Dr. Beatriz Villarroel Comes Clean About NASA

What if the very skies above us were hiding more mysteries than we ever suspected? Every so often, new revelations pull us deeper into a rabbit hole of possible extraterrestrial visitors, secret government operations, and unexplained celestial phenomena. Recent discussions led by Patrick from Vetted delve into the persistent question: Are we being watched, and if so, who knows about it?

Unveiling the Hidden: NASA, Space Force, and Classified Targets

For decades, NASA has charmed us as the face of space exploration—a beacon for civilian scientific progress. Yet, behind the scenes, there's a tangled web involving military oversight, classified lists, and uncorrelated targets that have quietly slipped through the cracks of public awareness. While NASA occasionally dabbles in intelligence, it’s the U.S. Space Force, according to insider accounts, that manages secretive catalogues of anomalous objects spotted in Earth’s orbit. These so-called uncorrelated targets—meaning objects that don’t match any known satellites or debris—are methodically scrubbed from official records, never making it into public discourse.

The story traces back decades. As early as the 1960s, these uncorrelated objects have been quietly tracked, only to be dismissed as "noise" or filtered out as non-relevant data. But, as leading astrophysicist Dr. Beatatrice Val and her research reveal, dismissing these anomalies may have allowed decades of critical data to go unstudied. Val's investigations into pre-Sputnik photographic plates expose hundreds of thousands of transients—mirror-like, metallic-looking objects reflecting starlight where there should have been none. Peer-reviewed and scientifically rigorous, her work hints at possible nonhuman sensors, perhaps even UFOs, observing us since before the dawn of the space age.

The Classified Lists: Are We Erasing Evidence?

One of the video’s most intriguing themes is the notion that these uncorrelated targets aren’t just being ignored—they’re being classified and hidden. The rationale, as described, involves separating out targets that can’t be associated with known satellites to maintain clean datasets. Yet, by removing them, we might be erasing some of the most compelling evidence of unexplained aerial phenomena—data that could answer the very questions humanity has pondered for centuries.

Digging deeper, the hosts speculate: does NASA ever actually handle this data, or is it left entirely in the hands of military agencies? The implication is that Space Force—a much newer branch of the armed services—possesses lists of these objects dating back to the 1960s, and those lists are locked behind classified doors. As researchers yearn for access to these coordinates to verify their existence (or disappearance), it becomes clear that "noise" in astronomical data might actually be signposts to a whole new reality.

Historic UFO Accounts and the Quiet Redactions of History

This obsession with filtering the unexplained isn’t just a recent development. The transcript recounts a trail of historical breadcrumbs: In the early 1950s, long before Sputnik, Major Donald Kho and astronomer Dr. Lincoln Leaz claimed the military tracked unknown satellites orbiting Earth—years before we launched any artificial ones. These objects were described as shiny, metallic, even flat-bottomed—eerily similar to the characteristics found in both photographic plates and official government UFO documents of the time.

Yet, something deeply suspicious happened. Not only were the objects never officially acknowledged, but final government reports flatly denied the very possibility of their existence. These vanished records, along with unexplained gaps in NASA's official releases (sometimes blamed on government shutdowns or technicalities), foster an air of conspiracy that is hard to ignore.

Why Do We Keep Missing What’s Right in Front of Us?

The realities of orbital observation are sobering. Recent discoveries like Earth’s quasi-moon—2025 PN7, an 18 to 36-meter-wide object that orbited Earth for 60 years before its detection—reveal just how much can slip through even our most sophisticated monitoring systems. If something so massive and close could remain hidden in our technological blind spots for decades, the mind reels at what else we might be missing—or intentionally ignoring.

Skepticism and Hope: Where We Go From Here

Despite a healthy skepticism towards conspiracy theories, even seasoned observers admit that recent trends look increasingly troubling. Reports of NASA cutting live feeds when unexplained objects appear, unexplained delays in releasing public data, and firsthand accounts from government insiders working in top-secret capacities all lend weight to the suspicion that something significant is being withheld from the public eye.

Yet, hope persists amid the inquiry. Dr. Val’s work and the determined curiosity of independent investigators suggest that as long as there are people willing to ask difficult questions, the truth will continue to trickle into the light. Whether or not these uncorrelated objects are evidence of extraterrestrial surveillance, covert technologies, or elaborate bureaucratic error, the story underscores the necessity of transparency, rigorous science, and open dialogue.

What Should We Believe?

It’s easy to get swept up in these mysteries, but also vital to maintain a balanced perspective. Not every unexplained light in the sky points to alien intelligence. Still, the fact remains that for decades, significant data has been dismissed, hidden, or left unexamined. As technology advances and new evidence emerges, we may be on the edge of profound revelations about our place in the universe.

Your Turn: What Do You Think?

The quest for understanding is far from over. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, but curiosity and open-minded skepticism are our best tools. Have you witnessed something unexplainable in the sky? What should scientific agencies do with decades of anomalous data? Drop your stories and thoughts in the comments—because every perspective helps bring us closer to the truth.

At the end of the day, the search for answers persists, reminding us all that every day truly is a gift, filled with the potential for discovery.

EXCLUSIVE: New UFO Whistleblower Comes Forward

In a recently released Vetted interview, host Patrick sits down with an anonymous figure known as “Michael,” who claims to be the same individual former AARO Deputy Director Tim Phillips accused of attempting to extort the U.S. government over alleged UAP (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena) materials.

Phillips, during a podcast appearance earlier this year, described a witness who supposedly tried to sell physical UFO materials or threaten to take them to a foreign country — calling the situation “extortion.” Until now, the identity of that person remained a mystery.

Michael Speaks Out: “It Came Out of Left Field”

Michael denies all allegations, calling them “completely shocking” and “out of left field.” He claims that both his attorney and government contacts were blindsided when Phillips made the statement publicly.

“My phone was blowing up,” Michael said. “No one was expecting that — not me, not my legal team, not the people funding our work.”

According to Michael, he had legitimate dealings with Senate staff and had provided information related to UAP materials for official review. However, he alleges that critical documents were shredded before reaching a senator’s desk, effectively burying evidence that could have advanced UFO transparency efforts.

Behind Closed Doors: Shredded Files and Political Secrets

Michael’s account paints a troubling picture of how UAP-related information is handled at the highest levels of government.
He recounts an incident where a staff member allegedly disposed of a sensitive folder — first throwing it in the trash, then shredding it after realizing “it didn’t look good.”

“That’s your bombshell,” Michael told Patrick. “It never made it to the senator.”

This claim, if true, suggests internal suppression of UAP evidence — a topic that continues to fuel public distrust amid ongoing congressional investigations into UFO transparency.

The Bigger Picture: UFO Disclosure in 2025

The Vetted interview arrives at a critical time. With the UAP Disclosure Act and renewed focus on government transparency, this interview adds another layer of complexity.

If Michael’s story holds weight, it could indicate that key UAP data has been intentionally destroyed or hidden, echoing long-standing claims from other whistleblowers.

Why This Matters for the 2025 Disclosure Movement

As the U.S. government faces mounting pressure to declassify UAP information, testimonies like Michael’s raise serious questions about internal accountability.
The alleged shredding of evidence, misrepresentation of witnesses, and media manipulation could reshape how the public perceives UFO disclosure efforts in 2025.

Final Thoughts

Whether you believe Michael’s story or not, one thing is clear — the UAP debate is far from over. This Vetted interview may be just part one of a larger revelation that could expose how deep the secrecy around UFO materials truly goes.

Stay tuned as this story develops — and as more insiders step forward to challenge the official narrative.

Jeremy Corbell Comes Clean About 3i/ATLAS

In recent years, whispers from intelligence insiders and UFO researchers have converged around a single, chilling message:

“Something is coming in 2027.”

From Jeremy Corbell and George Knapp’s interviews to Dr. Garry Nolan’s shocking statements, the year 2027 has become a focal point in the ongoing UFO disclosure saga. But what exactly is supposed to happen — and why are so many credible voices hinting at it?

Patrick from Vetted dives deep into the claims, separating fact from speculation and exposing the psychological, governmental, and scientific layers behind this mysterious date.

The Origin of the 2027 Theory

The “2027” timeline first gained traction after Luis Elizondo, former head of the Pentagon’s AATIP program, hinted that a major revelation or event was expected within “five years.” That statement, made in 2022, pointed directly to 2027.

Since then, researchers like Corbell and Knapp have echoed similar warnings — suggesting that the government may be preparing society for a transformational disclosure involving non-human intelligence.

Patrick highlights that these claims aren’t random:

“When multiple insiders reference the same year, it’s either coordinated messaging — or the biggest coincidence in UFO history.”

What Could Be Coming in 2027?

There are three leading theories circulating in the disclosure community:

1. Gradual Disclosure:
   Governments may plan a staged release of evidence — including recovered craft or biological material — to acclimate the public to non-human intelligence.

2. Astronomical Event:
   Some speculate that a celestial object or interstellar probe (like ‘Oumuamua or the “Atlas Comet”) could return or become visible around 2027, reigniting public debate.

3. Psychological Operation:
   Others, including Corbell, warn that the “2027 event” could be a manufactured narrative — a way to manipulate global perception under the guise of alien contact.

Patrick leans toward the third possibility:

“If you control the story, you control the reaction. That’s what makes 2027 so dangerous — not what might come, but what we’re told is coming.”

The Government’s Quiet Preparation

Since 2023, the U.S. has established multiple UFO-related offices, including the AARO (All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office), which continues to collect and analyze UAP data.

In 2025, leaked briefings suggest that classified materials are being reviewed for public release by 2027 — aligning eerily with prior insider predictions.

Patrick notes that this timeline fits a pattern:

• 2021–2023: Acknowledgment of UAP reality

• 2024–2026: Controlled leaks and whistleblower testimony

• 2027: Full or partial disclosure event

Dr. Garry Nolan’s 2027 Statement

Stanford professor Dr. Garry Nolan added fuel to the fire when he said during a 2023 conference:

“An event is coming — something that will make it undeniable that we’re not alone. It will happen within five years.”

That single statement has become the cornerstone of the 2027 theory. Nolan later clarified that he was referring to a major societal shift, not necessarily an alien landing — but the seed was planted.

Patrick’s Analysis: Truth, Timing, and Misdirection

Patrick argues that 2027 may represent a psychological milestone, not an extraterrestrial one. By setting a date, intelligence agencies can control anticipation, fear, and belief — creating a “narrative countdown.”

“It’s not about aliens arriving — it’s about conditioning the public to expect something. That’s the real operation.”

He warns that even if a genuine discovery occurs, it will likely be filtered through government-approved channels designed to maintain control over the narrative.

What This Means for 2025 and Beyond

With AI-generated search results and social media algorithms amplifying UFO content, misinformation spreads faster than ever. The 2027 theory thrives in this environment — blending truth, speculation, and digital amplification.

Patrick concludes:

“Whether 2027 brings disclosure or deception, we’re already living in the age of narrative warfare. The only defense is awareness.”

Key Takeaways

• 2027 is widely referenced as a turning point in UFO disclosure.

• Insiders like Elizondo, Corbell, and Nolan have all hinted at a significant event.

• Theories range from government disclosure to psychological operations.

• 2025–2026 are critical years for information leaks and narrative control.

• The truth may not be what’s revealed — but why it’s revealed.

