Diana Pasulka Pushes Back in NEW New York Times Interview

What's up, fellow seekers? If you've ever found yourself scratching your head about the seemingly never-ending mystery that is the UFO phenomenon, you're not alone. The world of unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) is awash with whistleblowers, government denials, secret programs, and everyday people trying to make sense of it all. In a recent stretch of engaging conversation between Diana Pasulka and The New York Times, these tangled threads were pulled apart, revealing just how complicated—and fascinating—this quest for answers truly is.

The Sedona Backdrop and a Fresh Perspective

Let’s set the stage: Patrick, your on-the-road guide from Vetted, reports in from mystical Sedona, dogs in the background and documentary cameras rolling. It's not your everyday studio-bound video but a peek into a real-life adventure. Amidst this, Patrick breaks down a riveting New York Times interview with Dr. Diana Walsh Pasulka, whose book "American Cosmic" delves deep into the intersection of UFOs, religious experience, and modern technoculture. This wasn’t your run-of-the-mill interview—here was a neutral platform offering real pushback and space for honest reflection. The result? An eye-opening conversation for skeptics, believers, and the endlessly curious.

When Government Employees Become UFO Enthusiasts

We all picture government whistleblowers as covert agents with classified dossiers. But as Diana described, those who reached out to her weren’t Hollywood caricatures. They were scientists, engineers, and employees from places like NASA or major aerospace companies—people with day jobs as mission controllers or technical specialists. What united them? A private (sometimes off-the-books) passion for investigating strange aerial phenomena.

The twist? Many referred to their investigative work as their “hobby job”—not official government assignments, but independent passion projects they kept quiet about. Some would scout alleged UFO crash sites and collect scraps for scientific analysis, always walking the fine line between their public duties and private pursuits. It’s a shadow world within the shadowy, where curiosity and duty blend.

Layers of Secrecy and Public Confusion

Things get even more perplexing when you realize how many layers these stories possess. On one hand, there’s the public record: since the 2017 New York Times exposé, we know the US government has at least officially acknowledged the existence of anomalous aerial events. There are videos, classified reports, and even Congressional testimony. On the other hand, there are countless whispers, private testimonials, and claims of secret programs holding materials from “other worlds.”

That’s where confusion takes root. As Diana pointed out, for each whistleblower or credible military official stepping forward to affirm the existence of secret studies or even nonhuman artifacts, there is another official source denying any such ongoing programs. For the average curious citizen, it’s no wonder the waters are so muddy. Should we trust the government’s public face, the passionate insiders turned hobbyist investigators, or the whistleblowers who risk their reputations by speaking out?

Diana’s own journey mirrors this tension. Even after embedding with researchers and writing an entire book, she didn’t immediately leap to belief. She stayed open, skeptical, but above all, curious. For her, and for many trying to untangle the contradictory information, the desire for clarity is endless—and the outright lack of transparency only makes the hunt more compelling.

Beyond the Headlines: Why It Matters to All of Us

At the heart of this dialogue is a universal challenge: how do we navigate a field where information is at once everywhere—and yet so frustratingly elusive? The phenomenon touches on more than just the possible existence of extraterrestrials; it strikes at our need for truth, community, and wonder. Whether it’s government employees out on “hobby” investigations, skeptical scientists, or ordinary folks keeping an eye on the night sky, we’re all drawn to the mystery for reasons both personal and collective.

The New York Times interview, as highlighted by Patrick, stands out because it asks the tough questions and doesn’t just let claims slide. It interrogates motives, clarifies definitions (is it government work or a private obsession?), and demands accountability. Yet, as Diana reflects, the confusion is more than just frustrating—it’s a deliberate byproduct of the way our institutions release (or obscure) information. Until there’s true transparency, curiosity is our best guide.

A Call to Curiosity (and a Little Bit of Skepticism)

So what do we take away from all this? We’re reminded that interest in the unexplained is a profoundly human trait. For every person discouraged by confusion or secrecy, there’s another who finds the unknown irresistible. As Patrick’s Sedona adventure shows, sometimes exploration means setting aside easy answers and embracing the journey—the late-night sky watches, the “out there” experiments, and the thoughtful conversations that keep us asking, “What if?”

If you’re hungry for more than just speculation, check out the linked New York Times video interview. It’s a masterclass in how to handle complex topics with honesty and rigor. Until then, remember: in the quest for understanding, every question counts, and every day is a gift. Keep searching, keep questioning, and—who knows—maybe one day the truth will be just as strange as the stories that keep us curious.

Like, subscribe, and never be afraid to ask big questions. Peace!

Jeremy Corbell REVEALS Location of Crashed UFO

If you’re even just a little into UFOs, whistleblowers, or the never-ending mystery of government secrets, this week’s update from Patrick at Vetted will have you buzzing. There’s controversy, hidden motives, cryptic tweets, and—of course—rumors of shadowy bases where the government might just be hiding… well, who really knows? Buckle up and let’s dig into what’s actually going on, why so many people are frustrated, and what it all might mean for the search for the truth.

A Road Trip, a Documentary, and a Big Reveal

Patrick—your friendly neighborhood investigator and host—opens from the road, literally on the journey to Sedona to work on a documentary about psionics. While details about his documentary shoot are still under wraps, you can feel the sense of anticipation. It’s clear: something fascinating is about to unfold. But before the film drops, Patrick brings us into the world of high-stakes whistleblowing and online drama that’s taken the UFO community by storm.

When Whistleblowers Name Names: Are We Crossing a Line?

In this latest saga, Jeremy Corbell—a familiar name in the world of advanced aerospace and government secrets—took things up a notch on his podcast, Weaponized. Corbell chose to publicly recite the exact addresses of facilities belonging to breakthrough aerospace companies like Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman. These plants are legendary among conspiracy theorists, suspected by some to house everything from exotic materials to, perhaps, the leftovers of crash-landed UFOs.

The move? It’s bold. Maybe reckless. Patrick points out that while these addresses are probably publicly available if you know where to look, shouting them out to a massive audience changes the game. What does Corbell expect people to do with these details? Will ordinary folks show up at the gates hoping to glimpse a secret? And more importantly, is this kind of exposure helpful to the cause, or does it risk unwanted chaos and confusion?

Many in the community are scratching their heads. Some think it’s just stoking curiosity, while others worry it might invite attention—good and bad—that these places don’t need. There’s a bigger question lurking: what exactly does Corbell hope for? Are these revelations breadcrumbs for Senators (as he suggests), or is it meant to spur grassroots investigation?

Cryptic Tweets and the Frustration of Not Knowing

Just as the community is recovering from Corbell’s dramatic address drop, attention swings to Matthew Brown, a recent whistleblower who appeared on Weaponized. Brown’s recent tweet is loaded with anxiety and ambiguity: "The strain is too much and there was no support. Hope you all enjoy the free entertainment. We are not free."

Fans, researchers, and fellow podcasters all reacted, many voicing a shared frustration—why all the riddles, all the hinting at explosive revelations, but never quite crossing the line into clear confirmation?

Astral, a voice from the podcast Need to Know, hit the nail on the head: are whistleblowers like Brown actually going to testify before Congress, or will it all remain smoke and mirrors? The lack of clarity and the persistent ambiguity are wearing thin on everyone chasing the truth.

Why All the Cryptic Messaging?

Patrick unpacks it: Brown may be using evasive language and indirect hints to protect himself. After all, the risks for whistleblowers are real, and revealing too much might put him in harm’s way. Maybe he hopes investigators or the public will piece things together without him having to spell it out—avoiding direct exposure.

Still, Patrick acknowledges the tension. On one side are people desperate for answers and action—something concrete. On the other: whistleblowers navigating a minefield of personal safety and legal risk. Both perspectives make sense, which is why this dance between disclosure and secrecy continues.

What’s the Takeaway? The Search Is Ongoing

Although nobody left this video with locked-tight answers, Patrick closes with optimism and encouragement. The quest for truth about UFOs, government secrets, and witnesses willing to speak up is far from over. Sometimes you get hints, sometimes you hit walls of confusion, and sometimes, just sometimes, you get bombshells.

For now, Patrick promises to keep sharing updates as his documentary work takes him to new locations. He appreciates the community’s patience and engagement, knowing that real breakthroughs often take time. One thing is for sure—this story isn’t over and the questions keep coming. If you’re along for the ride, stay tuned and stay curious. Because as Patrick reminds us, every day is a gift, and together, we might just get closer to the answers we seek.

