.S. representatives and defense experts
Focus
Leadership
Objective
Details
Bipartisan approach, strong political support
Increase public and governmental awareness about UFO issues
Suggestion for a New UAP Intelligence Office
The group’s proposal includes plans to establish a specialized agency dealing with Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP). The aim is to improve analysis and identification of unusual aerial events in Japan’s airspace. This agency would focus on both research and operational readiness.
Key points:
Building institutional capacity for UAP detection
Streamlining intelligence-gathering related to UFOs
Ensuring organized, government-led investigation processes
The proposal emphasizes transparency and structured procedures, reflecting a shift toward direct engagement with the unknown.
Enhancing Japan–U.S. Cooperation
A central feature of the initiative is its call for stronger ties with U.S. agencies and specialists. The Japanese Parliamentary League stresses that international collaboration will foster better data-sharing and unified responses to aerial anomalies.
Purpose of collaboration:
Exchange intelligence and best practicesConduct joint research on UAPsBenefit from established experience of U.S. partners
By joining forces, both nations can advance shared knowledge and bolster their security capabilities relating to unidentified phenomena.
Prominent Figures Pushing for UFO and UAP Transparency
Christopher Mellon's Observations on Disclosure
Christopher Mellon highlights the significance of bipartisan cooperation and international collaboration for effective UFO and UAP investigation. He points to Japan's move to propose a dedicated agency as a meaningful step in enhancing both intelligence analysis and cooperation with the United States. He emphasizes the need for structured transparency to evaluate and, where appropriate, declassify information regarding unidentified anomalous phenomena.
Mellon underscores the following points:
The importance of a specialized agency to investigate UAPs
The role of international partnerships, especially between Japan and the U.S.
The establishment of mechanisms — such as review panels — aimed at responsibly balancing national security and public disclosure
Ross Coulthart's Analysis and Concerns
Ross Coulthart voices skepticism about the current direction of UAP disclosure, describing significant resistance within the national security community. He references conversations with high-ranking individuals and whistleblowers who express frustration about longstanding secrecy. Coulthart strongly advocates for increased accountability and transparent proceedings.
Key remarks from Coulthart:
Political leadership at the highest level is necessary for disclosure; without it, secrecy may persist for years
Discussion of fear among officials, including claims regarding presidential reluctance due to personal risk
Emphasis on public reckoning and the need for oversight, including the suggestion of a presidential review panel
Concern that secrecy is maintained not strictly for national security, but to conceal controversial programs, including those related to reverse engineering
"This has to be done in public. There has to be transparency. The public has to see accountability."
Eric Berles’ Work in Policy Initiatives
Representative Eric Berles is acknowledged for his legislative involvement and commitment to increasing UAP transparency. He works as part of a specialized caucus, collaborating with other lawmakers to put pressure on government agencies for disclosure. Although his caucus lacks the numbers to compel immediate action, Berles remains active in advancing legislative proposals for greater openness and the protection of whistleblowers within the UAP community.
Highlights of Berles' approach:
Legislative Focus
UAP Caucus Participation
Bipartisan Engagement
Support for Whistleblowers
Description
Active member advocating for declassification and oversight
Works across party lines to strengthen policy proposals
Backs efforts to protect those coming forward with UAP information
Berles is seen as a key advocate within Congress, continuing to push for reforms that would improve governmental transparency and allow credible witnesses to testify regarding unidentified phenomena.
Political and Security Consequences
Government Secrecy and National Security Issues
Secrecy around unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP) has become a significant national security issue. Some officials believe that the extensive classification of UAP-related information is motivated by national security concerns, particularly if advanced technology or weapon development is involved. These restrictions, according to several insiders, are also used as a justification to prevent the public and lawmakers from accessing key information.
There are military personnel and whistleblowers who have attempted to alert the Pentagon and Congress about these matters, yet their efforts have often met with dismissal or cover-up. This has generated frustration among those who believe the public deserves greater transparency and governmental accountability in dealing with UAP incidents.