Ross Coulthart Drops UFO Bombshell

In late 2025, the scientific community was rocked by a pair of peer-reviewed studies that may change how we understand our place in the universe. The research, led by Dr. Beatrice Vodel, suggests that artificial reflective objects—possibly metallic or engineered—were orbiting Earth before the launch of Sputnik 1 in 1957, humanity’s first official satellite.

This isn’t science fiction. It’s peer-reviewed astrophysics, supported by data from archival photographic sky plates—long-exposure images of the night sky taken decades ago.

If verified, this could be the first credible evidence of non-human intelligence (NHI) operating in Earth’s orbit long before the space age began.

The Research: Mining the Past for Clues to the Unknown

Dr. Vodel’s team analyzed over 300,000 historical sky plates from major observatories, including the Palomar Sky Survey (1948–1957). These plates, captured on glass negatives, were designed to map the stars—but they also recorded fleeting events invisible to the naked eye.

During analysis, the team found transient linear light streaks—multiple bright points aligned in straight lines, consistent with reflections from structured, orbiting objects.

Key Observations from the Study:

• The events did not match known astronomical phenomena like meteors or satellites.

• The streaks were too consistent and too geometrically aligned to be random.

• The reflections appeared to move at orbital velocities, suggesting Earth orbit rather than atmospheric or cosmic origins.

In short: something artificial-looking was reflecting sunlight in orbit before humans had the technology to place anything there.

Peer-Reviewed and Published in Major Scientific Journals

This isn’t a fringe claim—it’s peer-reviewed science.

Two papers authored by Dr. Vodel and colleagues were accepted in 2025 by:

1. Scientific Reports (Nature Group) – Focused on the detection and classification of transient reflective events.

2. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific (PASP) – Explored implications for non-human artifacts and orbital archaeology.

Getting UAP-related research through peer review in these journals is nearly unprecedented. It marks a turning point in how mainstream science approaches the UAP/NHI question.

The Implications: What If These Objects Are Real?

If these reflective objects are confirmed to be artificial and pre-Sputnik, the implications are staggering.

We would be looking at:

• Evidence of non-human technology operating in Earth orbit decades before human spaceflight.

• A possible technosignature—a sign of intelligent engineering—within our own planetary system.

• A new scientific field: Orbital Archaeology, the study of ancient artifacts in near-Earth space.

Dr. Vodel has been careful to emphasize that the data does not prove alien origin, but it strongly suggests artificiality that cannot yet be explained by known physics or human activity.

Expert Reactions: From Skepticism to Serious Discussion

The research has sparked intense debate across the scientific community.

Dr. Brian Keating, astrophysicist at UC San Diego, commented:

“This is exactly what science should do—challenge assumptions with data. Whether these are artifacts, reflections, or something else entirely, we must investigate with open minds.”

SETI researchers have also expressed cautious optimism, noting that searching for technosignatures in historical data has long been proposed but rarely executed at this scale.

Meanwhile, skeptics urge caution, suggesting that plate defects, unknown atmospheric effects, or early classified experiments could explain some of the observations.

Still, the fact that two independent peer-reviewed studies reached similar conclusions is forcing even skeptics to take notice.

Could These Be Early Secret Satellites?

One of the most grounded hypotheses is that these objects might be classified military experiments predating Sputnik.

However, historians note that no records—even in declassified archives—show any evidence of orbital launches before 1957. The technology simply did not exist.

Rocket propulsion capable of achieving orbit wasn’t successfully demonstrated until Sputnik 1, launched by the Soviet Union on October 4, 1957.

That means if these objects were indeed in orbit in 1948–1956, they cannot be explained by known human activity.

The Search Continues: Where Are These Objects Now?

Dr. Vodel’s team is now collaborating with ESA and NASA researchers to re-scan the orbital regions identified in the study.

Using modern telescopes, radar, and AI-based orbital tracking, they hope to determine whether any of these reflective objects still exist—or whether they decayed naturally decades ago.

If found, these objects could become the first physical evidence of non-human intelligence in Earth orbit.

A Turning Point for UAP Science

For decades, the study of UAPs (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena) was dismissed as pseudoscience. But in recent years, the narrative has shifted.

Governments, defense agencies, and now mainstream scientists are acknowledging that some phenomena defy conventional explanation.

Dr. Vodel’s work bridges the gap between data-driven science and open-minded exploration, offering a model for how UAP research can be conducted credibly, transparently, and rigorously.

Why This Matters for Humanity

This discovery challenges our most fundamental assumptions:

• Are we the first intelligent species to reach orbit?

• Could ancient civilizations—or even non-human intelligences—have visited Earth in the distant past?

• What does it mean for our understanding of consciousness, evolution, and technology?

Even if these objects turn out to be natural or human-made, the process of investigating them is scientifically invaluable. It pushes us to re-examine old data with new tools, and to question what we think we know about our history.

SEO Insight: Why This Story Is Dominating Search in 2025

Search trends in 2025 show skyrocketing interest in:

• “Pre-Sputnik satellites”

• “Artificial objects in orbit before 1957”

• “Peer-reviewed UAP research”

• “Beatrice Vodel NASA study”

This reflects a growing public appetite for credible, data-backed UAP science—not speculation, but evidence-based discovery.

According to Locusolve’s 2025 SEO guide, long-form, research-driven content like this performs best when it:

1. Fully answers user intent (what, who, when, why).

2. Incorporates semantic keywords naturally.

3. Links to authoritative sources (NASA, Nature, peer-reviewed journals).

This article is structured to meet those standards—making it SEO-ready for Google’s 2025 algorithm.

Final Thoughts: A New Chapter in Human Curiosity

Whether these pre-Sputnik reflective objects are artifacts of non-human intelligence, ancient probes, or unknown natural phenomena, one truth remains:
Science is evolving to embrace the unknown.

Dr. Vodel’s courage to publish her findings—despite the stigma surrounding UAP research—has opened the door to a new era of data-driven exploration.

As Patrick from Vetted put it:

“We’re not chasing UFOs. We’re chasing truth—and the truth might be bigger than we ever imagined.”

Karl Nell Drops UFO Surprise

If you've been following the world of UFOs (or UAPs—Unidentified Aerial Phenomena) lately, you'll know it’s been a wild ride. From Navy videos hitting the headlines in 2017 to headline-grabbing whistleblowers and Congressional hearings, many believed we were on the brink of full disclosure: the moment when governments would level with the public about what they know about non-human intelligence. But if you caught Patrick from Vetted breaking it all down recently, there's a new reality to face—he and his expert guests think the recent wave of official disclosure might just be over. So what does that mean for the truth-seekers, the researchers, and everyone who still stares at the night sky, hoping for answers?

The End of the Latest Disclosure Wave

Patrick dives straight into the heart of the matter: according to retired Colonel Carl Nell, whose defense and intelligence background is as heavyweight as they come, the cycle of open disclosure that began around 2017 is finished. Nell, speaking at the 2025 Global Disclosure Day, pointed to stalled Congressional action—especially the defeat of the UAP Disclosure Act—and the increasingly repetitive nature of hearings and “revelations.”

Nell summarizes the situation: there was momentum, attention, and growing legitimacy for the UFO topic, but the mechanisms for real government transparency have stalled. Without Congressional accountability structures, he argues, the government is more likely to hunker down and go reactive, rather than become more open. It’s a “let’s take stock moment” for the entire movement.

Who Is Carl Nell—and Why Does His Opinion Matter?

If you're new to the field, you might wonder why Colonel Carl Nell’s words carry so much weight. When a guy with a resume that includes Army Space Command, advanced strategic roles at major defense contractors, and a stint advising the Army's UAP task force says something about government transparency—or its lack thereof—it’s worth listening.

Nell’s credibility is built on direct experience. He’s not just opining from the sidelines but has been deeply embedded in both military and intelligence communities, giving him real perspective not only on what’s possible, but what the institutional roadblocks actually look like.

Reflecting on Seven Years of Progress (and Stumbles)

But for every door that closes, another opens—or at least, that’s what disclosure watchers hope. Patrick points out, and guests like Richard Dolan echo, that even if the “official” disclosure movement faltered, it changed the game. The mainstreaming of the conversation, more open discussion in Congress, and a huge swell of content creators and citizen investigators are all signs of real cultural progress.

Dolan, a respected historian in the field, compares the current moment to earlier cycles: the burst of interest in the 1950s, the FOIA-driven 1970s, the Roswell revival of the ’90s, and more. Each time, public interest swelled, official investigations quietly fizzled, and activists regrouped. What’s different now, he says, is the unprecedented volume of public conversation and the fact that credible whistleblowers keep stepping forward—even if Congress can’t always catch the ball.

What’s Standing In the Way?

Among the most urgent issues: whistleblower protections and the need for more “firsthand witness” testimony. Guests like Kirk McConnell point out that there’s energy and interest in Congress, especially in the House, but the Senate holds out for direct witnesses tied to the so-called “legacy programs”—the secretive efforts to study and reverse-engineer potential non-human technologies. Without more credible insiders willing to come out (and solid protections for them), progress will continue to stall.

It’s a classic catch-22: whistleblowers fear for their livelihoods and legal safety, so they stay silent, while Congress says it can’t act without more testimony. The protections on the books are too weak to give people confidence to risk everything. Until that changes, large-scale, official revelations seem unlikely.

Where Do We Go From Here?

If it’s true that the cycle is over, does that mean the disclosure movement is doomed? Absolutely not. Instead, this might be a pivot point—a chance to re-evaluate approaches and build off the “failures” that actually moved the conversation forward. As the video’s host notes, every movement faces setbacks, but these gaps are where learning and adaptation happen.

The take-home message is clear: even if top-down, government-led revelation has hit a wall for now, the conversation isn’t dying—it’s evolving. Grassroots efforts, independent research, more content and visibility, and rising demand for transparency all mean the story isn’t finished. The next phase will demand greater focus on whistleblower support, stronger calls for accountability, and perhaps, broader appeal to public interest and media. As history shows, each cycle lays the groundwork for the next push.

Everyday Observers and a Bigger Community

One of the most compelling segments in Patrick’s recap is from a regular viewer out in rural Nevada, sharing experiences of strange lights in the sky, unexplained movements, and a continued sense of wonder. It’s a reminder that the search for answers isn’t just about Congressional votes or “insider” leaks. It’s everyone’s story—a tapestry woven from citizen sightings, independent research, and conversations fueled by both skepticism and open-minded curiosity.

Ultimately, you don’t need a seat at the Pentagon to contribute. The broader community of everyday sky-watchers, passionate amateurs, and serious researchers keep the spirit of inquiry alive. And as more people speak out about their experiences, the pressure for more transparency continues to rise.

Conclusion: Disclosure Isn’t Dead—It’s Changing

As the dust settles on this cycle of government disclosure, it’s time for the community to take stock. Yes, some doors have closed—but others are opening in creative, unexpected places. The biggest advances might not come from official statements, but from tenacious citizens, tech-savvy content creators, and courageous insiders.

So stay curious and keep asking questions. Whether you’re analyzing witness testimony, raising awareness on social media, or just watching the skies with friends, you’re part of the next phase. Disclosure may not look like what we expected—but the truth, as always, is still out there.

Jesse Michels Drops UFO Bombshell

Curious about secret government projects, alien abductions, and telepathic communication? You’re in for a mind-bending read. Let’s dive into a story that’s capturing imaginations — and skepticism — across the internet.

Not Your Average Interview

Patrick from Vetted opens up from sunny Spain, sharing the latest buzz in the UFO community: an interview with Dan Sherman, a retired Air Force technical sergeant. Sherman’s story? It’s unlike anything you’ve likely heard.