Bombshell Allegations by Ross Coulthart

If you’ve ever found yourself captivated by the mysteries of UFOs, government secrecy, and the ongoing battle for transparency, you’re not alone. On a recent road trip through the iconic Southwestern landscapes—Roswell, Arizona, Utah—the creator behind Vetted, Patrick, took a pause to dive into perhaps one of the most pressing questions in the UFO community: are key members of Congress actively suppressing disclosure about secret UFO programs? With fresh rumors, frustrated whistleblowers, and even congressional intrigue, this video isn’t just a travel log, but a front-row seat to a controversy that may shape how we think about government transparency and the search for extraterrestrial truth.

A Road Trip with a Bigger Mission

Patrick’s journey through places like Roswell isn’t just about breathtaking red rocks or quirky roadside stops. He’s filming a documentary on psionics and making sure to keep his Vetted followers updated along the way. What makes this episode stand out isn’t just the scenery, but the show’s relentless pursuit of truth—even from the road. As Patrick hits each destination, he brings a dose of real-time investigation into claims that certain U.S. senators have insider knowledge about government UFO programs and are now actively keeping this information from the public.

The Ross Coulthart Allegations: Senators in the Shadows?

The main event in this episode is a provocative clip from Ross Coulthart, a respected journalist in the disclosure movement. Ross doubles down on his claim that some sitting senators know much more about UFO recovery and reverse engineering projects than they let on. The real kicker? He accuses these lawmakers of not simply keeping quiet, but actively blocking efforts to bring UFO secrets to the public and holding up Congressional hearings that could change the narrative forever.

Ross’s argument is direct: certain senators have been “read into” these classified programs—meaning they’ve received high-level briefings most of Congress hasn't. According to him, this privileged group sees keeping the lid on UFO information as their patriotic duty, justified by national security or fear of public panic. Some of these suspicions, Ross says, even reach up to the Trump administration. He implies that the problem isn’t just ignorance, but deliberate “obfuscation” to keep Americans in the dark.

Skepticism and the Need for Proof

While Ross’s allegations raise eyebrows, Patrick plays the necessary skeptic. “These are huge claims,” he points out. After all, implicating sitting senators in a cover-up is a serious charge. Patrick urges Ross to back up these assertions with proof before naming names. After all, accusations of treason or betrayal at this level can’t be taken lightly—especially when you’re dealing with national security and public trust.

Even more intriguing is the revolving-door nature of Congress. Senators come and go, so what does it really mean to be ‘read in’ to such a profound secret? And do these alleged conspirators keep their silence after leaving office? These are the questions Patrick throws back to his viewers, sparking thoughtful debate and inviting speculation in the comments.

Transparency Clash: Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna Weighs In

The controversy heats up when Patrick highlights the response from Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna—a vocal member pushing for UFO transparency. Luna clarifies that she isn’t a senator and has been attempting to bring informed witnesses into closed-door sessions, only to have participants withdraw at the last minute with mysterious illnesses or scheduling conflicts. This recurring pattern raises legitimate frustrations among advocates of disclosure. Who’s really holding things up—the supposed insiders or simply a lack of will among potential witnesses?

Luna’s insistence on hearing firsthand testimony—not just stories from secondhand sources—adds another layer to the puzzle. She and figures like Jeremy Corbell want individuals who’ve actually worked on or seen the alleged alien technology to testify before Congress. Yet, every time a hearing approaches, witnesses pull out, citing fear for their safety. While some level of caution is understandable given the gravity of the topic, Patrick rightly observes that these delays can appear suspicious, especially when some of these same voices share their stories publicly on podcasts instead.

The Challenge of Whistleblowers: Fact or Convenient Excuse?

The conversation then turns to the role of whistleblowers. While advocates claim there are multiple credible figures ready to testify about direct contact with non-human technology or beings, logistical hurdles and personal concerns have consistently prevented these groundbreaking stories from being shared in the appropriate forums. Patrick raises a fair devil’s advocate point: if witnesses feel too threatened to talk under oath, why are they comfortable discussing their experiences on public platforms? Transparency doesn’t rest on stories—it requires clear, documented testimony that can withstand public and governmental scrutiny.

What Happens Next?

So where does all this leave us? Are senators actively hiding UFO information from the public? Is there a conspiracy or just bureaucratic dysfunction? Patrick’s tone is hopeful yet grounded; he encourages viewers to stay engaged and to keep asking questions. He expects Ross Coulthart to eventually reveal names, and he hopes that, when the time comes, it will be accompanied by the proof necessary to spur real action.

Meanwhile, the promised congressional hearings remain in limbo—supposedly pushed from July to September over confusion about who would testify. Whether or not key whistleblowers step forward, and members of Congress are held accountable for alleged stonewalling, remains to be seen. What’s certain is that the push for UFO transparency is alive and well, fueled by investigators, advocates, and everyday citizens who refuse to let the topic fade into obscurity.

Conclusion: Stay Curious, Stay Skeptical

In the end, Patrick’s message from the road is a call for critical thinking. Don’t jump to conclusions, but don’t stop demanding answers either. It’s easy to be swept up in sensational allegations, but real disclosure takes patience, courage, and an unwavering commitment to truth. As the investigation continues, keep your eyes on the horizon—because, as Patrick says, every day is a gift, and perhaps one day soon, so will be the answers we seek.

Jesse Michels Drops Wildest Interview He's Ever Done

If you’ve spent any time on the fringes of YouTube’s UFO community, you know things can get wild fast. Enter Jay Anderson of Project Unity, recent guest on Jesse Michaels' podcast, with an episode that weaves deep government intrigue and UFO lore in true cliffhanger fashion. Throw in comedian Kurt Metzger, and what could have been a run-of-the-mill discussion about UFOs becomes something so packed with colorful commentary, wild stories, and deep dives into esoteric claims that you can’t help but get pulled in.

But at the heart of this episode lies a tantalizing question: What do true government insiders know about UFOs, secret technology, and the ultimate question of "Are we alone?". To answer this, Jesse and Jay dissect Jay’s bombshell interview with one of the most connected intelligence officials in US history -- Admiral Bobby Ray Inman. Buckle up as we break down what makes this episode a must-listen for anyone even remotely interested in UFOs, government secrecy, or just a good old-fashioned podcast showdown.

Behind the Curtain: The Influence of Scientology and Secret Societies

The conversation starts off with a mixture of humor and serious speculation as Kurt Metzger raises eyebrows about the alleged influence of Scientology in the UFO community. The trio jokes about infiltration, with Kurt’s comedic interruptions making for difficult but entertaining listening. But beneath the laughs, there’s a real discussion about the presence of secret societies, conditioning, and the “occult prison” of society — all suggesting that the UFO community is not free from the same games of power and secrecy that swirl around more mainstream topics.

This idea of social conditioning and hidden influence primes listeners for the deeper themes of the episode: who is controlling the narrative, and how deep does the rabbit hole actually go?

The Art of the Interview: Comedy, Esoterica, and High Stakes Conversations

The podcast’s energy isn’t just about content; it’s about style. With Kurt’s irreverent banter about childhood education programs and Jay’s encyclopedic knowledge of UFO lore, the conversation ranges from comedic asides to very real insights. The meta-commentary on production quality provides a subtle lesson: good showmanship doesn’t guarantee truth, but it does show that even the wildest subjects can benefit from a little polish.

Yet beneath the jokes is an almost palpable anticipation—because Jay Anderson is about to spill on one of the most intriguing interviews in UFO research: his sit-down with Admiral Bobby Ray Inman, a man whose résumé reads like a who’s-who of shadowy government agencies (NSA, CIA, DIA, Naval Intelligence, you name it). The stakes? Nothing less than the truth about secret programs, recovered alien technology, and legendary black projects.

Unlocking the Admiral’s Vault: Bobby Ray Inman Speaks

Here’s where things get truly interesting. Jay Anderson recounts how a strange twist of fate (or synchronicity) led to an interview with one of the highest-ranking intelligence officials to ever lay hands on classified UFO files. Inman, who has run everything from the NSA to the CIA to Naval Intelligence, takes the hot seat — and Jay presses him with both historical inquiries and forward-looking questions about UFOs.