Issue
Over-classification of evidence
Suppression of whistleblowers
National security justifications
Impact
Limits public oversight
Decreases transparency
Delays information release
Congressional UAP Working Group
A group of lawmakers in Congress has taken an active role in pushing for greater UAP transparency. This congressional working group, while respected by many, remains limited in influence due to insufficient support from key political leaders and party leadership. Efforts by this group include advocating for review panels and oversight mechanisms to address withheld records and classified findings related to UAPs.
Members of this group stress the need for a balanced approach, where certain sensitive details remain protected, but other important information is released to promote public understanding and oversight. The ability of this coalition to drive change, however, depends greatly on broader political backing.
Key Efforts by the Working Group:
Promoting declassification panels
Calling for public hearings and accountability
Pressing for bipartisan legislative support
Difficulties at the Highest Levels of Political Leadership
Securing involvement from top government officials has been an ongoing challenge. Some former and current presidents have reportedly been informed about UAP developments but have not prioritized public disclosure, often citing national security or other political considerations. Fears of personal and political risk have also played a role, with concerns expressed that speaking out might invite threats or undermine political agendas.
High-level reluctance has resulted in UAP topics being deprioritized or avoided, leaving major decisions in the hands of entrenched agencies and advisors. Calls for more direct executive action and the formation of independent panels for record review continue, but overcoming executive resistance remains a primary obstacle.
Summary Table: Leadership Challenges
Leadership Aspect
Low executive priority
Risk aversion among top officials
Dependence on influential backers
Consequence
UAP disclosure remains stagnant
Slows progress toward transparency
Limits effectiveness of advocacy
Public Accountability and Transparency
Importance of Presidential Documents Oversight
There is a focused push for a dedicated group to examine information about unexplained aerial phenomena that is held by government agencies. The intention behind this proposal is to ensure that no significant data is kept secret without proper justification. By having an independent review body, decisions on what can or cannot be shared with the public would not be left solely to those with a vested interest in secrecy.
A suggested model is a review panel with the authority to evaluate classified documents and make recommendations on which records should be released. This panel would consider both national security concerns and the public’s right to know. Proponents view this as an essential step to prevent excessive classification and to foster institutional accountability.
Review Panel Role
Review UAP files
Recommend declassifying
Justification for Secrecy
Allow legitimate protection
Prevent misuse of secrecy
Potential Outcome
Increase transparency
Public access to vetted information
Growing Demands for Greater Clarity and Oversight
Many inside and outside of government are making strong appeals for declassification and clear government oversight. Advocates argue that ongoing secrecy erodes public trust and allows mistakes or wrongdoing to go unchecked. They emphasize the need for government officials, including former and current leaders, to answer for decisions that have kept important information hidden.
The public and some officials believe there must be open hearings and direct accountability for those who have misled Congress, presidents, or the American people. Calls have been made to question key figures and to bring relevant facts to light in order to restore confidence in the political process. Ensuring transparency is viewed as a fundamental requirement for responsible governance.
Open hearings for key officials
Release of information unless clear harm from disclosure
Direct consequences for covering up or withholding information
Transparency and oversight are not just ideals; they are essential functions that support democracy and deter misuse of authority.
Effects of Defense Industry Power on UAP Secrecy
Early Origins of Secrecy Measures
Throughout history, the national security establishment has laid the groundwork for hiding information related to unidentified aerial phenomena. This began under leadership that sought to legally justify withholding sensitive data, especially when new technologies and non-human intelligence were involved. Key figures initiated policies intended to protect national interests, but these measures eventually evolved into long-term institutional secrecy.
Eisenhower publicly warned about the risks posed by the growing influence of defense contractors and military agencies. Ironically, such warnings coincided with decisions that set in motion decades of concealed activity and official cover-up operations.