Sherman claims he was part of Project Preserve Destiny, a top-secret NSA program in the 1990s. But that’s not even the wildest part. According to Sherman, his journey began before he was born, when his mother was allegedly abducted by aliens while pregnant. During this abduction, his genetics were supposedly altered—giving him the telepathic ability to communicate with extraterrestrials. The government, recognizing these unique skills, tracked him from a young age and eventually recruited him as one of their "intuitive communicators."

The Origins of the Intuitive Communicator

So how does one become an intuitive communicator? Sherman explains that the government collaborated, directly or indirectly, with extraterrestrials to genetically engineer certain individuals — in his case, the process started while he was still a fetus. The military then used demographic data to select likely candidates, focusing on people who’d probably join the armed forces and could be monitored closely. Sherman grew up, joined the Air Force, and was ultimately brought into the mysterious fold of Project Preserve Destiny.

Once recruited, Sherman claims he was trained to interpret telepathic signals from aliens, entering a world of classified projects and signals intelligence. Communication occurred in a way that felt physically different—he describes a sensation in his brain that was both foreign and unmistakable.

Classified Projects, Deep Cover, and the "Onion Effect"

One of the more fascinating points in this saga is the way the military and intelligence world compartmentalizes secrets. Sherman reveals a system of layers — "the onion effect" — where black projects (highly classified operations) cover for even more secretive "gray projects". Only a select few know the full story. Funding and resources are justified under the public-facing project, while behind closed doors, an even deeper secret is being guarded.

Sherman discusses how he experienced this firsthand: whisked to underground facilities, trained with special equipment, and exposed only to the information he needed to do his job — a classic example of "need to know". The result is a labyrinth of secrecy, designed to defend the most sensitive programs from leaks, internal snooping, and outside interference.

Fact or Fiction? The Skeptical Perspective

Patrick doesn’t take Sherman’s claims at face value, and neither do many commentators. The blog post explores the critical responses, with skeptics wishing for concrete evidence—PET scans, CTs, recordings of these telepathic sessions, or some undeniable proof.

Yet, the intrigue grows as well-documented veterans and journalists, like Walter Kern, share Sherman’s story with genuine interest. Notably, Sherman himself admits he never saw an alien and acknowledges that his experience could’ve been a sophisticated government experiment rather than true extraterrestrial contact. Authentic? Possibly. Verifiable? Not quite. But Sherman’s openness about his doubts just adds to the story’s credibility for many listeners.

Impact and Implications: If True, Everything Changes

What if Sherman’s account is accurate? As one guest commentator notes, such revelations would force humanity to reconsider history, science, religion, and politics. Acknowledging secret genetic engineering and ongoing contact with aliens would reshape our understanding of the world and our place in it.

Even skeptics agree on one point — the information war surrounding UFOs and claims like Sherman’s is intense and growing. Whether it’s a calculated disinformation campaign, a genuine whistleblower, or something in-between, these stories are becoming more mainstream, with government responses to FOIA requests on projects like Preserve Destiny only adding fuel to the fire.

The UFO Community Reacts

It’s clear that Sherman’s story resonates. The conversation has spread from niche forums to major commentators. Clips circulate online, sparking furious debate. For the curious, Patrick recommends watching the full three-hour interview with Dan Sherman for all the mind-bending details.

Sherman’s tale is not without precedent. Reports of UFO sightings, government cover-ups, and secret communications aren’t new — but the specificity and candor here are compelling. As Patrick and others point out, the sincerity in Sherman’s retelling, his willingness to entertain doubt, and the cross-examination by both believers and skeptics make this story particularly intriguing.

Conclusions: Dare to Decide for Yourself

Are you convinced? Stories like Dan Sherman’s are as much about exploring the unknown as they are about challenging our assumptions. Maybe it’s a cautionary tale about how compartmentalized intelligence operations can generate myths as well as conceal truths. Maybe it’s an early glimpse into a new chapter of human history. Or maybe, it’s one man’s incredible story — sincere, subjective, and unresolved.

Whatever your stance, the conversation is important. Pop culture is now intersecting with hard questions about government secrecy, personal experience, and the quest for evidence. With more whistleblowers coming forward, and public curiosity at an all-time high, the coming years promise even stranger revelations.

For now, take Patrick’s advice: keep an open mind, ask hard questions, and watch the horizon. This story isn’t going away — and whether it’s fact or fiction, it’s definitely unforgettable.

Let us know what you think in the comments below and consider diving into the full interview—sometimes, the most important discoveries begin with the wildest stories.

UFO Crashes at Nellis Air Force Base (Multiple Witnesses)

A New Whistleblower Comes Forward

In a recent interview, a former U.S. military security officer named Joshua Shelton shared his extraordinary experience while stationed at Area 2, a restricted section of Nellis Air Force Base — one of America’s most sensitive nuclear storage facilities.

According to Shelton, he and several fellow guards witnessed a glowing, disc-shaped craft silently moving over the base before it appeared to crash behind a nearby ridge. The event, he says, was unlike anything he had ever seen during his service.

“It was a classic flying disc-shaped object,” Shelton recalled. “It wasn’t on fire — it had this magma-like glow around the front. It deadened all sound as it passed overhead.”

The Night the Desert Went Silent

Shelton described standing outside with five other servicemen when the object appeared. It hovered roughly 200–300 feet above ground, glowing red-orange and moving without any engine noise.

As it passed over them, Shelton said the environment went completely silent — no wind, no desert sounds, no mechanical hums from nearby equipment.

“It was like being underwater,” he said. “Everything just went quiet.”

Moments later, the craft dipped lower and disappeared behind a bluff. Then came a massive flash of reddish-orange light, bright enough to illuminate the entire horizon.

Was There a Crash — or Something Else?

Despite the flash, Shelton and his team reported no explosion sound or physical shockwave. The base immediately went into lockdown, and all communication channels were restricted.

When questioned later, Shelton said the event was never officially acknowledged. No debris was recovered publicly, and reports were allegedly classified.

Some believe the craft may have been retrieved by a recovery team, similar to other rumored incidents such as the Roswell crash or the Rendlesham Forest encounter.

UFOs and Nuclear Bases: A Troubling Pattern

This isn’t the first time UFOs have been reported near nuclear facilities. Over the decades, multiple military officers have testified to UAP (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena) appearing over nuclear missile silos, storage depots, and testing ranges.

Researchers like Robert Hastings, who interviewed Shelton, have documented dozens of similar accounts — suggesting that UFOs may have a particular interest in humanity’s nuclear technology.

“There’s a clear pattern,” Hastings has stated. “These craft appear where nuclear weapons are stored or tested. It’s as if they’re monitoring us.”

The Ongoing Mystery

The Nellis incident remains officially unconfirmed, but the testimony of multiple witnesses — combined with the consistency of global reports — makes it one of the most compelling modern UFO cases.

Whether it was an experimental aircraft, an atmospheric anomaly, or something truly otherworldly, the event continues to raise questions about what’s really happening above some of the most secure facilities on Earth.

Key Takeaways

• Multiple witnesses reported a glowing disc-shaped craft over Nellis Air Force Base.

• The craft emitted no sound and appeared to crash behind a ridge near the base.

• The event occurred over a nuclear weapons storage site, adding to the mystery.

• No official explanation or acknowledgment has been given.

• The case fits a long pattern of UFO sightings near nuclear facilities.

FAQs About the Nellis Air Force Base UFO Crash

1. When did the Nellis UFO incident occur?
According to the whistleblower, the events took place in the early 2000s while he was stationed at Area 2 of Nellis Air Force Base.

2. How many witnesses saw the craft?
At least six military personnel were present during the sighting, all describing the same glowing disc and sudden silence.

3. Was there physical evidence of a crash?
Witnesses reported a massive flash of light but no explosion or debris. The area was sealed off immediately afterward.

4. Why are UFOs often seen near nuclear sites?
Researchers believe UAPs may monitor nuclear weapons or energy sources — a trend documented in dozens of similar military sightings.

5. Has the U.S. government commented on the Nellis case?
No official statement has been made. The event remains unacknowledged and unclassified in any public records.

Ross Coulthart Drops UFO Surprise

In a new episode from Patrick at Vetted, the focus turns to Ross Coulthart’s recent interview on NewsNation, where he dropped major hints about the Skywatcher team — a privately funded research group investigating UAPs (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena) using psionics and telepathic experiments.

Coulthart confirmed that Skywatcher’s latest research is currently under peer review, and that the group plans to release a new video soon detailing their findings.

Patrick’s breakdown sheds light on what’s happening behind the scenes — and why the intersection of consciousness and UAPs could redefine the disclosure conversation in 2025.

Who Are Skywatcher and What Are They Studying?

Skywatcher is a privately funded scientific initiative led by Jake Barber and Alex Clous, known for their unconventional approach to UAP research.
Their focus: exploring whether human intention, thought, and telepathy can influence or summon UAP activity — a concept known as psionics.

According to Coulthart, Skywatcher’s team has been conducting controlled experiments to test the correlation between mental focus and physical manifestations of unidentified craft.

He revealed that the group’s telepathy and psionics study has been submitted for peer review — a rare step in a field often criticized for lacking scientific rigor.

“They’re in a very rigorous peer‑review process,” Coulthart said. “It’s taking longer than expected, but there’s no cover‑up. They want to be transparent.”

Peer Review and Scientific Transparency

In the world of UAP research, claims of telepathic contact or “summoning” often attract skepticism.
That’s why Skywatcher’s decision to submit their findings for independent peer review is so significant.

Patrick emphasizes that this could mark a turning point for the field — moving from anecdotal evidence to verifiable data.

If the study passes peer review, it could become one of the first scientifically validated explorations of psionics and consciousness‑based UAP interaction.

The Psionics Phenomenon Explained

“Psionics” refers to the deliberate use of mental or psychic energy to influence physical reality — including communication or interaction with non‑human intelligences.

Skywatcher’s experiments reportedly involve:

• Group intention exercises to attract anomalous aerial activity

• Telepathic synchronization between participants

• Instrumental monitoring (thermal, electromagnetic, and video data)

Coulthart hinted that one unrecorded private experiment allegedly resulted in a craft landing, witnessed by two psionic operators.
While unverified, this story has fueled speculation about direct consciousness‑UAP connections.

Patrick’s Analysis: Between Science and Secrecy

Patrick notes that while Ross Coulthart supports Skywatcher’s transparency, he also shares the community’s frustration over their silence.

Skywatcher hasn’t released new public material for months, prompting rumors of internal conflict and NDA restrictions.
Former member Mike Batista even confirmed he’s under non‑disclosure agreements, suggesting the group’s research may involve sensitive data or military collaboration.

Patrick argues that this tension — between scientific openness and necessary secrecy — defines the modern disclosure movement.
He urges viewers to stay patient, as peer review can take months but ensures credibility and legitimacy.

Ross Coulthart’s Broader Message

Coulthart, a respected investigative journalist and author of In Plain Sight, has become one of the most trusted voices in UAP journalism.
He insists that Skywatcher’s work represents a serious scientific effort, not pseudoscience.

He also confirmed that he plans to interview Jake Barber or Alex Clous once the peer‑review process concludes — potentially giving the public its first verified glimpse into telepathic UAP research.

“I’m really excited,” Coulthart said. “Work that I’m aware of involving telepathy will be made public very soon. Watch this space.”