One highlight is the reference to Inman’s decades-old conversation with famed UFO researcher Bob Exler. Back in the 80s, Inman mused that, over time, military technology once considered untouchable might eventually be made public for research. Did he mean "alien spacecraft"? Inman, now, is quick to firmly deny any knowledge of recovered UFOs — but his forthrightness feels almost too rehearsed. Even Jay can’t help but notice a distinct change in the admiral’s demeanor: open and conversational until the topic of UFOs comes up, then suddenly rigid and defensive. It’s as though the subject itself is wrapped in the kind of secrecy only those at the very top could truly understand.

The tic tac incident comes up. Inman, while expressing skepticism about alien visitation, acknowledges the level of secrecy around projects at places like Lockheed Martin's Skunk Works. The implication: even the wildest claims might not be as far-fetched as they seem—if you know where to look, or who to talk to.

Decoding the Message: Truth, Denial, and the Limits of Disclosure

Was Inman hiding something? Was he just reflecting decades of government habit, or did he drop subtle hints for keen listeners to decode? Jay and Jesse encourage viewers to listen closely to Inman’s words and body language. Was his “high confidence” that there’s no other life in the galaxy simply scientific conservatism, or coded language masking a deeper reality?

Throughout the interview, references to other legendary figures and claims abound—Ben Rich of Lockheed Martin reportedly hinting “anything you can imagine, we already know how to do,” and stories of technologies locked up in black projects that could ‘take an act of God’ to reveal. Jay doesn’t see these claims as empty exaggerations; rather, he feels that the tone, the caution, and the rare willingness of someone at Inman's level to even speak on camera suggest layers of meaning only the truly initiated might catch.

Final Takeaways: Why This Episode Matters

What makes Jesse Michaels’ podcast with Jay Anderson and Kurt Metzger extraordinary isn’t just the wild claims or the legendary guests. It’s that the episode offers a rare window into how information about the most mysterious topics—UFOs, black projects, national security—is handled, interpreted, and ultimately shared (or not shared) with the public.

We witness the collision of comedy and serious inquiry, the clash between high production values and rough-edged authenticity, and most of all, the struggle to extract any real truth from a system built on secrecy.

For viewers and readers, the biggest lesson is not to take any one statement—no matter how authoritative—as gospel, but to pay attention to the nuance, the hesitation, and the context in which information is given. As Jay’s experience with Admiral Inman shows, sometimes what’s not said rings loudest of all.

If you’re hungry for more, check out the full interviews—there’s always more between the lines, and, as these insiders prove, the search for truth is just getting started.

Keep questioning, keep watching, and remember: every day is a gift. See you next time on Vetted.

Chris Ramsay Drops Explosive Theory about the UFO Phenomena

If you’ve ever found yourself entranced by late-night discussions about UFOs, alien encounters, and the mysteries lurking beneath our oceans, you’re in for a ride. The conversation between Chris Ramsay from Area 52 and Michael from Third Eye Drops, recently featured and explored by Patrick of Vetted, dives deep into one of the most compelling and imaginative theories about UFO phenomena: What if what we witness in our skies and seas isn’t the product of a singular otherworldly intelligence, but rather the output of an elaborate, automated system—an intergalactic immune response, if you will?

Let’s pull back the curtain and break down the mind-bending ideas, fascinating analogies, and top-shelf skepticism that swirl around this theory, and examine why it’s as intriguing as it is unsettling.

A New Perspective: UFOs as Purpose-Built Machines

Chris Ramsay brings to the table a theory that reframes everything you thought you knew about UFOs. Rather than viewing these mysterious craft as singular, all-purpose alien vehicles, Ramsay suggests they are custom-made machines, each designed for a specific mission—much like our own bombers and reconnaissance aircraft are distinct and targeted in their functions. Some have speculated that what whistleblowers describe as ‘mobile construction units’ live in our oceans, continually building and ejecting different craft on demand, tailored to their intended task.

This “built to spec” approach also extends to the entities found within these crafts. Eyewitness reports and abduction accounts often note that these beings seem designed specifically for their roles: genderless, without the need for food, teeth, or basic comforts. In fact, they are so intertwined with their ships that, when separated, they reportedly do not survive. The ships themselves, stripped of any personal touches, are more akin to tools than vehicles—a purposeful, utterly utilitarian means to an unknown end.

Von Neumann Probes: Seeding Life Across the Cosmos

Ramsay’s ideas closely echo the concept of von Neumann probes—self-replicating robotic machines theorized as a way for an advanced civilization to explore or seed the galaxy. Just as trees spread seeds by the millions, hoping a few find fertile soil, so too might an advanced civilization scatter billions of tiny machines across the universe, each capable of landing, self-replicating, and building monitoring systems tailored to local environments.

Science communicator Michio Kaku, referenced in the discussion, explains that these nanomachines could, in theory, use planetary resources to create more probes—acting not unlike viruses, spreading, adapting, and establishing themselves wherever conditions are right. If you ever wondered why Earth’s life is so puzzle-piece diverse, teeming with everything from cephalopods to kangaroos, maybe it’s the result of cosmic tinkering on a grand scale.

System or Sentience? What’s Guiding the Phenomenon?

The heart of this discussion is the deeply fascinating question: is the UFO phenomenon a cleverly guided intelligence or a vast, automated system? Michael from Third Eye Drops takes this even deeper, pondering whether what we see is only the surface—possibly the immune response of a galaxy-spanning biological or tech-based system. Just as our own bodies respond to threats automatically, what if UFO encounters, abductions, and even the terrifying warnings given to contactees are simply systemic responses to human actions?

He draws this analogy further by comparing our attempts to interact with these entities through psychic means or provocative military maneuvers (such as the rumored ‘Operation Interloper’) to setting off white blood cells in a larger organism. The eerily consistent reports of abduction procedures—sterile, emotionless, focused on genetics or reproduction—seem less like the acts of a sentient being and more like repetitive, automated processes.

Exploring the Layers: Consciousness, Pattern Recognition, and the Human Psyche

But what if there’s more? Michael also points to the ‘multifaceted’ presentation of the phenomenon throughout history—appearing as angels, fairies, or even the Virgin Mary to fit the cultural context. Could the real ‘control system’ be something embedded in human consciousness itself, prodding us toward evolution or manipulating us for inscrutable reasons? As our understanding and technology grow, so too does the sophistication of these encounters. Are we being led, tested, or merely monitored as part of a universal experiment?

This brings up another psychological layer—our innate need to find patterns and fit everything into a grand unified theory. As appealing as it is to circle everything under one neat system, both Patrick and Michael acknowledge that the phenomenon is likely a confusing blend of technologies, entities, and perhaps even projections from ourselves.

Skepticism and Hope: The Divide in the UFO Community

The blog doesn’t shy away from the frustrations many feel in the search for ‘disclosure.’ With stories outstripping hard evidence and official statements often muddying rather than clarifying, it’s easy to grow skeptical. Patrick addresses this head-on, echoing the feelings of many: the search for the truth is both exhilarating and exasperating. For those feeling lost in the haze of speculation, Patrick offers a friendly reminder to manage expectations and keep an open mind—sometimes the journey really is just as important as the destination.

What Does This All Mean for Us?

To wrap it all up, the conversation is a rich tapestry of intrigue, skepticism, and wonder. Whether you interpret UFO phenomena as evidence of advanced alien civilizations, automated Von Neumann-like systems, or a mirror into our own consciousness, one thing is clear: the allure of the unknown continues to beckon us. The search for answers drives not only scientific progress but also fuels the imagination, urging us to look skyward—and inward—with renewed curiosity.

Maybe, at the end of the day, the true takeaway is that every strange encounter and unanswered question keeps the engine of human curiosity running. Our quest for understanding might very well be the greatest mystery and achievement of all.

So, as you ponder what’s lurking under our oceans or zipping through our skies, remember: every day is a gift, and every question opens a new door. Stay curious, vettors. The universe is waiting.

Dr. Garry Nolan SHOCKS Jordan Peterson in Wild Interview

If you thought the world of UFOs (or UAPs, Unidentified Aerial Phenomena) had settled down, think again. Dr. Gary Nolan, a prominent scientist and fearless voice in the field of UFO research, recently sat down with Dr. Jordan Peterson for a conversation that’s sparked fresh debate, intrigue, and even concern among those tracking the ongoing mystery of what’s happening in our skies. From claims of government threats to new technology that could be pulling “anomalous objects” out of hiding, the interview is a must-listen for anyone interested in the search for truth about non-human intelligence.

Let’s unpack what was said, why it matters, and what it might mean for the future of UFO disclosure and public understanding of the phenomenon.

