Jesse Michels Drops Wild Interview About Skywatcher & Jake Barber
Skywatcher, a technology-focused organization, has made headlines for its efforts to detect and interact with unidentified aerial phenomena using advanced platforms. With figures like Jake Barber leading the initiative, the company claims to have attracted a variety of UAP classes, reportedly witnessing unusual sky activity that has been monitored through a mix of radar, optical systems, and even helicopter pursuits.
Recent discussions highlight Skywatcher’s ongoing attempts to not only track these phenomena but also potentially recover physical materials or craft, bringing in outside perspectives from experts and testimonials from those involved in the operations. The company and its collaborators continue to push forward, aiming to present evidence that could answer longstanding questions about these mysterious encounters.
Key Takeaways
Skywatcher uses advanced technology to study and track UAPs.
Efforts are underway to recover and analyze physical craft or material.
Multiple expert opinions and firsthand reports contribute to the ongoing investigation.
Background on Skywatcher and Jake Barber
How Skywatcher Got Started
Skywatcher originated as a technology group focused on Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP). The initial team brought together individuals with interest and expertise in UAP detection, leading to the development of specialized technology aimed at observing these objects. Their equipment—built to generate various effects and carry out detection across three spectrums—has enabled the team to see and track UAPs with greater accuracy.
Technology highlights:
Multiple sensors, including radar and sware cameras
Instruments that operate across three spectrums
Binocular and naked-eye sightings reported
Key team members, such as the sonic lead, have documented repeated encounters. Some incidents involved UAPs responding directly to experimental technology, like the 'dog whistle,' sometimes resulting in multiple craft appearing or displaying evasive maneuvers visible from both ground and air. The Skywatcher team has even attempted to observe or retrieve physical evidence from these encounters, including aiming for a demonstration involving a specific craft, nicknamed "the egg."
Jake Barber: Leadership and Goals
Jake Barber serves as a central figure within Skywatcher, articulating ambitious objectives for the group. He has expressed confidence in their capacity to facilitate controlled landings of UAPs and hopes to achieve a public demonstration featuring one of these objects—potentially within a set timeline in 2025. His approach mirrors aggressive goal-setting, sometimes compared to high-profile technology leaders.
Jake Barber’s focus:
Achieving controlled UAP landings
Inviting experts and institutions to potential demonstrations
Emphasizing transparency if successful
Barber has also discussed possible retrieval of non-terrestrial materials and has been open about uncertainties inherent in the project. He acknowledges the complex nature of UAP encounters: some appear material, others may be non-physical or exhibit characteristics of plasmas or holograms. Although skepticism remains about the feasibility of landing and studying a craft, Barber’s vision continues to drive Skywatcher’s research and technology efforts.
Emerging Tools and Methods for UAP Surveillance
Next-Generation Sensing Systems
Cutting-edge surveillance systems have led to increased visibility and tracking of unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP). Teams have observed UAPs both with the naked eye and through enhanced optical equipment. Upgrades to detection platforms have produced a significant rise in observed activity and enabled closer tracking of multiple UAP classes.
Technology
Binoculars
Swear Cameras
Radar
Observational Benefits
Direct visual confirmation
Enhanced imaging capabilities
Tracks multiple UAP spectra
These systems are deployed together, maximizing the identification and following of aerial objects that previously went unnoticed.
Integration of Acoustic and Visual Instruments
Technical teams utilize both sonic and optical instruments to detect and study UAPs. Use of specialized audio devices—including those described as "dog whistles"—has been observed to coincide with increased UAP appearances. Experts report that certain UAPs emit detectable light, while others are more readily identified through their sonic signatures.
Key Technologies:
Sonic detectors for frequency-specific phenomena
Electro-optical cameras for light-emitting objects
Combined visual observation with advanced optics
This dual approach has proven effective in registering a broader set of aerial phenomena types.