Why This Matters for 2025 Disclosure

2025 is shaping up to be a pivotal year for UAP transparency.
With Congressional hearings, documentary releases, and peer‑reviewed studies converging, the field is finally gaining institutional legitimacy.

If Skywatcher’s study is published, it could:

• Bridge the gap between consciousness research and aerospace science

• Provide empirical data on telepathic or psionic effects

• Support the idea that mind and matter are connected in ways modern science barely understands

Patrick concludes that this could be the most important step toward a scientifically grounded disclosure — one that unites physics, psychology, and philosophy.

What Do You Think?

Do you believe telepathy and intention can influence UAP phenomena?
Or is psionics just a modern myth waiting to be debunked?

👇 Share your thoughts in the comments or watch the full discussion here:
🎥 Vetted – Ross Coulthart on Skywatcher and Psionics

Tim Burchett Comes Clean About UFOs

When it comes to UFOs, few politicians speak as boldly as Congressman Tim Burchett.
In a recent interview with Tucker Carlson, Burchett dropped several bombshells — from sworn testimony about alien beings to a massive underwater craft the size of a football field.

YouTuber Patrick from Vetted broke down the entire conversation, separating sensational quotes from what might actually be credible.
Here’s what you need to know.

“I’ve Seen Beings” – Sworn Testimony

Burchett told Carlson that multiple sworn witnesses — including former intelligence officials — have testified that they’ve seen non-human beings and craft.

He referenced a soon-to-be-released documentary called The Age of Disclosure, which was previewed at SXSW 2024.
In that film, Jay Stratton, the former head of the Pentagon’s UAP Task Force (and David Grusch’s former boss), reportedly says:

“I have seen with my own eyes non-human craft and non-human beings.”

Patrick notes that Stratton is one of the highest-ranking U.S. officials ever to make such a statement publicly — though he hasn’t testified under oath.

The Underwater UFO Encounter

Burchett also shared a story from a military officer who claimed to witness a huge craft moving underwater at 200 mph off the U.S. East Coast.
Jets reportedly tried to pursue it — unsuccessfully.

Burchett said:

“It was as big as a football field — and that’s no fish.”

He argues that such sightings are routinely suppressed or dismissed, and that Congress is being stonewalled by intelligence agencies.

The Age of Disclosure Documentary

Patrick explains that The Age of Disclosure could be released later this year, possibly with a limited theatrical run and then on Amazon Prime Video.
The film allegedly includes interviews with CIA veterans and military insiders who claim to have handled or studied non-human craft.

Burchett himself appears briefly in the film and hinted that some parties are trying to prevent its release — though Patrick notes that both he and journalist Ross Coulthart have heard it will be released soon.

“The Onion Has Many Layers”

Burchett described the UFO cover-up as a deeply layered system of deception:

“It’s like peeling an onion — every time you think you’ve got to the bottom, there’s another layer.”

He believes that until someone from inside the system leaks physical evidence — or until the White House orders full disclosure — the truth will remain hidden.

Tucker Carlson’s Take

Carlson admitted he rarely covers UFOs because he believes there’s been a 70-year U.S. government disinformation campaign designed to confuse the public.
He said:

“There’s something going on — but what is it?”

Both he and Burchett agreed that the topic is deadly serious, not a joke for late-night TV, and that it’s a global security issue, not just an American one.

Patrick’s Analysis

Patrick from Vetted remains cautious but intrigued.
He points out that while Burchett’s stories are dramatic, they align with recent whistleblower claims, declassified Navy videos, and official Pentagon investigations into UAPs.

He also notes that the media’s quick dismissal of the topic might be part of a coordinated effort to discredit legitimate witnesses.

What Comes Next

If The Age of Disclosure is released publicly, it could mark a major turning point in how governments handle UAP transparency.
Between Burchett’s bold statements, Stratton’s alleged testimony, and Carlson’s growing interest, the UFO conversation is entering a new phase — one that might finally force disclosure.

What Do You Think?

Do you believe Tim Burchett’s claims about sworn testimony and alien beings?
Or is this just another layer of the “onion” meant to keep us guessing?

👇 Share your thoughts in the comments or watch the full video here:
🎥 Vetted – Tim Burchett’s UFO Interview with Tucker Carlson

Joe Rogan Drops UFO Surprise

What if one of the most mysterious discoveries in modern archaeology wasn’t in space—but buried beneath the sands of Egypt?

In a recent episode of Vetted, host Patrick dives into a jaw-dropping claim: a 40-meter-long metallic object of unknown origin, shaped like the now-famous “Tic Tac” UFO, has allegedly been detected under the Egyptian desert using ground-penetrating radar.

The story, which originated from discussions in the Vetted Discord community, has sparked intense speculation—linking ancient Egypt, UFOs, and modern whistleblower testimony in one of the strangest crossovers of the year.

The Alleged Discovery

According to the discussion Patrick references, researchers scanning an underground labyrinth near the Nile reportedly detected a metallic, cigar-shaped object roughly 40 meters (130 feet) long.

The find allegedly came to light through geophysical scans of a subterranean complex believed to predate the Great Pyramids.
However, the labyrinth is now flooded due to changes in the water table after the construction of the Aswan Dam in the 1960s, making excavation nearly impossible.

Patrick notes that some theorists believe the object could be accessed by tunneling below the water table, though no official archaeological team has confirmed such an effort.

The UFO Connection

The reason this story has gone viral isn’t just the object’s size—it’s the shape.
The “Tic Tac” design immediately recalls the U.S. Navy’s 2004 UFO encounters, where pilots reported chasing a smooth, featureless, white craft moving at impossible speeds.

Patrick draws parallels between this alleged Egyptian discovery and comments made by Bob Lazar, the controversial Area 51 whistleblower.
In his 2019 interview with Joe Rogan, Lazar mentioned that some recovered UFOs were found during archaeological digs, suggesting that at least one craft was ancient.

If true, the implications are staggering: could ancient civilizations have unearthed—or even interacted with—technology not of this world?

Historical Parallels and Ancient Lore

The idea of advanced or “divine” technology hidden beneath Egypt isn’t new.
Ancient Egyptian texts speak of the “gods walking among men”, and myths describe objects of power buried with pharaohs or sealed within temples.

Some researchers, including Jacques Vallée and Diana Pasulka, have proposed that ancient accounts of gods and angels might describe the same phenomena modern UFO witnesses report today—interpreted through the lens of ancient culture.

Patrick also references Dylan Borland, a recent UFO whistleblower who testified in 2024 that some of these “craft” might be both extraterrestrial and interdimensional, possibly explaining why similar stories appear across cultures and millennia.

Skepticism and Open Questions

As of now, there is no verified evidence of a metallic object beneath Egypt.
The claim appears to stem from unconfirmed radar interpretations and online speculation.

That said, the idea raises legitimate questions about what might lie beneath Egypt’s still-unexplored subterranean structures.
Modern scanning technology has revealed hundreds of hidden chambers and tunnels under the Giza Plateau, many of which remain unexcavated due to flooding or political restrictions.

So while the “Tic Tac UFO” claim may be more myth than fact, it highlights a real truth: Egypt still hides countless secrets beneath its surface.

Could It Be an Ancient UFO?

If, hypothetically, a metallic craft were discovered beneath Egypt, it could rewrite not only archaeological history but also our understanding of human origins.

Was it a relic of a lost civilization?
A natural geological anomaly?
Or evidence that the “gods” of ancient myth were visitors from beyond our world?

Patrick doesn’t claim to know—but he emphasizes that the pattern is worth noticing:

“If UFOs have crashed throughout history, why wouldn’t some be ancient? Why would all of them only appear in the modern era?”

Conclusion: Buried Truths and Modern Mysteries

While the 40-meter “Tic Tac” beneath Egypt remains unverified, the discussion itself reveals something deeper: humanity’s enduring curiosity about what lies hidden—both beneath our feet and beyond our skies.

Whether this story turns out to be a modern myth, a misinterpreted scan, or a genuine discovery, it continues a long tradition of mystery linking ancient Egypt, the stars, and the unknown.

What Do You Think?

Could there really be a metallic “Tic Tac” UFO buried beneath Egypt’s sands?
Or is this just another case of modern mythmaking fueled by internet speculation?

👇 Share your thoughts in the comments or watch the full discussion here:
🎥 Vetted – The 40-Meter Tic Tac Found Beneath Egypt

NEW Proof David Grusch is Being Silenced

In 2025, the UFO disclosure movement continues to reveal shocking truths — but some stories are still being silenced. One of the most intriguing comes from Brett Robinson, a Notre Dame media studies professor, who revealed that he filmed a 3-hour interview with David Grusch, the former intelligence officer and UFO whistleblower who testified before Congress.

The catch? Robinson was “discouraged” from including it in his documentary Edge of Belief.

This revelation, shared in a Vettit video, has sent ripples through both the UFO and faith communities, raising questions about academic censorship, government influence, and spiritual warfare.

Who Is Brett Robinson?

Brett Robinson is not a fringe conspiracy theorist — he’s a respected Catholic media scholar whose work explores how technology, theology, and communication intersect.

In Edge of Belief, Robinson investigates how religious thought can help interpret the modern UFO phenomenon. His documentary features scholars like Dr. Diana Pasulka (American Cosmic) and explores how faith and science can coexist in the face of unexplained encounters.

But when it came to David Grusch — the man whose testimony shook Washington — Robinson says he was told not to include the footage.

That raises a chilling question: Who told him not to?

The Missing David Grusch Interview

Robinson’s disclosure came during an interview with Vettit host Patrick, where he mentioned that he and his team had recorded a three-hour sit-down with Grusch.

“We were discouraged from actually including it in the final,” Robinson said.
When asked who discouraged him, he replied simply: “Other people.”

The vague answer has fueled speculation about whether government agencies, university officials, or private institutions pressured him to keep the footage hidden.

Given Grusch’s claims about non-human craft retrieval programs and classified operations, it’s no surprise that such an interview could be considered too sensitive for release.

Edge of Belief: The Catholic Lens on UFOs

Robinson’s documentary Edge of Belief takes a unique approach to the UFO phenomenon — one rooted in Catholic theology and philosophical inquiry.

Rather than treating UFOs purely as a scientific mystery, the film asks:

• Could these entities be spiritual rather than extraterrestrial?

• How does faith interpret encounters with non-human intelligences?

• What do ancient religious texts say about beings “not of this world”?

Even without the Grusch footage, the documentary dives deep into the intersection of belief, mystery, and modern science, offering a rare academic perspective on a topic often dominated by speculation.

Jacques Vallée, Diana Pasulka, and the Spiritual Side of UFOs

Robinson also revealed that he had dinner with Jacques Vallée, one of the most respected UFO researchers of all time. While Vallée declined to be filmed, their conversation reportedly centered on Satan and the biblical phrase “the prince of this world.”

This aligns with Vallée’s long-held view that UFO phenomena may represent interdimensional or spiritual manifestations — not necessarily beings from another planet.

Together with Diana Pasulka, Robinson and Vallée represent a growing movement of thinkers exploring UFOs through a theological and metaphysical lens.

Why Was the Grusch Footage Suppressed?

The big question remains: Why was Robinson discouraged from releasing the Grusch interview?

Possible explanations include:

• Institutional pressure from Notre Dame or Church authorities

• National security concerns due to classified content

• Fear of controversy over mixing UFOs with theology

• Or, as some speculate, a deeper effort to control the UFO narrative

Regardless of the reason, the suppression has only made the story more compelling — and the public more curious.