White House Threats and the Cost of Speaking Out

Dr. Gary Nolan dropped a bombshell: he claims he was “threatened with lethal force” by someone connected to the White House for speaking too openly about the UAP question. To most, this would sound like the stuff of conspiracy thrillers, but Dr. Nolan isn’t exactly your typical fringe theorist—he’s a Stanford professor and renowned researcher.

Nolan recounts receiving a phone call, after accidentally referencing information he “wasn’t supposed to know,” in which he was told that if he kept speaking out, “lethal force is operable.” Far from dismissing the experience, Nolan called a reporter to document it and has since referenced it publicly. Whether you believe such a threat was credible or not, it highlights the immense pressures, and risks, faced by those at the intersection of sensitive scientific evidence and government secrecy.

What’s Skywatcher Doing That’s So Different?

The interview also delved into Dr. Nolan’s work with Skywatcher, a privately funded project setting up sophisticated sensors in remote locations to collect data on anomalies—everything from military drones to objects that don’t act like anything we know. The approach here is clear: don’t wait for “daddy government” to green-light research. Instead, use science and technology to capture and analyze all aerial phenomena. Nolan, acting as a chief scientific adviser, emphasizes the importance of having hard data and independent verification, and not simply relying on videos or eyewitness accounts that flood social media.

Skywatcher’s goals initially centered on bringing UFO disclosure to the American public, aiming for a data-driven approach to a field too often clouded by speculation. Over time, the mission has evolved, with Skywatcher expanding its menu of services—now working in concert with government agencies and private industry to enhance airspace security and awareness.

The Mysterious ‘Dog Whistle’ Technology

Among the more intriguing pieces of the Skywatcher puzzle is the so-called “dog whistle” technology. Details are closely guarded, but according to Nolan and others involved, Skywatcher possesses a unique electromagnetic sequence capable of attracting or summoning certain aerial objects. Team member James Fowler reportedly engineered this system after noticing unusual effects during past military operations. These aren’t just speculative stories: the group claims repeatable results, with multiple anomalous sightings attributed to the use of this technology.

Is this the key to reliable, repeatable UFO encounters, or simply a novel way of drawing out classified or experimental drones? The truth remains elusive, but Skywatcher is adamant about continued research and cautious about the potential consequences of pushing these technological boundaries. For them, the risk is not just scientific but potentially geopolitical—and the need for responsibility is top of mind.

Are We Alone? Dr. Nolan’s Provisional Conclusion

Perhaps the most provocative aspect of the interview is Dr. Nolan’s frank assessment of the phenomenon itself. “There’s something nonhuman here and it’s been here for a long time is my provisional conclusion,” he tells Dr. Peterson. He is quick to temper this with scientific humility, emphasizing that his views are based on accumulated evidence and not wishful thinking or sci-fi fantasy.

Nolan calls for an end to reflexive skepticism and sarcasm among his academic peers, arguing that with thousands of credible reports worldwide, there’s undeniably something that merits a real, scientific investigation. Importantly, he points out that the critical question isn’t “is there something here?” but “can there be something here?”—and from a purely scientific, cosmological standpoint, the answer is a clear yes, given the age and size of the universe.

Skeptics often question why so many “alien” beings reportedly look so much like humans—a point Nolan himself acknowledges is puzzling from a genetics perspective. But regardless, he insists there is enough credible evidence to warrant a full-scale, transparent scientific inquiry.

From Parliament Briefings to Public Pressure

Dr. Nolan hasn’t limited his advocacy to American audiences. He’s briefed both the Canadian Parliament and the European Parliament on his findings, emphasizing that these issues transcend borders and secrecy in one country can’t keep the rest of the world in the dark forever. As other governments become aware of and admit to their own military encounters with anomalies, the pressure builds for a more unified, global approach to UAP research.

The Expanding Horizon of UFO Disclosure

This conversation—alongside ongoing documentaries, documentaries, and increased media coverage—marks an inflection point. Skywatcher’s evolution from a group with a single focus (UFO disclosure) to a multi-dimensional player in aerial data collection reflects the broader trend: the field is professionalizing, and the roles of government, private science, and citizen journalism are changing fast.

Yet, as with any disruptive field, there’s a risk that initial ideals get diluted as new agendas and stakeholders come aboard. The hope, as expressed by many longtime advocates, is that the original mission—transparency and data-driven disclosure—remains at the forefront.

Why Now? The Big Question

One question posed by viewers and echoed by Patrick, the host, is why this surge of disclosures and government hearings is happening now. Why, in the midst of new congressional attention and whistleblower reports, are figures like Ross Coulthart and Gary Nolan making waves? Is there a real shift underway, or could it be a tactic to control or redirect the narrative?

The timing remains suspicious to some, but as more official channels begin to acknowledge UAP research as a legitimate, even urgent, security and scientific matter, it may simply be the case that the cultural taboo is finally breaking.

Conclusion: The Growing Call for Openness and Scientific Rigor

If there’s one takeaway from Dr. Nolan’s appearance on Jordan Peterson’s podcast, it’s that the era of dismissing all UFO talk as fantasy or fringe is ending. The combination of academic credibility, technological innovation, and international attention is making it harder for skeptics—and governments—to ignore the mounting evidence.

For those eager to see real answers about what’s flying (or appearing) in our skies, this is a moment to push for more data, more openness, and a willingness to consider even the most unsettling possibilities. As Dr. Nolan puts it, 'Earth may well be someone else’s property.' Maybe it’s time we started paying attention, with science leading the way.

What do you think—is this the dawn of true UFO disclosure, or just another chapter in a never-ending mystery? Join the conversation below and remember: every day is a gift.

Ross Coulthart Reveals Shocking UFO Truth

Welcome back to another dose of UFO intrigue and speculation, courtesy of Vetted and your host Patrick. If you’ve been following along, you’ll know the air has been thick with rumors, revelations, and fresh confusion around one of the most talked-about incidents in modern UFO lore: the 2004 USS Nimitz "Tic Tac" encounter. Between sun-soaked breaks in Spain and behind-the-scenes documentary work, Patrick dives straight into the swirling debate— is the Tic Tac truly a Lockheed Martin marvel, or is it something even stranger, linked to non-human intelligence and mind-bending technology?

The Tic Tac Tug-of-War: Technology, Origins, and Operation

Let’s rewind for context. The saga picked up steam when investigative journalist Ross Coulthart boldly claimed—categorically, then reasonably—that the infamous Tic Tac isn’t quite what we thought. Coulthart suggests not only that Lockheed Martin was behind the Tic Tac UAP’s 2004 appearance, but that it may have been operated psionically: controlled by the human mind, possibly tapping into technology retrieved from non-human intelligence (NHI).

But as the conversation unfolds, we tumble into a rabbit hole of ambiguity. Is the Tic Tac a purely human creation, a reverse-engineered alien artifact, or a hybrid somewhere in between? Even Ross himself seems to vacillate, leaning on multiple anonymous sources but hedging those explosive claims with refreshing honesty: “I could be wrong.” Patrick channels the collective head-scratching, asking—how can one mysterious craft belong to Lockheed, yet also be a piece of alien tech controlled by the power of human brains?

Human vs. Non-Human: Who’s Flying the Tic Tac?

Ross draws a line: not all Tic Tacs are alike. According to his sources, some are products of cutting-edge aerospace companies like Lockheed Martin, while others are alleged to be the handiwork of non-human intelligences. The 2004 Tic Tac, Ross argues, might have been a Lockheed-operated test—perhaps using a recovered craft, perhaps something they built themselves. And the operation method? Psionics, or the use of mental discipline to control advanced craft, which is as sci-fi as it sounds.

This stew of speculation raises another question: if Lockheed Martin was running a secret op with such extraordinary technology, why weren’t the Navy pilots in the know? Patrick, echoing the confusion of Commander David Fraver (the very pilot who encountered the Tic Tac), calls out the compartmentalization of military secrets—where even those on the frontline aren’t told everything. As Ross puts it, “compartmentalization works.” Still, it begs the question: how do outside journalists get these inside scoops, and how do we discern truth from rumor when everyone’s operating in shadowy circles?

The Public’s Response: Unraveling a Viral Enigma

Pat’s video returns again and again to a key theme—confusion, even among experts. As the debate rages, commenters and keen-eyed viewers demand clarity. Is Lockheed just the keeper of an object they found, or are they its creators? What does it mean if a craft can be controlled psionically by a human operator? Can recovered alien craft really be repurposed and flown by corporations, or is that just another layer of speculation?