Broad-Spectrum Monitoring and Pursuit
Modern tracking employs equipment capable of scanning across multiple spectrums, including optical, radar, and other forms of sensing. Three distinct spectrums are regularly used, allowing for identification, classification, and pursuit of UAP activity both from the ground and air. Aerial follow-ups, such as those using helicopters, complement ground-based observations for improved situational awareness.
Multi-Spectrum Capabilities:
Visual (naked eye, binoculars)
Radar (broad area, object movement)
Optical (light emission, detailed imaging)
Teams monitor UAP behavior patterns, noting evasive maneuvers and energy emissions, which are more effectively documented with these diverse simultaneous detection methods.
UAP Sightings and Categories
Identification of Distinct UAP Types
Observers have recorded various kinds of UAPs, each with specific characteristics. Some encounters involved seeing three separate types in a single day, which was unusual compared to previous years. Instruments like binoculars, visual observation, and radar have been used to confirm these differences.
A table below highlights key examples:
UAP Category
"Egg" (Class 9)
Manta Ray
Hornet
Class One
Description
Oval-shaped craft
Unspecified unique shape
Another distinct appearance
Most frequently observed
Notable Feature
Subject of landing hopes
Contrasts with "Egg"
Not directly described
Seen in large numbers
Some of these UAPs appear as solid objects, while others resemble plasma balls or may even be non-physical, such as holograms or plasmoids.
Trends in UAP Manifestation and Reaction
Patterns have emerged in the appearance and behavior of UAPs. For example, after activating certain detection technologies, UAPs were consistently drawn to the observers' location. In some cases, predictions about conflicts in the sky and the arrival of different UAP types proved accurate.
There have been instances where UAPs responded to human actions, such as evading helicopters or displaying energy emissions. During special activities for government observation, up to 200 UAPs appeared within a four-hour span, most of which belonged to a single category.
Key behavioral trends:
UAPs can evade pursuit both from the air and the ground
Some show signs of reacting to specific technologies
Encounters sometimes lead to claims of UAPs being struck by energy or crashing
These observations suggest a complex range of UAP types and adaptive behaviors during encounters.
Efforts to Retrieve and Recover Downed Craft
Commitments to Acquire UAP Technology
The team at Skywatcher, according to Jesse and his guests, expressed a strong intention to secure a physical unidentified craft. There was direct mention of a goal to land a specific object, referred to internally as the "egg," by mid-2025. This plan included hopes for a live demonstration that would involve institutional observers and potentially lead to a significant breakthrough in the study of unidentified aerial phenomena.
Timeline Target: First half of 2025
Objective: Land and retrieve the "egg" craft
Involvement: Key public and institutional figures to be invited for transparency
The language emphasized both urgency and uncertainty, with comparisons to other ambitious technological project timelines.
Conversation on Tangible and Intangible Craft
Not all reported UAPs are considered to be traditional craft made of conventional materials.
Some of the observed objects may be physical and capable of being reverse engineered if recovered.
Others may be non-physical, such as plasma phenomena, holograms, or even forms that dissipate or transform after landing.
The team acknowledged that historical crash retrieval of such objects, if it has occurred, has likely been confined to secretive programs.
Below is a summary table illustrating reported UAP categories:
Category
Physical Craft
Non-Physical
Unknown Outcome
Description
Possibly reverse-engineered objects
Plasma balls, holograms, plasmoids
Behavior undetermined after landing
Possibility of Revealing Evidence to the Public
Skywatcher set forth the possibility of a demonstration to display a recovered object to independent parties.
There is a plan to invite scientists and institutional representatives for verification.
The intended demonstration is positioned as a potential turning point, offering material evidence rather than speculation.
Team members are both hopeful and cautious, noting the challenge and unprecedented nature of achieving full public disclosure.
The team expressed that if such a demonstration could be arranged, it would answer foundational questions and potentially provide the clearest evidence to date concerning UAP technology.
Statements and Experiences Shared by the Skywatcher Team
Firsthand Reports from James Fowler
James Fowler recalls witnessing several Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) incidents. He specifically states that, throughout his time collaborating with Skywatcher, he and his team observed four occasions where UAPs appeared to crash.