The Bigger Picture: Faith, Disclosure, and Control

The Edge of Belief controversy highlights a broader 2025 reality: the collision of faith, science, and secrecy.

As governments release more UAP data and whistleblowers speak out, religious institutions are being forced to confront questions once thought unthinkable:

• What if we’re not alone?

• How does that fit into creation theology?

• Are these entities truly extraterrestrial—or something spiritual?

In this sense, Robinson’s documentary — and the missing Grusch footage — symbolize the struggle between revelation and restriction, between truth and control.

Watch, Think, and Discuss

If this story fascinates you, don’t stop here.
👉 Watch the full video on YouTube: David Grusch Hidden Interview Explained (Vetted)
👉 Stream the full documentary: Edge of Belief on YouTube
👉 Join the conversation: Share your thoughts on faith, UFOs, and disclosure using #EdgeOfBelief and #UFOFaithDebate

💬 What do you think?
Was the Grusch footage suppressed for national security—or for spiritual reasons? Leave your thoughts in the comments and keep the discussion alive.

Conclusion

The mystery of the hidden David Grusch interview is more than just a UFO story — it’s a reflection of how truth, faith, and power collide in our modern world.

In 2025, as humanity stands on the edge of disclosure, Edge of Belief reminds us that the greatest mysteries may not lie in the stars, but within our own spiritual understanding.

Roswell Will Never Be The Same

For nearly eighty years, the Roswell UFO incident has stood as one of the greatest mysteries in modern history. In July 1947, something crashed in the desert near Roswell, New Mexico. The U.S. military first announced it had recovered a “flying disc”—then quickly retracted the statement, claiming it was a weather balloon.

Now, newly unearthed audio recordings of Major Jesse Marcel Sr., the first military officer on the scene, are reigniting the debate. These tapes, long hidden from public view, may finally reveal what really happened that summer night—and why the truth was buried.

Who Was Major Jesse Marcel Sr.?

Major Jesse Marcel Sr. was an intelligence officer with the 509th Bomb Group—the only atomic‑armed unit in the world at the time. When the Roswell debris was discovered on a remote ranch, Marcel was dispatched to investigate.

According to official accounts, he collected fragments of the wreckage and brought them back to the Roswell Army Air Field. But in later interviews, Marcel insisted that what he found was not from this Earth.

“It was nothing made by human hands,” he once said. “It wasn’t anything we had then—or have now.”

The newly released recordings, analyzed in the Vetted investigation, capture Marcel speaking candidly about what he saw, decades after the event—without the filters of military censorship or media spin.

Inside the Secret Recordings

The tapes were reportedly made in the late 1970s and early 1980s, as Marcel reflected on his experience. In them, he describes debris that was lightweight yet indestructible, covered with strange symbols or hieroglyphs, and unlike any known material.

He recalls trying to burn or bend the fragments—without success. Even more strikingly, Marcel admits he was ordered to stay silent after the Army Air Force changed its story.

“We were told to say it was a weather balloon,” he says in the recording. “But that wasn’t what I picked up out there.”

These words, captured in his own voice, add a new layer of authenticity to one of the most contested stories in UFO history.

The Roswell Cover‑Up: A Timeline

To understand the weight of Marcel’s testimony, it’s worth revisiting the timeline of events:

• July 7, 1947: Rancher Mac Brazel finds strange debris scattered across his property near Corona, NM.

• July 8: The Roswell Army Air Field issues a press release claiming the recovery of a “flying disc.”

• Hours later: The statement is retracted; the debris is said to be a weather balloon.

• Late 1940s–1970s: The incident fades from public attention amid Cold War secrecy.

• 1978: Researcher Stanton Friedman interviews Jesse Marcel Sr., reigniting interest.

• 2020s: Newly discovered recordings emerge, offering Marcel’s unfiltered recollections.

The Vetted analysis suggests these tapes could be among the most significant firsthand evidence of the Roswell event ever found.

Material That Defied Explanation

One of the most intriguing details in Marcel’s recordings is his description of the metallic debris. He speaks of a foil‑like material that was extremely light yet impossible to dent or tear.

He also mentions beams inscribed with purplish symbols that looked like writing—but not in any known language. These details have appeared in previous testimonies, but hearing them directly from Marcel’s voice lends new weight to their credibility.

Modern materials scientists have attempted to hypothesize what such a substance could be—memory metal, titanium alloys, or experimental composites—but even today, none fully match Marcel’s description.

Skeptics vs. Believers

Skeptics have long argued that the Roswell debris came from Project Mogul, a classified balloon designed to detect Soviet nuclear tests. The military’s 1994 report reaffirmed this explanation, dismissing UFO claims as misidentifications.

However, proponents of the extraterrestrial hypothesis point out inconsistencies:

• The 509th Bomb Group was highly trained and unlikely to mistake balloon debris for advanced technology.

• Witnesses described hieroglyphic markings and metal that couldn’t be cut or burned, unlike balloon materials.

• The speed and intensity of the military cover‑up suggest something far more sensitive than a balloon test.

The newly surfaced recordings don’t prove alien involvement—but they deepen the mystery by confirming that Marcel himself never accepted the official story.

Why the Recordings Matter Now

In an era of renewed government transparency around UAPs (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena), Marcel’s voice feels prophetic.

Recent Pentagon briefings and whistleblower testimonies have reignited public interest in UFOs, suggesting that non‑human technology may indeed exist. Against this backdrop, the rediscovery of Marcel’s tapes provides historical continuity—a reminder that the secrecy began long before the modern UAP era.

The Vetted team emphasizes that these recordings are not sensationalized; they’re presented with archival integrity, allowing Marcel to speak for himself. His tone is calm, reflective, and utterly convinced.

The Human Side of the Mystery

Beyond the intrigue of UFOs and cover‑ups, Marcel’s story is deeply human. He was a decorated officer, a family man, and a professional who risked his reputation to tell the truth as he saw it.

In the recordings, you can hear the weight of that choice—the frustration of being dismissed, the pain of being labeled mistaken or delusional. His son, Jesse Marcel Jr., later followed in his footsteps, publicly defending his father’s credibility and sharing his own recollections of handling the same strange debris as a child.

“Dad wasn’t lying,” Marcel Jr. said. “He knew what he saw.”

A Legacy of Secrecy and Silence

The Roswell incident became a cultural touchstone, inspiring decades of speculation, documentaries, and government denials. Yet, despite countless investigations, no definitive explanation has ever been proven.

The newly surfaced recordings don’t solve the mystery—but they do restore a voice that had been missing from the conversation. They remind us that behind every legend lies a human witness, struggling to make sense of the impossible.

Rewriting the Roswell Narrative

If Marcel’s testimony is accurate, then the Roswell crash was not a misunderstanding—it was a moment of contact, however brief, with something beyond our current understanding.

This possibility forces us to reconsider not just the event itself, but the entire framework of secrecy surrounding UFOs. Why would the government suppress such information? Fear of panic? National security? Or something deeper—perhaps the realization that we are not alone?

Whatever the reason, Marcel’s voice challenges us to look again, to question what we’ve been told, and to seek truth even when it’s inconvenient.

The Takeaway: Listening to the Past

The rediscovery of Jesse Marcel Sr.’s recordings is more than a historical curiosity—it’s a reminder of courage and conviction.

He didn’t have social media, whistleblower protections, or a global audience. Yet he spoke his truth, knowing it might never be believed. Today, as governments slowly declassify UFO data, his words feel more relevant than ever.

“It wasn’t from this Earth,” Marcel said. “And someday, people will know.”

Perhaps that day is closer than we think.

Psychic Spy Drops Bombshell About Hal Puthoff

The worlds of remote viewing and UFO investigation have long overlapped in whispers and speculation.
But now, thanks to a recent interview with Major Paul H. Smith, one of the original participants in the CIA’s Stargate Program, we have direct confirmation that these two worlds may have officially crossed paths.

In a discussion on the Third Eye Drops podcast — later analyzed by Patrick from Betted — Smith revealed that he was hired to lead a team of remote viewers to study the 2004 USS Nimitz UAP incident.

🎥 Watch the original video on YouTube

Who Is Major Paul H. Smith?

Paul H. Smith is a retired U.S. Army intelligence officer, PhD in philosophy, and one of the most respected figures in the field of remote viewing — the psychic practice of perceiving distant or unseen targets using only the mind.

He served in the CIA’s Stargate Program during the 1980s, which investigated psychic phenomena for potential military and intelligence applications.
Smith later authored Reading the Enemy’s Mind and The Essential Guide to Remote Viewing, and continues to teach the skill today.

The Revelation: A Secret Remote Viewing of the Nimitz UFO

In the podcast, Smith dropped a bombshell:
He said that in 2011, he was contracted to assemble a team of remote viewers to focus on the USS Nimitz UFO encounter — the now‑famous 2004 incident involving Navy pilots who tracked a “Tic Tac‑shaped” craft performing impossible maneuvers.

Smith explained that:

• He was hired under an NDA (non‑disclosure agreement).

• The project may have been connected to the OAP or AATIP programs — government efforts to study unidentified aerial phenomena.

• Hal Puthoff, a physicist and long‑time figure in both remote viewing and UAP research, acted as the liaison between Smith’s team and the contracting agency.

“We had a building dedicated to our use,” Smith recalls. “Three grey remote viewing rooms, six viewers, two analysts, and a full week of sessions.”

Although he admitted the project didn’t yield strong results, the very existence of such an operation is remarkable — suggesting that psychic intelligence methods were still being quietly used to explore UAP mysteries well into the 2010s.

Connection to the CIA’s Stargate Legacy

The Stargate Program officially ended in the mid‑1990s after being declassified.
However, Smith’s account implies that interest in remote viewing never truly disappeared — it simply shifted into private or contract‑based research tied to defense and intelligence projects.

His mention of Jay Stratton (former head of the Pentagon’s UAP Task Force) and Hal Puthoff further connects this story to the modern UAP research ecosystem, which includes AATIP, AAWSAP, and other secretive programs.

Michael’s Reaction: Why This Matters

Patrick’s collaborator, Michael from Third Eye Drops, emphasizes that Smith’s credibility makes this revelation significant.
Unlike many sensationalists in the UFO community, Smith is known for his measured, evidence‑based approach.

“When someone like Major Paul Smith tells me a story like this, I pay attention,” Michael says.
“He’s not chasing clicks — he’s reporting what he actually did.”

This lends serious weight to the idea that official U.S. programs have continued to explore non‑traditional intelligence methods — including psychic perception — to investigate UFO phenomena.

Implications: Why Would the Government Use Remote Viewing for UFOs?

If Smith’s account is accurate, it suggests that:

• The U.S. government still sees potential value in consciousness‑based intelligence.

• Officials may believe that psychic perception could complement sensor data when studying non‑human technology.

• The boundaries between science, intelligence, and metaphysics are blurrier than most people realize.

This aligns with decades of speculation that agencies like the CIA and DIA have quietly maintained interest in the intersection of consciousness and advanced technology — from telepathy experiments to UAP analysis.

Skepticism and Caution

To his credit, Smith himself avoids sensational claims.
He admits that his team’s results were inconclusive, and that he doesn’t remember the full details because all materials were turned over to the contracting agency.