Complicating matters, former Naval aviator Commander David Fraver has flatly denied the idea that Lockheed Martin built or operated the Tic Tac he and his team encountered in 2004. His reasoning? If such a program existed, it would have been so compartmentalized, even those with top secret clearance—like himself—would never be briefed. Ross agrees, suggesting secrecy in the military-industrial complex runs so deep that even the best pilots would be kept in the dark. But once again—a big question mark hovers over who knows what, and who can actually be trusted.

What’s Really at Stake? Technology, Secrecy, and the Human Drive to Know

As Patrick points out, there are more questions than answers. Was the Tic Tac a test against the Navy’s best, designed to see how militaries would respond to radical new tech? Or is this tale part of a broader effort to throw the public off the scent, muddying the waters with stories that are impossible to fact-check? And if psionics—mind-over-matter tech—is real, even at the experimental stage, what does that mean for humanity’s understanding of consciousness and machine?

The conversation reflects something vital about the UFO/UAP debate: it’s a hall of mirrors where transparency is elusive, sources are anonymous, and official silence reigns. Yet it’s precisely these unsolved puzzles and passionate disagreements that keep us coming back for more. Is the truth out there—or just more questions?

Takeaway: Curiosity, Conversation, and Seeking the Truth

Patrick wraps up with candor and a personal touch. He doesn’t pretend to have all the answers, but he’s here to keep the conversation going—a reminder that amid uncertainty, thoughtful discussion and a healthy dose of skepticism are our best guides. Whether you’re a die-hard UFOlogist or just a curious viewer, these mysteries invite us to think bigger, question harder, and ask not just what’s flying in our skies, but who (or what) is really pulling the strings.

So, if you found your mind spinning with possibilities, drop your thoughts in the comments. Subscribe for more deep dives, and remember: every day is a gift. Until next time, keep your eyes on the skies—and your mind open to the mysteries that still await.

Ross Coulthart Drops UFO Bombshell

If you’ve followed the world of UFOs, you know that few incidents have rocked the community quite like the 2004 Nimitz encounter—the infamous "Tic Tac" UFO. With eye-witness accounts from decorated Navy pilots and serious discussions even in Congress, it’s no wonder the mystery has sparked endless speculation. But now, Australian investigative journalist Ross Coulthart has dropped a bombshell: he claims, categorically, that the Tic Tac isn’t extraterrestrial at all—it’s Lockheed Martin technology. If that’s true, why are we being led to think otherwise? Let’s dive deep into the twists, contradictions, and the wider implications of this stunning claim.

The Unfolding Tic Tac Mystery

In November 2004, seasoned Navy pilots like Commander David Fraver and Lieutenant Commander Alex Dietrich bore witness to a craft off the coast of Southern California that defied all known physics. Their vivid descriptions—a white, oblong shape the size of a fighter jet, no visible propulsion or flight surfaces, executing maneuvers no known aircraft could replicate—sent shockwaves even through skeptics. Multiple eyewitnesses, radar confirmation, and declassified footage led many to believe this was the smoking gun for extraterrestrial visitation.

But even among experts and insiders, interpretations have varied. Dietrich herself, when pressed, refrained from wild conclusions, insisting she’d leave judgment to qualified analysts. Fraver, too, sustained the mystery, stating that what they saw was beyond anything known to current material science. That ambiguity—combined with the craft's seemingly impossible movements—fueled the belief that the truth was far stranger than mere advanced aerospace technology.

Ross Coulthart’s Explosive Revelation

Enter Ross Coulthart, a journalist who’s built a reputation on dogged investigation. In a now-viral interview, Coulthart bluntly states, "I now know categorically that the tic tac is Lockheed Martin technology. Categorically." He suggests this isn’t some slip of the tongue or idle speculation—it’s based on trusted sources deeply embedded in defense circles. So, if it wasn’t aliens, but the result of some secretive American black project, why all the cover-up?

Coulthart hypothesizes that the secrecy isn’t about protecting the technology itself, but rather protecting pride and geopolitical position. The US defense apparatus, after spending trillions, might be embarrassed to admit it lags behind foreign adversaries—particularly China—in some crucial technological domains. Revealing how far behind they are could be far more dangerous to national security than any one piece of hardware falling into enemy hands. Moreover, Coulthart claims that a large part of this cutting-edge work has been kept in the shadows by private sector contractors like Lockheed Martin, eluding even the knowledge of those within the Department of Defense itself.

Manmade Marvels or Misdirection?

Coulthart’s assertion isn’t standing alone. Dr. Steven Greer, another high-profile figure in the UFO discourse, has independently said that the Tic Tac craft is yet another feather in the cap of Lockheed’s Skunk Works—a division famous for pushing the boundaries of aviation secrecy. According to Greer, even Fraver has since acknowledged the human origin of the Tic Tac, despite his earlier claims to the contrary.

Elected officials are beginning to voice similar suspicions. Representative Eric Berles reports that two separate sources have told him the Tic Tac is a Lockheed Martin creation, pointing to a progression of prototypes and a new type of propulsion technology. This tech, Berles suggests, has matured through multiple iterations, and may now be integrated into more familiar military platforms. It’s a tantalizing claim that blurs the line between science fiction and covert military R&D.

But the story takes another twist: Jeremy Corbell, documentary filmmaker and well-known UFO commentator, recounts that the CIA actively tried to shape the UFO narrative by convincing key witnesses, like Fraver, that what they chased that day was homegrown technology. Corbell warns that so-called “passage material”—disinformation intended to mislead both the public and perhaps even insiders—is actively circulating. In other words, there may be people with a vested interest in either planting the idea that extraterrestrial technology is among us, or the opposite: that everything extraordinary is just the work of well-funded defense contractors.

Truth, Information Warfare, and Public Trust

What are we to believe? Are we witnessing a truth so extraordinary it must be hidden at all costs—or is this just a modern-day reshuffling of Cold War era cloak-and-dagger, with government agencies and private companies each protecting their slice of the pie?

Coulthart and others believe the secrecy serves a strategic purpose. If revealed, the existence of technology as advanced as the Tic Tac could reshape global security and diplomatic balances, especially if the U.S. is not quite the leader it appears to be. At the same time, this secrecy raises questions about oversight: Who decides what the public and even Congress gets to know? Should even the most sensitive technological breakthroughs remain in the hands of private contractors, unaccountable to the public or legislators who fund these initiatives through taxpayer dollars?

On the other side, the presence of active disinformation campaigns further muddies the water. As Corbell notes, we’re living in an information warfare era. The challenge for all of us—investigators, lawmakers, and average citizens alike—is to separate fact from fiction, not just to satisfy our curiosity, but to safeguard transparency and trust in both government and the broader social contract.

The Ultimate Takeaway: The Human Factor in UFO Mysteries

No matter where you stand on the alien vs. human technology debate, the Tic Tac incident reveals how complex the search for truth can be. We’re confronted not just with technical mysteries, but with layers of secrecy, pride, misdirection, and genuine marvel at what humanity may have already achieved—perhaps well away from public scrutiny.

So, what’s more unsettling: the idea that we encountered alien visitors, or that humanity has quietly developed technology so advanced it outpaces our own comprehension, all while keeping it locked away? The debate is far from settled. Every new revelation demands that we remain critical, curious, and above all, vigilant about the sources and motivations behind the narratives we’re offered.

As the UFO discourse continues to evolve, the Tic Tac will remain a litmus test—not just for what we believe about the universe, but about our own society, its priorities, and its willingness to confront uncomfortable truths. What do you think? Human ingenuity or something otherworldly? The answer may reveal more about us than about what’s flying in our skies.

And by the way, if you’re following Patrick from Vetted and craving more on the subject, stay tuned for more deep dives—even if a quick Spanish vacation means fewer uploads for a week. Remember: Every day is a gift, and every mystery is an opportunity to look closer, ask harder questions, and never stop searching for the truth.

New Details Revealed About UFO Cold Case

If you think modern government cover-ups make for a wild ride, wait until you hear the story of Paul Benowitz—a man whose curiosity about strange lights in the sky became a cautionary tale of government disinformation, obsession, and the blurred boundary between fact and fiction. Get ready for a gripping journey into one of the most bizarre chapters in UFO lore, one that’s as much about human vulnerability as it is about official secrets.