Current Barriers to Transparency and Political Change
Today, the strong influence of defense, intelligence, and aerospace sectors presents major obstacles to open discussion and policy reforms. Efforts to release information typically face resistance from well-established interests within these industries. The impact is visible in political circles—where even high-level officials and presidents encounter pressure and disincentives to prioritize disclosure.
Some officials advocating for transparency describe pervasive fears and credible concerns about retaliation. There are reports of whistleblowers coming forward, only to be met with indifference or suppression. Lawmakers have pushed for mechanisms such as independent review panels, yet the defense establishment's hold remains a principal challenge.
Main Obstacles Identified
National Security Policies
Defense Industry Influence
Political Disincentives
Whistleblower Suppression
Description
Longstanding legal justifications for secrecy
Prioritizes weapons development over openness
Leaders face pressure not to address the issue
Insider testimony is often ignored or covered up
This ongoing dynamic keeps key facts hidden from the public, prolonging demands for transparency and accountability around UAP phenomena.
Individual Dangers and Firsthand Accounts
Risks Confronted by Notable Individuals
Several prominent figures involved in UAP investigations have reported severe personal dangers linked to their advocacy. For instance, national political leaders have allegedly felt threatened for considering public disclosures. There have been claims that these individuals, including high-profile leaders, experienced fear for their own safety if they attempted to reveal information about UAPs.
One specific allegation is that a leading political figure was warned that discussing UAP secrets might put his life at risk. This atmosphere of intimidation is suggested to be widespread among those closely engaged with UAP programs.
Individual
High-level Politician
Whistleblowers
Alleged Risk Faced
Fear for personal safety if revealing UAP details
Intimidation, risk to careers
Source of Pressure
Unspecified intelligence or security interests
Defense and security establishment
Firsthand Reports from UAP Insiders
Members and former participants of the UAP programs have given personal testimonies describing efforts to inform authorities and the public. Whistleblowers within these programs have reported that their attempts to alert higher officials or Congress have often been ignored or actively suppressed by key agencies.
According to these insiders, secrecy is frequently maintained not out of necessity for legitimate national security, but to shield unauthorized activities and technology development from public scrutiny. Whistleblowers have also expressed frustration at the lack of transparency, stating that they have gone through proper channels only to have the process subverted.
Whistleblower Statements:
Attempts to report to the Pentagon were met with cover-ups
Claims of being encouraged by superiors to share information publicly, with no legitimate reason given for continued secrecy
Testimonies indicate strong resistance from influential defense and intelligence sectors
"The people inside the program desperately want to testify. They have followed the rules, but the agencies covered it up and misled both Congress and the public."
These accounts underscore a pattern of institutional resistance to disclosure and persistent calls for public accountability from within the programs themselves.
Future Prospects for UAP and UFO Transparency
Recent developments highlight both progress and roadblocks in the push for greater government openness about unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP) and UFOs. Japan's bipartisan initiative, which suggests establishing a specialized UAP agency, demonstrates international momentum and points to deeper cooperation with the United States.
Challenges remain significant. Disclosure efforts in the United States face powerful opposition from national security institutions and entrenched interests. Leadership at the highest levels, including the president, has not prioritized transparency, partly due to concerns over national security, classified weapons programs, and institutional resistance.
Key factors shaping the outlook for greater transparency:
Lack of political prioritization at the federal level
Fear and risk for officials who might push for openness
Suppression and misinformation within defense and intelligence communities
Calls for mechanisms like a presidential records review panel to systematically address secrecy
Advocacy from current and former officials demanding public accountability
Prospect
International agency creation (Japan)
Presidential records review panel
Congressional advocacy
Considerations
Potential for global collaboration and shared standards
May provide structured process for declassification
Efforts hindered by insufficient political influence
Some steps—such as public hearings, independent panels, and the testimony of whistleblowers—may improve access to information. However, overcoming decades of secrecy and the influence of the defense establishment will likely require sustained public and political pressure. The possibility of responsible, incremental disclosure exists but is far from assured as long as deep-rooted obstacles remain.