Still, the fact that such a project existed at all — involving classified funding, official oversight, and a team of trained remote viewers — is enough to reignite debate about how far the U.S. government is willing to go in its search for answers about UAPs.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

1. What is remote viewing?

Remote viewing is a mental technique used to perceive or describe distant targets using extrasensory perception (ESP). It was studied by the CIA and U.S. Army from the 1970s to the 1990s under the Stargate Program.

2. What was the USS Nimitz UFO incident?

In 2004, Navy pilots from the USS Nimitz encountered a “Tic Tac”‑shaped object that defied known physics. The incident is one of the most credible UAP cases ever recorded.

3. Who is Hal Puthoff?

Dr. Harold E. Puthoff is a physicist who co‑founded the CIA’s remote viewing research and later worked with the Pentagon’s AATIP/UAP programs. He served as liaison for Smith’s 2011 project.

4. Was the remote viewing operation successful?

Smith says the results were limited and not especially clear, but the process itself was “a marvelous effort.” All data were turned over to the contracting agency.

5. Does this mean the government still uses remote viewing?

Smith’s story implies that some level of interest continues, possibly through private contractors or classified programs, though no official confirmation exists.

Conclusion: The Psychic Frontier of UFO Research

Major Paul H. Smith’s account bridges two of the most mysterious subjects in modern history — psychic espionage and UFO investigation.
Whether or not remote viewing can truly reveal insights about UAPs, the fact that it was used in official research suggests that governments are willing to explore every possible angle in the search for truth.

As Patrick from Betted concludes, “It’s one of those stories that makes you realize: the line between science fiction and reality is thinner than we think.”

3i/ATLAS is Headed For Earth NOW? (Full Details)

In late 2025, the European Space Agency (ESA) released new images of an unusual object hurtling through the solar system — officially named 3I Atlas. The “3I” stands for third interstellar object ever observed, following ʻOumuamua (2017) and Borisov (2019).

But this one is different. It’s massive — roughly the size of Manhattan — and glowing unusually bright for a comet. Its speed, trajectory, and reflective behavior have sparked one of the most fascinating debates in modern astronomy: is 3I Atlas a natural object… or something else entirely?

The Spark of the Debate

The controversy began when astrophysicist Dr. Avi Loeb — known for his theory that ʻOumuamua might have been alien technology — suggested that 3I Atlas could also be artificial. He pointed out that its trajectory aligns within 9° of the famous “Wow! Signal”, a mysterious radio transmission detected in 1977 that some believe came from extraterrestrial intelligence.

Journalist Ross Coulthart, who has investigated UAP (unidentified aerial phenomena), echoed Loeb’s curiosity, calling for serious scientific attention rather than dismissal. Together, their comments reignited the public’s fascination with the question: Are we being watched?

The Science Behind the Mystery

Despite the excitement, most scientists remain cautious. The ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter observed 3I Atlas as it passed near Mars on October 3rd, confirming that it’s on an unbound trajectory — meaning it’s not orbiting the Sun and will soon leave the solar system.

Its brightness, however, is puzzling. Typical comets reflect sunlight based on dust and ice sublimation, but 3I Atlas’s early, intense glow doesn’t fit the usual pattern. Some researchers propose that it might have an unusual composition — perhaps rich in metals or exotic ices — while others admit that current data simply isn’t enough to draw firm conclusions.

Avi Loeb’s Alien Hypothesis

Dr. Loeb argues that we shouldn’t dismiss the possibility of alien technology. He suggests 3I Atlas could be a derelict probe or fragment of an interstellar craft, possibly sent millions of years ago.

Loeb’s reasoning is simple: extraordinary behavior deserves open-minded investigation. If humanity encountered a sign of intelligent life, it would likely come in the form of an artifact — not a radio message.

Still, Loeb emphasizes that this doesn’t mean 3I Atlas is an alien craft — only that science should remain curious enough to test that idea.

Coulthart’s Call for Transparency

Journalist Ross Coulthart, known for his work on UAP investigations, supports Loeb’s cautious curiosity. In the Vetted video, he mentions that intelligence agencies often prepare contingency plans for “black swan” events — low-probability but high-impact scenarios like alien contact.

Coulthart argues that the public deserves transparency if 3I Atlas exhibits truly anomalous behavior. So far, there’s no evidence of that — but the fact that it’s being tracked closely by multiple space agencies shows how seriously it’s being taken.

The Rational View: Probably a Comet

Even Patrick, the host of Vetted, concludes that while the alien theory is exciting, most evidence still points to a natural origin. 3I Atlas behaves mostly like a comet — just with some quirks that may be explained by its interstellar nature.

It’s the third interstellar object ever detected, and as telescope technology improves, astronomers expect to find many more. With a larger sample size, what seems “unusual” today may soon become normal.

What Happens Next?

3I Atlas will continue its journey out of the solar system by spring 2026, giving scientists limited time to study it. The ESA, NASA, and independent observatories are gathering as much data as possible — including spectral analysis to determine its composition.

If nothing else, 3I Atlas reminds us how little we truly know about the cosmos — and how every strange visitor challenges our assumptions about what’s “normal” in space.

Conclusion: The Line Between Science and Wonder

Whether 3I Atlas turns out to be a comet, a fragment of alien technology, or something entirely new, it has already succeeded in one thing: making humanity look up again.

As Avi Loeb often says, “The worst mistake in science is to stop asking questions.” And as Ross Coulthart adds, “The truth, whatever it is, deserves to be found.”

Maybe that’s the real message of 3I Atlas — not from aliens, but from ourselves: to stay curious, humble, and ready for the unknown.

FAQs About 3I Atlas

1. What is 3I Atlas?
It’s the third known interstellar object detected passing through our solar system — a massive, glowing body likely made of ice and dust.

2. Why do some scientists think it might be alien?
Its unusual brightness, speed, and alignment with the direction of the 1977 “Wow! Signal” have sparked speculation that it could be artificial.

3. Is 3I Atlas dangerous to Earth?
No. Despite early media confusion, it is not on a collision course with Earth and will exit the solar system by 2026.

4. What does “3I” stand for?
“3I” means third interstellar object — following ʻOumuamua (1I) and Borisov (2I).

5. What do most scientists believe?
The majority view is that 3I Atlas is a natural comet with unusual properties, not alien technology — though research continues.

Key Takeaways: 3I Atlas & the Alien Debate

• 3I Atlas is the third interstellar object ever observed, traveling on an unbound path through our solar system.

• Its brightness and speed are unusual, prompting speculation from scientists like Avi Loeb.

• Most experts believe it’s natural, though the data remains incomplete.

• The alignment with the “Wow! Signal” is intriguing but likely coincidental.

• The real lesson: Science thrives on curiosity — and 3I Atlas reminds us to keep exploring the unknown.

Ross Coulthart Drops UFO Surprise

When journalist Ross Coulthart first revealed footage of a mysterious “egg-shaped craft” being retrieved by helicopter, the UFO community erupted. The video, aired on NewsNation, appeared to show a smooth, metallic, oval-shaped object — roughly 20 feet long — suspended beneath a helicopter by cables, being carefully lowered to the ground.

Coulthart described it as one of the clearest UAP (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena) retrieval videos ever captured — a rare glimpse into what some claim is a secretive U.S. government crash recovery program.

But as the hype grew, so did the skepticism. The footage was intriguing — but without a date, location, or verifiable source, many began asking: Is this the smoking gun, or just another UFO mirage?

Ross Coulthart’s Statement: “I Know It’s Authentic”

When pressed for details, Coulthart stood firm. He refused to reveal the source of the footage, saying that doing so could “implicate the people who provided it.”

“If I gave you the date, the location, and the full details,” Coulthart explained, “the people who provided me that video might be implicated. One of the obligations we have as journalists is to protect our sources.”

He went on to emphasize that he’s convinced the video is genuine and typical of the kind of objects reportedly retrieved by Jake “Jacob” Barber, a whistleblower who claims to have participated in secret UAP recovery operations at a site known only as “the range.”

According to Coulthart, the video didn’t come from Barber himself but from others familiar with these alleged retrievals.

The Footage: What We See — and What We Don’t

In the clip, a helicopter hovers above a clearing, slowly lowering what appears to be an egg-shaped metallic craft wrapped in a sling. The object is smooth, featureless, and reflective — with no visible seams, windows, or propulsion systems.

Coulthart called it “one of the clearest images of a UAP ever taken.”

However, without metadata, timestamps, or identifiable landmarks, it’s impossible to verify the footage. No government agency has commented on it, and no independent analysis has confirmed its authenticity.

That silence, Coulthart argues, is telling:

“The most conspicuous thing is the lack of comment from the Department of Defense or the intelligence community. They’ve said nothing — because they know it’s genuine.”

Congressional Frustration and the Bigger Picture

Coulthart also criticized U.S. lawmakers for failing to act on whistleblower claims and for blocking new UAP disclosure laws three years in a row.

He pointed to Representative Anna Paulina Luna, who has called for subpoenas and involuntary testimony from key witnesses involved in alleged crash retrieval programs.

“Congress knows all this,” Coulthart said. “They’ve been told in secure briefings. Yet they refuse to confront the national security state that’s hiding the truth from the public.”

According to him, the “egg video” is just one piece of a much larger puzzle — one that includes secret facilities, recovered craft, and decades of government cover-ups.

Skeptics Push Back: “No Context, No Credibility”

While Coulthart’s conviction has impressed many, critics argue that the lack of transparency undermines the entire case.

Without verifiable information — no date, no coordinates, no chain of custody — the video remains unverifiable. Some analysts even suggest it could depict a military test, a mock-up, or a training exercise rather than an extraterrestrial craft.

As one commentator put it:

“If we can’t verify who filmed it, when, or where — we have to treat it as entertainment, not evidence.”

Why the Video Still Matters

Even if the footage can’t yet be confirmed, it’s reignited a crucial debate: How much does the public have a right to know about UAP programs?

The U.S. government has acknowledged that unidentified objects exist — but the extent of what’s been recovered remains classified. If Coulthart’s sources are credible, the “egg” may be the first real glimpse into decades of covert retrieval operations.

For now, the video sits in a gray zone — too compelling to dismiss, too vague to confirm.

Conclusion: Between Proof and Belief

The “egg-shaped UFO” video is a perfect symbol of modern ufology — a blend of mystery, secrecy, and frustration. Whether it’s genuine evidence of non-human technology or a misunderstood military artifact, it’s forced the conversation forward.

Until verifiable data emerges, it remains what many call it: “the most believable unbelievable video yet.”

FAQ: The Egg-Shaped UFO Retrieval

1. What does the video show?
A helicopter retrieving a smooth, egg-shaped object — allegedly a downed UFO — using cables and a sling.

2. Who released the footage?
Investigative journalist Ross Coulthart, via NewsNation, who claims it came from confidential sources.

3. Has the video been verified?
No. There’s no confirmed date, location, or source, and no official analysis has authenticated it.

4. What does Ross Coulthart say about it?
He insists the video is authentic and represents real UAP recovery operations — though he won’t reveal his sources.

5. What do skeptics think?
Many believe it’s either misinterpreted or staged, arguing that without verifiable data, it can’t be treated as evidence.

Stay Informed — The Truth Is Still Out There

Whether this video is proof or illusion, it’s reignited global interest in the UAP phenomenon. Follow our updates for the latest verified information, expert analysis, and developments on Ross Coulthart’s investigation into the world’s most mysterious retrievals.

Tim Burchett Drops UFO Surprise (What is going on?)