Unraveling the Paul Benowitz Saga

Paul Benowitz was just a regular man living next to the Kirtland Air Force Base in New Mexico. One night, he noticed colored lights dancing in the sky—a sight that would spiral his life down an unimaginable path. At first, Benowitz thought he was simply witnessing experimental aircraft. But soon, his radios began picking up curious signals, hinting at something even stranger: what he believed was an alien language. Driven by equal parts courage and concern, Benowitz reported his findings to the Air Force, convinced that he’d stumbled onto a vital mystery.

Instead of dismissing him outright, the Air Force privately encouraged Benowitz, even funding some of his research. But while that may sound supportive, beneath the surface, a much more sinister game was at play. Behind closed doors, intelligence operatives saw an opportunity, not just to manage Benowitz’s curiosity, but to use it—and him—for their own shadowy objectives.

Disinformation and Deception: The Making of a UFO Myth

This is where the story takes on a mind-bending twist. As revealed in interviews with key figures like author Greg Bishop ("Project Beta") and counterintelligence officer Richard Doty, the Air Force orchestrated a calculated campaign of disinformation. Rather than helping Benowitz find answers, agents actively fed him false leads, staged fake evidence, and confirmed his wildest suspicions. Government insiders, like Bill Moore, even went public years later, confessing to their role in disseminating fake stories about UFOs—not just to Benowitz, but across the entire UFO community. It was an effort designed to muddy the waters, ensuring that genuine research was lost in a sea of outlandish tales and discrediting those who took the subject seriously.

For Benowitz, the consequences were devastating. Isolated, obsessed, and overwhelmed by the flood of (false) information, he ultimately suffered a mental breakdown and was institutionalized. The government’s game of smoke and mirrors had taken a grievous human toll.

Counterintelligence and the UFO Toolset

Why go to such lengths? As it turns out, UFOs are a Swiss Army knife for the intelligence world. The manufactured stories about alien visitors served multiple purposes: they provided convenient explanations for secret technologies, misled potential adversaries, and allowed counterintelligence agencies to test how information would spread among the public. As Doty himself explained, mundane military projects could be masked by UFO tales, while at the same time, UFOs became convenient scapegoats for anything truly unexplainable.

The sophisticated misinformation operation didn’t stop with Benowitz. The Air Force, through networks of contacts and informants, made sure the UFO mythos was tangled so tightly that actual truths about unexplained phenomena became indistinguishable from deliberate fiction. This campaign reached journalists, researchers, and tabloids alike, ensuring that the UFO debate would be forever shrouded in uncertainty.

The Collateral Damage of Government Games

The impact was immense—not only on Paul Benowitz, but on the credibility of the entire UFO research field. Once-trustworthy sources became unreliable, and outlandish theories drowned out serious inquiry. Mainstream scientists, politicians, and reporters shied away from the subject for fear of being labeled cranks or conspiracy nuts. In this environment, the only public voices left were fringe enthusiasts, just as the intelligence agencies intended.

Even decades later, echoes of these operations can be traced in modern revelations. Recent reports, such as a Wall Street Journal exposé about the so-called "Yankee Blue" program (purportedly a fake anti-gravity craft used as a test for new officers) show that the line between truth and fiction in the world of secrecy is as blurred as ever. The overlap—and differences—between projects like Yankee Black (which Doty claims to have worked on) and Yankee Blue only deepen the mystery and suspicion surrounding such programs.

A Cautionary Tale for the Age of Information

The Paul Benowitz episode isn’t just a tale for UFO buffs. It’s a reminder of just how easily truth can be obscured when powerful institutions choose to manipulate the narrative. Disinformation thrives when it stays close to the truth—just enough reality to entice, but enough fiction to discredit and control. And in the process, real people, like Benowitz, can get lost in the crossfire.

While the UFO cover-up narrative has fueled popular documentaries and podcasts, the lessons go far beyond the world of tinfoil hats and mysterious lights. In an era where information (and misinformation) spreads at lightning speed, Benowitz’s story challenges us to question what we know, how we know it, and who benefits from a world where fact and rumor so easily intermingle.

Conclusion: What Can We Learn?

Paul Benowitz’s tragic odyssey stands as both a warning and a call for vigilance. Whether you’re fascinated by UFOs or simply wary of government secrets, his experience underscores the critical importance of skepticism, independent verification, and compassion for those swept up by forces beyond their control. As more revelations keep bubbling to the surface, the real question may not be "Are UFOs real?" but "How do we ensure our search for truth isn’t hijacked by those who would rather we stayed lost?" Stay curious, ask questions, and remember: in the search for the unknown, sometimes the biggest mysteries are the games people play.

Ex-CIA Officer Jim Semivan's Shocking Comments From New Interview

What's going on in the world of UFOs and extraterrestrial encounters? If you’ve been following the latest discussions—especially the comments from ex-CIA agent Jim Semivan—there’s one hot question at the center: Are aliens truly a threat to humanity? It’s a topic that’s as fascinating as it is controversial, and today we’re going to dive into the nuances to help you form your own opinion.

Unraveling the Mystery Guest

The conversation started with an update on a mysterious individual who claimed to communicate with angels and aliens—a claim that sounded wild enough to make even seasoned investigators do a double take. Despite initial speculation, it's now confirmed that Dr. JJ Hurtak, a familiar figure in UFO circles, is not this enigmatic person. The real identity remains unknown, fueling online debates and keeping the community on edge. This suspense perfectly sets the stage for the day’s bigger question: should we actually be afraid of extraterrestrials?

Are Aliens Out There to Harm Us?

Jim Semivan, someone with years of insider experience, recently sparked some serious discussion by saying he doesn’t believe aliens are an existential threat to humanity. His reasoning? He acknowledges the reality of abductions and even calls them “human rights violations,” but balances this with the fact that, as far as we know, outright attacks haven't occurred and nobody’s been killed. According to Semivan, “they have done that to a certain extent…and human rights violations, but it’s not been on a scale—we haven’t killed anybody.” It’s an unsettling argument that seems to downplay the trauma experienced by alleged abductees. But is Semivan sugarcoating a real risk, or is he offering an accurate portrayal?

Imagine, for a moment, your peaceful neighborhood—white picket fence, friendly faces, classic small-town comfort. Suddenly, overnight, half the population vanishes without a trace, snatched by unknown entities. Wouldn’t you immediately see those responsible as a threat? For many, the very idea of being taken against your will is the definition of a high-level threat, regardless of whether physical harm is inflicted.

A Pattern of Deceit and Indifference

Semivan’s take introduces another chilling point: alleged alien interactions are characterized by “trickery and deceit.” According to his analysis, the messages delivered to contactees—the individuals claiming direct communication with beings—are often false, peppered with empty apocalyptic warnings and failed predictions. This pattern raises questions about the motives behind such encounters. Is the indifference or ambiguity itself a kind of threat—a manipulation of what we perceive as reality? And how much can we truly trust any messages, prophecies, or reassurances coming from unknown intelligence?

The Danger of What We Don’t Know

Here’s the kicker: no matter what seasoned experts claim, nobody really knows what aliens want or what they’re truly capable of. That uncertainty, according to the Vetted team, is reason enough to treat any extraterrestrial presence as a serious concern until proven otherwise. If even a fraction of the abduction reports are accurate, the precedent is set for treating these entities as potentially dangerous. After all, wouldn’t we treat any unknown force that invades homes, abducts people, and tampers with memories or biology as a threat? The unknown is frightening not just for what it could do, but for what we simply can’t predict.

The Disclosure Dilemma

With so many variables in play—false prophecies, possible abductions, conflicting testimonies—the push for government disclosure is more crucial than ever. Yet, Semivan and others caution against quick judgments and public statements made without solid evidence. Misunderstanding or misrepresenting these experiences could sow confusion, fear, or even panic. So, before anyone declares “aliens are friendly” or “aliens are our enemies,” it’s essential to gather clear data and, at the very least, acknowledge just how much we don’t know.

Let’s Talk About Threat Assessment

So, what’s the bottom line? For many, the actions alleged—abductions, experiments, and psychological manipulation—constitute a very real threat, no matter how you slice it. Even if physical harm is rare or nonexistent, the act of forcibly taking someone is enough cause for concern. And until we have more answers, it makes perfect sense to treat the unknown as risky by default, rather than brushing off fears as paranoia.