He mentions observing three of these as "class one" events. During a 2023 operation carried out for a government entity, the team encountered approximately 200 UAPs in just four hours. Fowler emphasizes that the UAPs during this event behaved unusually, noting a marked difference compared to prior encounters.
Details from Fowler's Accounts:
Event Year
2023
Prior Years
Approx. UAPs Observed
~200
3 events
UAP Type
Mostly Class 1
Class 1
Notable Observations
Unusual behavior, appeared to crash
Apparent crashes, not just flybys
Fowler uses the word "believe" when describing these events, indicating both conviction and the complexity involved in verifying such incidents.
Insights from the Jesse Michaels Conversation
Jesse Michaels discusses several expectations and hopeful outcomes regarding the Skywatcher team's research. He references prior conversations with Jake Barber, mentioning that Jake confidently predicted an attempt to facilitate a UAP landing demonstration in the first half of 2025.
Michaels describes Jake’s goal to demonstrate this event publicly and potentially retrieve material evidence. The aim is to invite representatives from academic or institutional backgrounds to verify and witness the demonstration.
Summary Table of Notable Points from the Interview:
Claim / Plan
UAP landing demonstration attempt
Hopes to retrieve actual UAP material
Some UAPs may not be physical craft (e.g., plasma forms)
Timeline
First half, 2025
Ongoing
N/A
Who Made the Statement
Jake Barber (per Michaels)
Skywatcher team
Jesse Michaels, Team
Michaels remains open-minded about the feasibility of a successful retrieval or demonstration, stating that such an occurrence would be a significant step for the project. He acknowledges the challenges and underscores that some types of UAPs may not leave conventional material evidence due to their unusual characteristics.
Expert Insights and Background
Commentary from Dr. Steven Greer
Dr. Greer addresses ongoing debates about classified knowledge and technology held by government and aerospace sectors. He notes that official bodies may have possessed secret advancements in physics and specialized materials since at least the post-World War II period. In his view, these discoveries remain largely inaccessible to the public due to classification and corporate control.
He highlights the complexity of the topic by emphasizing that visible aerial phenomena, possible government projects, and theories about consciousness may not all be interconnected. Instead, multiple separate threads may exist, each with its own evidence and challenges for verification.
Key Points:
Claims regarding the existence of advanced physics and materials.
Cautions against expectations of a unified explanation for all UAP-related questions.
Points out that much of the observed activity is not confined to secret programs, as some occurrences are visible and documented by civilians.
Consequences of Specialized Physics Understanding
The existence of advanced knowledge in physics and materials, especially within private industry and defense, may have far-reaching effects. This knowledge isn’t necessarily disclosed to the general public, raising questions about transparency and scientific progress. Some experts suggest that classified work has directly influenced the development of technologies capable of detecting or even interacting with unidentified aerial phenomena.
Potential Impact Table
Area
Technology
Security
Public Awareness
Research Progress
Possible Effect
Improved detection and tracking tools
Restricted access to discoveries
Limited understanding
Slower mainstream scientific adoption
These implications shape ongoing discussions about whether breakthroughs in aerospace or related fields will become available for broader societal benefit.
Final Thoughts
The discussion centers on the activities and ambitions of individuals investigating UAPs, highlighting both technological advances and ongoing uncertainties. Multiple detection methods, such as radar and optical systems, have been implemented, resulting in clearer identification and tracking.
There is a focus on potential material retrieval, especially the hope for landing a particular class, referred to as "the egg." This has generated speculation about what might be demonstrated to the public and whether such an event could occur within suggested timeframes.
Observations mentioned include encounters with different UAP classes, unusual energy effects, and reports of crashes witnessed under unique circumstances. Unresolved questions about the nature and behavior of these phenomena remain, as does the challenge of capturing definitive physical evidence. The subject remains complex, with multiple threads contributing to a broader investigation.