In a recent Newsmax interview, U.S. Representative Tim Burchett discussed intelligence reports suggesting the existence of deep‑water alien bases on Earth. When asked directly if such bases might exist, Burchett replied, “I would say that’s pretty accurate.”

He went on to explain that several deep ocean regions — areas less explored than the surface of the moon — show unusually high frequencies of UFO or UAP (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena) sightings. According to Burchett, Navy personnel have reported tracking massive objects, as large as football fields, moving underwater at speeds up to 200 mph — far beyond known human technology.

The Five Deep‑Sea Hotspots

Burchett mentioned five or six deep‑water zones around the world where UAP activity is reportedly concentrated. These include areas where naval radar and sonar have detected fast‑moving submerged objects.

While he didn’t name exact locations, UFO researchers have long pointed to regions such as the Catalina Islands off California, the Puerto Rico Trench, and parts of the Caribbean and Pacific Oceans as possible “hotspots” for underwater anomalies.

Other Voices in the Debate

Burchett isn’t alone in raising eyebrows about underwater phenomena.

• Dr. Tim Gallaudet, a former NOAA administrator and U.S. Navy rear admiral, has discussed unexplained seafloor formations near Catalina Island, including a wedge‑shaped trench that doesn’t appear to have a natural geological explanation.

• Danny Sheehan, a well‑known lawyer and UFO disclosure advocate, has gone further, claiming to know the approximate locations of alleged underwater alien bases.

• Even Lauren Boebert, during a 2024 congressional hearing, referenced reports of UAPs entering and exiting the ocean, suggesting possible underwater infrastructure.

However, skeptics point out that none of these claims are backed by verifiable public data — only anecdotal reports and classified briefings.

Skepticism and Scientific Perspective

Critics argue that Burchett’s statements rely heavily on secondhand intelligence and unverified military anecdotes. Oceanographers note that sonar and radar anomalies can result from temperature gradients, pressure layers, or natural geological events.

Still, the idea of Unidentified Submerged Objects (USOs) isn’t new. The U.S. Navy has declassified several cases of radar and sonar contacts with fast‑moving underwater objects — though none have been confirmed as extraterrestrial.

What Makes This Claim Different

What sets Burchett’s comments apart is his confidence and public stance. He insists that the U.S. government is withholding critical information about UAPs and that Congress should demand full disclosure.

He also referenced a conversation with a high‑ranking official who told him, “Tim, they’re real.” Whether that means alien craft or advanced human technology remains unclear.

A Growing Pattern of Disclosure

Burchett’s remarks come amid a broader wave of UAP transparency efforts in Washington. Since 2023, multiple hearings have featured testimony from former military officials and intelligence officers claiming knowledge of non‑human craft and retrieved materials.

While official investigations remain cautious, the frequency of such statements from elected officials is fueling both public curiosity and scientific scrutiny.

Conclusion: Mystery Beneath the Waves

Whether or not alien bases truly exist beneath Earth’s oceans, the discussion reflects a growing willingness among U.S. lawmakers to question secrecy and demand transparency.

The oceans remain Earth’s last great frontier — vast, unexplored, and mysterious. If anything, Burchett’s claims remind us how little we truly know about what lies beneath the surface.

FAQ: Underwater Alien Bases and UAPs

1. Who is Tim Burchett?
Tim Burchett is a U.S. Congressman from Tennessee known for his outspoken views on government transparency and UFO disclosure.

2. What did he claim about underwater alien bases?
He said intelligence sources suggest there may be deep‑water alien bases on Earth’s ocean floor and that Navy personnel have tracked large, fast‑moving objects underwater.

3. Are there any confirmed underwater UFO sightings?
No confirmed evidence exists. Reports are anecdotal, and official investigations have not verified extraterrestrial origins.

4. What are UAPs or USOs?
UAPs (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena) are modern terms for UFOs. USOs (Unidentified Submerged Objects) refer to similar sightings underwater.

5. Why do some believe aliens could hide underwater?
The ocean covers over 70% of Earth and remains largely unexplored, making it a logical place for theorists to imagine hidden bases or advanced craft.

James Fox Drops UFO Bombshell

In a recent interview analyzed by Patrick from Vetted, Stanford professor Dr. Gary Nolan shared new insights into what insiders call the UFO legacy program—a network of secret efforts allegedly focused on studying recovered non‑human craft.

Nolan’s comments have reignited curiosity about international cooperation, retrieval missions, and the mysterious Varginha case in Brazil.

Inside the “Legacy Program”

According to Dr. Nolan, he has spoken directly with individuals who claim to have worked hands‑on with recovered craft.

• These insiders assert that multiple nations, including the Five Eyes alliance (U.S., U.K., Canada, Australia, and New Zealand), maintain agreements related to UFO recovery and research.

• Beyond those, Nolan says, there are also partnerships with France and other countries for similar purposes.

Patrick, the host, raises the question many viewers share: Who are these people? Are they still active in these programs? And when Nolan says “put their hands on craft,” does he mean literal contact or technical involvement?

Regardless, Nolan’s remarks suggest that UFO research is not confined to one nation—it’s part of a broader, cooperative framework.

The Varginha Case: A Brazilian Connection

Nolan also referenced the Varginha (often pronounced “Varinia”) case—a famous 1996 incident in Brazil investigated by filmmaker James Fox in his documentary Moment of Contact.

According to Fox’s research and Nolan’s comments:

• A U.S. retrieval team allegedly traveled to Brazil under a formal agreement to recover material from the crash.

• The operation reportedly took place in Campinas, a Brazilian research hub.

• Witnesses claimed that both craft debris and biological entities were transported to the U.S. via military aircraft.

While none of this has been officially confirmed, both Nolan and Fox emphasize that multiple eyewitnesses, including civilian and military personnel, have provided consistent accounts.

Unreleased Footage and Ongoing Investigations

Patrick also notes that James Fox is preparing a director’s cut of Moment of Contact with new details and possibly unseen footage from the Varginha case.

Fox has stated that:

• Video evidence from 1996 may still exist.

• He is actively trying to locate and secure that footage.

• Some witnesses are reportedly willing to cooperate if confidentiality and compensation are guaranteed.

The search for this footage could provide the first visual confirmation of what many consider one of the most compelling UFO recovery stories outside the United States.

International Agreements and UFO Retrievals

Nolan’s remarks also imply that the U.S. has standing arrangements with allied nations to retrieve downed anomalous objects wherever they land.

• These agreements would allow American teams to enter foreign territories under official cooperation.

• The recovered materials would then be studied in specialized facilities in the U.S.

If true, this would mean that UFO retrievals are a coordinated global effort, not isolated national programs.

Conclusion: A Web of Secrecy and Cooperation

Dr. Gary Nolan’s interview sheds light on a complex network of alleged legacy programs, retrieval missions, and international partnerships.

While skeptics demand tangible proof, Nolan’s credibility as a Stanford scientist makes his statements difficult to ignore.

👉 Whether you believe these claims or not, one thing is clear: the conversation about UFO transparency and global coordination is gaining momentum—and the truth may not stay hidden forever.

FAQ: Dr. Gary Nolan, UFO Legacy Programs & Retrievals

1. Who is Dr. Gary Nolan?

Dr. Gary Nolan is a professor of pathology at Stanford University, known for his research in immunology and his outspoken interest in UFOs and non‑human intelligence. He has analyzed materials allegedly linked to unidentified aerial phenomena (UAPs) and spoken with government insiders about secret research programs.

2. What is the “UFO legacy program”?

According to Nolan, the legacy program refers to classified efforts by the U.S. and allied nations to study recovered UFO materials and technology. These programs reportedly date back decades and involve both private contractors and government agencies.

3. What is the Varginha case?

The Varginha case is a 1996 incident in Brazil in which witnesses claimed to have seen a crashed UFO and strange, non‑human beings. Filmmaker James Fox explored the story in his documentary Moment of Contact. Nolan referenced the case as an example of international cooperation in UFO retrievals.

4. Did the U.S. have an agreement with Brazil about UFO recoveries?

Nolan suggested that formal agreements exist between the U.S. and countries like Brazil to allow American teams to recover anomalous objects found on foreign soil. While unconfirmed, similar arrangements are rumored to exist within the Five Eyes alliance.

5. What evidence supports these claims?

So far, most evidence is testimonial—from military witnesses, researchers, and insiders. However, filmmaker James Fox and others are actively seeking archival footage, documents, and physical samples that could verify the reports.

Whistleblower Dylan Borland Drops UFO Bombshell

When Dylan Borland, a former U.S. Air Force geospatial intelligence specialist, testified before Congress in September 2025, few expected his story to ignite such intense debate.

Borland’s claims—ranging from a firsthand UFO encounter at Langley Air Force Base to drawings allegedly classified into a Special Access Program (SAP)—have made him one of the most controversial figures in the modern UFO disclosure movement.

Now, following his two‑part interview on Jeremy Corbell and George Knapp’s Weaponized podcast, Borland’s story is being dissected by journalists, skeptics, and believers alike.

Who Is Dylan Borland?

Before becoming a whistleblower, Borland served as a geospatial intelligence specialist in the U.S. Air Force. His background gave him direct access to satellite imagery, reconnaissance data, and classified aerospace programs.

According to Borland, his life changed in 2012 while stationed at Langley Air Force Base, Virginia.

“I witnessed an approximately 100‑foot equilateral triangle craft taking off near a NASA hangar and flying within 100 feet of me,” he testified.

The craft, he said, was silent, composed of a fluid or dynamic material, and displayed flight characteristics far beyond known U.S. or foreign technology.

The Langley Encounter

Borland described the object as unlike anything he had ever seen in his military career:

• It hovered silently, then accelerated vertically without sound.

• The surface appeared to ripple like liquid metal.

• It emitted no exhaust, heat, or conventional propulsion signature.

“The technology was not consistent with U.S. or foreign capabilities,” he stated.

For Borland, that moment confirmed something extraordinary—that humanity is not alone, and that some branch of government or private industry may already know it.

Retaliation and Reprisals

After reporting the incident through official channels, Borland claims he faced over a decade of retaliation from government agencies:

• Career obstruction and demotions.

• Medical malpractice and psychological targeting.

• Workplace harassment and intimidation.

These alleged reprisals, he said, were part of a coordinated effort to silence him and others with direct knowledge of legacy UAP programs.

“Because of my direct knowledge, I’ve faced sustained reprisals for more than ten years,” Borland told Congress.

His story echoes that of other whistleblowers like David Grusch, who also alleged intimidation after disclosing information about hidden UAP programs.

The Brake Line Incident

In one of the most disturbing parts of his testimony, Borland claimed that someone sabotaged his car in an apparent attempt on his life.

“The police told me in confidence that my brake lines were cut,” he said. “They wanted it to look like a suicide.”

However, as Patrick from Vetted points out in his analysis, no official police report has confirmed that the brake lines were cut—raising questions about what really happened.

“If a cop said that, there’d be an attempted murder investigation,” Patrick notes. “So where’s the documentation?”

The mystery remains unresolved.

The Classified Drawings

Perhaps Borland’s most intriguing claim involves three drawings he submitted to government investigators.

“I provided three rudimentary drawings—one unclassified, and two that were immediately thrown into a SAP,” he said. “The two that were classified prove we are not alone.”

In U.S. defense terminology, a SAP (Special Access Program) is a compartmentalized project so secret that only a handful of cleared individuals can access it.

The idea that two simple drawings could be instantly classified suggests they contained information deemed highly sensitive—perhaps related to non‑human technology or reverse‑engineering programs.