Final Thoughts: Why the Conversation Matters

The debate about whether aliens are a threat isn’t just an academic one for UFO enthusiasts. It’s a question about how we, as a society, deal with profound uncertainty. Should we stay skeptical, demand better evidence, and acknowledge the trauma of alleged abductees? Or should we take comfort in the lack of direct aggression, as some experts suggest? The truth is probably somewhere in between, but what’s clear is that open dialogue, critical thinking, and compassion are essential.

As we wait for answers that might never come, keep questioning, keep sharing, and keep an open mind—because, as the Vetted says, "every day is a gift." Peace out.

New UFO Mystery Man Emerges

If you thought congressional committee meetings were only about policy debates and boring budgets, you haven’t heard the latest on Capitol Hill’s dive into the UFO—now officially UAP (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena)—mystery. A recent hiring decision made by a congressman has sent ripples through the world of UFO enthusiasts and skeptics alike, tying together intelligence expertise, mystical predictions, and claims of conversations with entities not of this Earth. Buckle up, because this is one wild ride that’s as much about the human search for answers as it is about government secrets.

The Mystery Begins: Why David Grusch Joined the Team

A few months back, headlines crackled with the news that Congressman Eric Burlison brought on David Grusch to advise him on UAP matters. Why stir the pot? As explained by Burlison himself, the UAP topic kept hitting a brick wall in Congress. Despite growing public curiosity and classified discussions behind closed doors, no real progress seemed to ever materialize. What was missing, Burlison realized, was an expert who could help government officials even know which questions to ask in the first place. Grusch, a seasoned intelligence officer turned whistleblower, was appointed to help decipher the tangled web of UAP reports and connect the dots inside the shadowy intelligence community.

But Grusch’s consulting wasn’t limited to regular UFO files. He soon introduced Burlison to someone whose story sounded almost too extraordinary to be true—a person claiming direct communication with what he described as “aliens,” a journey that pulled together threads of faith, science, and otherworldly experience.

A Conversation That Shocked Capitol Hill

On a now-famous X (formerly Twitter) Space, Eric Burlison opened up about a mind-blowing conversation he had with this mysterious figure. Though careful not to name names at first, Burlison shared that this individual had a background as a Jew, then became an atheist, and later a Christian—all catalyzed by apparently talking with extraterrestrials (who, in turn, talked back). According to Burlison, while under what he considered alien or angelic influence, this man would channel messages, his wife transcribing the predictions which, remarkably, often came true. Among those messages: affirmation of Jesus’s existence, his miracles, and a role as the Messiah, endorsed not by theologians, but by beings from beyond.

Predictably, this made waves—not just because of the outlandish nature of alien conversation claims, but due to its impact on the UAP investigation in Congress. Why would a hired government advisor facilitate meetings with someone like this? What value could fantastical, spiritual narratives possibly have in a taxpayer-funded search for truth about UAPs?

Who Is the Mystery Alien Communicator?

Curiosity exploded online as listeners of the X Space did their homework. One determined sleuth (known as Astral) connected the dots—a profile matching almost perfectly with Dr. JJ Hurtak, a renowned mystic, scholar of Jewish and Christian traditions, and author of “The Book of Knowledge: The Keys of Enoch.” Hurtak’s credentials are impressive; he’s a veteran investigator of extraterrestrial claims and president of the Academy for Future Science. He’s known for discussing firsthand contact experiences and emphasizes a vision of ascension—a kind of global spiritual evolution rather than a descent into chaos.

While there's no definitive public evidence that Hurtak’s wife transcribes messages from alleged extraterrestrial sources, other elements—the faith journey, the predictions, and the message about Jesus—line up closely with Burlison’s description. Some pointed to Dan Burisch as another possible candidate, but the circumstantial evidence leaned overwhelmingly towards Hurtak.

What Does This Mean for America’s UAP Effort?

The immediate question on the minds of both citizens and skeptics is: What is the point of involving someone like Dr. Hurtak in an official government UAP investigation? Is Congress now seeking answers in mystical traditions and psychic experiences as much as in defense agency data? Does Grusch see value in connecting spiritual experiences—and, by extension, humanity’s deeper questions of existence—with day-to-day government investigation?

It’s important to remember that throughout history, paradigm-shifting discoveries have often collided with disbelief and ridicule before eventually making their way into the mainstream. That said, taxpayer dollars funding consultations with people who claim direct alien contact is bound to raise eyebrows—and questions of accountability.

Burlison himself acknowledges the skepticism, suggesting that even in religious circles, claiming God “talks back” can make you stick out. Yet, the willingness of policymakers to explore every avenue (however unconventional) might be indicative of just how mysterious—and perhaps unsolvable—the UAP tangle really is.

Faith, Ancient Civilizations, and UAP: Drawing Big Connections

Besides the present-day intrigue, the conversation also touched on ancient mysteries: giant megalithic sites worldwide, from Machu Picchu to the pyramids of Egypt and Mexico, featuring stonework of such technical perfection that some believe even today’s machines would struggle to replicate it. Such sites—according to thinkers like Tim Alberino and echoed by Burlison—hint at long-lost advanced civilizations, possibly with help or inspiration from non-human intelligence or at least otherworldly knowledge that was later lost to cataclysm.

Perhaps it’s this intersection—faith, history, science, and the search for truth—that’s so compelling to those inside and outside Capitol Hill. As humanity contemplates its own origins and destiny, blending the empirical with the mystical might not be so strange after all. After all, some of history’s greatest revelations began not with what we know, but with what we’re willing to question.

The Takeaway: A New Era of Openness, or Simply More Mystery?

At the end of the day, we may never get full disclosure about who exactly is behind these extraordinary claims, what their relationship truly is to official investigations, and where the truth really lies between faith, folklore, and the field reports sitting in locked government file cabinets. Still, what’s undeniable is the expanding scope of America’s curiosity—on Capitol Hill and beyond—about UFOs, consciousness, advanced ancient civilizations, and life’s biggest mysteries.

As the conversation unfolds, the call to citizens is clear: Stay engaged, keep pressing for answers, and remember to bring a healthy dose of skepticism and open-mindedness to the table. Today’s wild claims are tomorrow’s paradigm shifts—or, at the very least, a reminder of just how strange, fascinating, and interconnected our search for truth really is.

What do you think: Should Congress consult with those who claim direct alien communication, or is it a leap too far from hard data? Drop your thoughts below—after all, in a world of mysteries, everyone’s perspective matters.

If you enjoyed this journey through Capitol Hill’s UAP saga, be sure to subscribe for new updates each week. And remember—every day is a gift!

Mick West Gives His Take on 'Mosul' UFO Video

If you’ve spent any time in UFO communities or watched the recent buzz about the so-called "Mosul orb," you’ll know how a mysterious video can spark fierce debate, wild theories, and legitimate curiosity. But what if the answer to one of the internet’s newest "UFO mysteries" is actually simpler—and more down-to-earth—than many imagine? Let’s dive into what really happened over Mosul, Iraq, and why the likeliest explanation is less "X-Files" and more "weather forecast."

A Mysterious Video and a Scientific Approach

The story begins with a brief, blurry video showing a silvery sphere zipping across the sky near Mosul, Iraq, just north of Baghdad. The footage, filmed from a military aircraft with on-screen data mostly redacted, quickly made the rounds online. Many were quick to label the orb as a UFO, but skeptics and analysts stepped in for a closer look—with some surprisingly accessible tools.

By examining both the initial still photo (which retained some location data) and the video, analysts triangulated the event’s exact geography. The coordinates, distance to the object (26,000 feet), date, and time were decodable, and even the altitude of the plane could be deduced. Next, by feeding all this data into 3D modeling software, some interesting facts came to light. Specifically, if you place a sphere at the determined coordinates under that lighting, it matches the highlight—the way light reflects off the orb—almost perfectly. This isn’t just proof that the video is genuine. It also supports the idea that the object really was spherical and really was floating at that time and place.

The Science of Parallax—and the Case for a Balloon

Here’s where it gets fascinating. When the analysts simulated the movement with accurate sight lines and field of view from the plane, they realized something: If you stick a stationary sphere in that position, the parallax from a moving aircraft makes the orb appear to dart wildly across the screen. In other words, a featureless sphere simply drifting along could look much faster and stranger simply because of how the plane and camera move relative to it.

To go further, they calculated possible speeds and directions using the video’s data. A solution appeared that matched reality: a sphere drifting southeast at about 10 miles per hour. When historic weather data was checked, it showed wind at 10 miles per hour in—wait for it—exactly the same direction. The best hypothesis? The mysterious orb was likely a large weather balloon or radar target, simply gliding along with the wind.