Patrick, analyzing the interview, asks the obvious question:

“How can a hand‑drawn sketch be so important that it gets locked into a SAP? What could possibly be in those drawings?”

The “Swiss Cheese” Drawing

In the Vetted episode, Patrick humorously describes the only drawing shown publicly as resembling “Swiss cheese”—a rough sketch of a triangular craft with circular cutouts.

“Let’s be real—it looks like cheese,” he jokes. “So what made the other two so different that they were classified?”

Speculation abounds that the other two drawings may have included structural details, energy patterns, or symbols associated with the craft—details that might correspond to known classified materials.

The Bigger Picture: Whistleblowers and UFO Secrecy

Borland’s story fits into a growing pattern of UAP whistleblowers emerging since 2023.

Figures like David Grusch, Ryan Graves, and Lt. Cmdr. Alex Dietrich have all testified about unexplained encounters or secret programs.

The central allegation: that the U.S. government and private contractors are in possession of non‑human craft and materials, hidden under layers of corporate and military secrecy.

Borland’s testimony adds a personal dimension—one of fear, retaliation, and frustration with a system that silences those trying to speak truth.

Fear, Courage, and the Cost of Disclosure

During his congressional testimony, Borland was asked whether he feared for his life.

“If I say the wrong word, technically I can be charged with espionage,” he said. “Espionage is a death penalty. Whistleblowers have faced it. But I’m not scared of an agency coming to kill me.”

That statement underscores the high stakes of speaking publicly about classified information. Even hinting at what’s inside a SAP can lead to prosecution under national security laws.

Yet Borland insists that bringing truth to light is worth the risk.

“This is the most important issue of our lifetime,” he told Corbell and Knapp. “If what I know is true, it could change humanity forever.”

The Public Reaction

The UFO community has been divided.

• Believers hail Borland as another courageous insider confirming decades of rumors.

• Skeptics question the lack of physical evidence—especially the missing police report and the vague nature of the drawings.

Still, even critics admit that Borland’s credentials and demeanor lend him credibility. He doesn’t sound like a fantasist—he sounds like a man burdened by secrets.

What Comes Next

Patrick speculates that the Weaponized interview is only Part Two of a larger story, with a Part Three likely to reveal the unclassified drawing in full.

If that happens, analysts and enthusiasts will dissect every line, curve, and symbol—searching for clues about what Borland might have seen that night at Langley.

Until then, the mystery remains sealed inside a SAP—along with whatever evidence might “prove we’re not alone.”

Key Takeaways

• Dylan Borland claims to have witnessed a 100‑foot triangular craft at Langley AFB in 2012.

• His drawings of the craft were allegedly classified into a Special Access Program (SAP).

• He says he faced harassment and retaliation for over a decade after reporting the incident.

• A brake line sabotage incident remains unverified but adds to the intrigue.

• His story joins a wave of UAP whistleblower testimonies calling for transparency.

FAQ: Dylan Borland and the UFO Disclosure Movement

Q: Who is Dylan Borland?
A former U.S. Air Force geospatial intelligence specialist who became a whistleblower after witnessing a UFO at Langley AFB.

Q: What is a Special Access Program (SAP)?
A highly classified project that restricts access to a small number of cleared individuals, often used for advanced defense or intelligence work.

Q: Did Borland provide physical evidence?
So far, only one unclassified drawing has been shown publicly. The other two remain locked in a SAP.

Q: Has his story been verified?
Independent verification is limited, though his testimony was entered into the congressional record.

Q: Why does his story matter?
Because it adds firsthand military testimony to a growing body of evidence suggesting the U.S. government is concealing information about non‑human technology.

Exclusive Interview: Skywatcher Psionic Asset Mike Battista

More and more former military insiders are stepping forward with extraordinary claims about UFOs and non-human intelligences. One of the most intriguing voices is Michael Batista, a 32‑year‑old former Green Beret who recently shared his story in an interview with Patrick from Vetted.

From Special Forces to UFO Whistleblower

Batista served in the 3rd Special Forces Group before deciding to speak publicly about his experiences. According to him:

• He is certain that non-human intelligences are visiting Earth.

• He has had direct encounters with different beings, including small “Greys,” mantis-like entities, and taller humanoid figures.

• For him, this is not a matter of belief: “I know it’s true.”

Psionics and the Skywatcher Project

One of Batista’s most startling revelations is his involvement in the Skywatcher Project as a psionic asset.

• He describes psionic summonings—the ability to intentionally call UFO phenomena into the sky.

• Batista claims he can make objects appear “at will.”

• Multiple sightings were reportedly witnessed and documented with night-vision equipment.

Although bound by NDAs (non-disclosure agreements), he hints that NASA and military representatives have been present during landings.

Connection to Dr. Steven Greer

A turning point for Batista came at Dr. Steven Greer’s Disclosure event in 2023 in Washington, D.C. There, he connected with people tied to the Skywatcher program and dove deeper into the world of UFO research and classified projects.

Why He Went Public

Batista stresses that he isn’t trying to convince skeptics. Instead, his goals are to:

• Share his story openly,

• Encourage others to research for themselves,

• Contribute to a broader, serious discussion about UFOs.

His appearance on News Nation brought significant attention—something he sees as necessary to push the conversation into the mainstream.

Conclusion: An Unusual Witness

Michael Batista is not a typical UFO witness. As a former Green Beret and alleged participant in psionic experiments, his testimony adds a unique layer to the ongoing UFO debate.

👉 Whether you believe his claims or not, they highlight how the subject of UFOs and non-human intelligences is increasingly being taken seriously—even within military circles.

FAQ: Michael Batista, UFOs & Psionics

1. Who is Michael Batista?

Michael Batista is a former U.S. Army Green Beret who claims to have had direct encounters with non-human intelligences and to have worked as a psionic asset in the secretive Skywatcher Project.

2. What is the Skywatcher Project?

According to Batista, Skywatcher is a classified program involving psionics—the use of mental or psychic abilities to summon or interact with UFO phenomena. He says some of these events were witnessed and recorded.

3. What does “psionic summoning” mean?

Psionic summoning refers to the alleged ability to intentionally call UFOs or anomalous objects into the sky through focused mental or psychic energy. Batista claims to have demonstrated this multiple times.

4. Did Michael Batista work with Dr. Steven Greer?

Batista attended Dr. Steven Greer’s Disclosure event in 2023, where he connected with others involved in UFO research. While not formally part of Greer’s team, the event was a turning point in his decision to go public.

5. Why did Batista decide to speak out?

He says his goal is not to convince skeptics but to share his story, encourage independent research, and contribute to a more serious public discussion about UFOs and non-human intelligences.

Ross Coulthart Speaks Out Against Jake Barber & Skywatcher

If you’ve been following the world of UFOs and UAPs (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena), you know that the search for answers often ends in more questions. The latest buzz—coming from trusted voices like Ross Coulthart and dedicated independent reporters—centers around an explosive claim: a program called Skywatcher may have witnessed a real landing of a mysterious craft, with NASA and military witnesses present! If your curiosity is piqued, you’re not alone. Let’s dive into what’s really going on, why there’s so much secrecy, and what this all means for the future of UFO research.

The Skywatcher Claim—Why It Matters Now

UFO stories are a dime a dozen, but this one sticks for several reasons. Patrick, the face behind Vetted, first reported on a behind-the-scenes tip from Carl Crusher—a well-known figure in the field. According to Carl, Skywatcher (a team both well-funded and serious about studying these mysteries) managed not only to summon a craft using advanced, almost psychic (psionic) techniques, but actually witnessed it landing. Crucially, both NASA and military representatives were supposedly there to see it happen.

This isn’t just another blurry light in the sky: it’s direct interaction, witnessed by credible authorities, kept under wraps for reasons that only seem to fuel more speculation. The viral clip at the heart of the storm—originally featured in Patrick’s coverage—set off a wave of intrigue, skepticism, and genuine excitement across the community.

Ross Coulthart Confirms…Sort Of

The claim got even more attention after respected investigative journalist Ross Coulthart addressed it on NewsNation during a Q&A. When asked point-blank about the alleged Skywatcher landing, Ross didn’t deny it. Instead, he confirmed he’d heard similar stories—Carl Crusher had even mentioned it to him personally. While Ross hadn’t seen video evidence or received "official" confirmation, his acknowledgment added a new layer of credibility to the rumor.

But here’s the catch: Ross echoed a growing frustration among UFO enthusiasts and professionals alike—Skywatcher’s lack of transparency. He has repeatedly invited Skywatcher’s leaders to speak publicly about their findings, stressing the need for open disclosure. So far, his invitations, like those from so many others, have gone unanswered. Where there should be updates and interviews, there’s only silence.

The Secrecy Problem—Transparency vs. Teasing

Why would an organization dedicated to uncovering the truth keep so much of it locked away? Patrick’s speculation, echoed by Ross, is that Skywatcher may be holding out to release their findings on their own terms. They’ve previously posted films and videos online, and there’s hope the next one will finally address the psionics episode at the center of all the suspense.

For the broader UFO community, this approach is a double-edged sword. On the one hand, it’s understandable—creating detailed, compelling media presentations takes time. On the other, every delay breeds skepticism. If NASA and the military really witnessed a controlled UAP landing, wouldn’t the urgency for public disclosure outweigh any desire for cinematic buildup?

As Patrick notes, this “relationship and then radio silence” pattern is not new for Skywatcher. It’s left people like Tim Taylor and now even prominent journalists like Ross Coulthart in the dark. The result? The community is left speculating, with tantalizing leaks and half-stories fueling both hope and frustration.

What’s Next—Will the Truth Land in Public?

Right now, the ball is firmly in Skywatcher’s court. Will they step forward and share their evidence—if it exists? Will NASA or military personnel verify the claims, or will this become just one more rumor in the swirling universe of UFO lore?

Ross’s position is clear: transparency is essential. The public’s hunger for the truth about UAPs is growing, and organizations like Skywatcher have a duty to the people to shed light on what they’ve found. Patrick, for his part, promises more reporting and investigation—so the story is far from over.

A Personal Touch — Stories from Everyday People

One thing that grounds all this intrigue is the flood of personal stories from ordinary people. Patrick has started taking voicemails from listeners, proof that interest in these topics is at an all-time high. One such call came from an Ohio resident sharing their chilling sighting of an enormous, oddly shaped craft back in July 2002. Details like strange lights, a humming engine, and the sudden appearance of a rapid-flying jet all add to the tapestry of what people are experiencing but often can’t explain.

This grassroots storytelling brings something crucial: it’s not just researchers or journalists who are asking questions—it’s your neighbors, your friends, your family. And every time a new experience is shared, the pressure mounts for those with information to step into the light.

The Takeaway — Why It Matters, and Why We Can’t Give Up

If there’s anything to learn from the Skywatcher saga and the dogged efforts of people like Patrick and Ross Coulthart, it’s this: transparency must win out. Whether you’re a skeptic, a believer, or just someone with a healthy curiosity, questions about what’s flying in our skies deserve real answers—not just rumors and teasers.

Keep watching this story. Check out the full interviews and viral clips, follow the work of independent reporters, and keep sharing your own experiences. In the end, disclosure comes not just from organizations or officials, but from a community that refuses to let big secrets stay hidden forever.

After all, every day is a gift—and every question is worth asking. Stay curious, stay skeptical, and above all, stay tuned. The truth may be closer than any of us think.