Balloons: The Bane of UFO Enthusiasts

If you’re thinking, “Well, that’s kind of boring. Isn’t it possible it was something else?” you’re not alone. Every time a UAP (unidentified anomalous phenomena) video is released, the internet fills with speculation: alien ships, advanced drones, secret military tech. But the much less glamorous truth is, the vast majority of such cases are easily explained.

In fact, the United States government’s own UAP task force (now the "AARO") has resolved scores of other "unknown object" cases as balloons. It turns out, balloons—in all their forms, from party decorations to giant scientific instruments—are common in our skies. They drift, float, and reflect sunlight, often looking weird and mysterious, especially through grainy military cameras.

The analysis also points out an important aspect of perception: most pilots and military analysts were not, until recently, specifically trained to recognize how balloons and other mundane objects appear on advanced cameras. As software tools and experience grow, many cases are identified more quickly. Interestingly, up to 80% of resolved UAP cases turn out to be balloons, 10% birds, and others are regular objects or natural phenomena. That doesn’t mean there aren’t truly weird or as-yet-unexplained cases out there; it just means that the bar for "alien spaceship" is incredibly high.

Why the Balloon Beat Occam’s Razor

One of the scientific concepts often invoked in these discussions is "Occam’s razor": the idea that the simplest explanation which fits all the facts is usually the correct one. In the case of the Mosul orb, the fact that it matches the size, speed, direction, and appearance of a weather balloon—at a time and place where wind supports the hypothesis—makes the balloon theory overwhelmingly likely.

Could it have been something else? In theory, yes. It could even have been, for example, a ten-foot metallic sphere moving at 100 miles an hour—something fantastical or technologically unprecedented. But then you have to ask: wouldn’t a massive metal object flying low over a city have been seen by many others? Wouldn’t we have radar evidence or eyewitness reports? And why is the simplest explanation—supported by all available data—not good enough for some?

Debunking Puddle Theories and Unlikely Hypotheses

Interestingly, the Mosul orb’s appearance led to online theories ranging from reflections in distant puddles to debris stuck on the camera lens. Analysts debunked these by showing that the sun’s position and shadows could not have created such a reflection, and an object on the lens would be out of focus. As with many UFO debates, plausible-sounding but physically impossible explanations proliferate—until they’re calmly and systematically ruled out.

The Importance of Open Tools and Community Analysis

What makes cases like the Mosul orb even more intriguing is that the tools and data are available for the public to use. One researcher even put their 3D modeling software online, so anyone can test different object sizes, speeds, and flight paths themselves. Unlike shadowy "expert panels" or secret military studies, this transparent approach allows enthusiasts and skeptics alike to see just how many possibilities exist—and weigh the odds for themselves.

The core lesson? Balloons fit all the facts and don’t require new, unproven or wildly speculative hypotheses. The alien spaceship theory is “possible” in the strictest sense, but when you’re dealing with trillions of balloons and zero confirmed alien spacecraft, the math becomes pretty lopsided.

Aliens: Out There, But Probably Not in Mosul

Does this mean UFOs are never real, or that aliens don’t exist? Not at all! Both analysts in the conversation end by expressing real hope and belief that life almost certainly exists somewhere else in our universe. Given its staggering size and age, it's only a matter of time and luck before we receive more definitive proof. But for now, the search continues—and most orb-like UFOs likely remain just ordinary balloons caught at extraordinary moments.

Takeaway: It’s OK to Dream—But Start With the Facts

The next time you see a grainy UFO video or see people on social media getting hyped about another "unexplained phenomenon," remember the Mosul orb. It's a perfect reminder that science, common sense, and a little detective work can go a long way. Staying curious is great, but as Carl Sagan said, "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence." Until then, keep your feet on the ground—even as you scan the skies.

New Bombshell UFO Video Released

Have you ever wondered if the truth about UFOs is really out there? Well, buckle up, because a brand-new piece of military UFO footage—nicknamed the “Mosul Orb”—has just been released, thanks to relentless investigative efforts and a hard-won battle for government transparency. In this post, we’ll break down what makes this video historic, why it matters, and what it can teach us about both UFOs and the pursuit of truth.

A New Chapter in UFO Disclosure

When it comes to sightings of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAPs), there’s a lot of noise, speculation, and skepticism. But the release of the Mosul Orb video marks a pivotal moment. For the first time ever, the public gets a look at what the U.S. military filmed in the heat of an active combat zone, not just a blurry photo or secondhand account but a bona fide, unedited video. This kind of raw, unfiltered evidence is rare, largely because getting it out in the open requires navigating a maze of government secrecy.

Journalists Patrick from Vetted, Jeremy Corbell, and George Knapp—well-known figures in the UFO community—have worked tirelessly to bring attention to footage like this. But the real hero of this story is Dustin Slaughter from the UAP Register. Through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit, Dustin managed to pry the video from the grip of the National Air and Space Intelligence Center, overcoming years of red tape, denial, and legal wrangling.

Why Does the Mosul Orb Matter?

Simply put: it changes the game. Up until now, people interested in UAPs have had to rely on a patchwork of rumors, partial disclosures, or still images. The Mosul Orb video jumps that hurdle by showing an actual moving object, captured in full-color, cruising over Mosul, Iraq during active military operations on April 16th, 2016. The Pentagon and related agencies had previously kept the footage under wraps, only releasing a single still image that generated plenty of debate—and no shortage of wild theories.

Seeing is Believing: The Video Breakdown

So, what does the video show? From first glance, it appears to be a shiny silver sphere zipping across the sky. For years, debunkers argued it might be anything from a raindrop on the lens to a trick of light or even a common object like a pothole reflecting sunlight. But with the full motion video available, those claims don’t really hold water. The footage clearly shows the sphere moving in a manner that’s inconsistent with raindrops, birds, drones, or anything else that’s easy to explain away.

What really fuels the curiosity is that the U.S. government, with all its high-tech resources, still could not figure out what the Mosul Orb is. They didn’t classify it as a balloon or ordinary aircraft. Instead, they simply labeled it as “anomalous”—the official term for UFOs. For the doubters and debunkers, this footage offers them exactly what they asked for: a clear-cut clip, not just a single frame. Still, the mystery deepens. If the experts can’t explain it, what are the rest of us supposed to think?

The Real Importance: Persistence and Transparency

Perhaps the most remarkable takeaway from this episode isn’t what flies in the Mosul Orb video—but how the video came to light. Dustin Slaughter’s determination to file not just FOIA requests, but actually sue for public access, highlights how real progress in government transparency often takes years of patience and a willingness to fight for the truth. His work stands as proof that independent journalism matters, even when it’s not glamorous, flashy, or immediately celebrated.

And if you think this is the end of the story, think again. Dustin and the UAP Register have other cases in the pipeline, which could surface more videos in the near future. Each new release adds another building block in the quest to understand the UFO phenomenon.

What Happens Next?

Nobody’s claiming that one video will settle the mystery about life beyond our planet—or even explain every UAP sighting. But as Jeremy Corbell points out, “the collective weight is a preposterous preponderance of evidence.” Each new piece of credible data builds trust in those trying to shine a light on the unknown, and ultimately, chips away at the walls of secrecy and skepticism.

What should you take from this? For one, it’s a reminder to stay curious and open-minded. When a team of dedicated folks can wrangle this kind of footage from the most guarded corners of officialdom, it proves that ordinary people—with enough persistence—can help bring truth to light.

If you’re fascinated by mysteries in the sky, or just want to support independent investigative efforts, keep an eye on the teams behind these stories. And as always, draw your own conclusions—don’t just take anyone’s word for it. After all, every day is a gift, and our search for answers is only as good as the questions we’re willing to keep asking.

Stay tuned, and don’t forget to share your thoughts. What do you think the Mosul Orb could be? Could we be looking at genuine evidence of something truly extraordinary? Comment below and join the conversation!

The Funniest UFO Podcast Ever Recorded (Ft. Comedians Dan St. Germain & Sean Donnelly)

If you think the world of UFOs is all shadowy government agents, mysterious cover-ups, and serious-faced researchers, it’s time to tune into a different frequency. In a recent episode of Vetted, host Patrick welcomed standup comedians Dan St. Germain and Sean Donnelly, the duo behind the BBS Bros podcast, for what might be the funniest—and most refreshingly human—take on UFO phenomena you’ll ever hear. It may start with conspiracy theories and end with alien anatomy, but underneath the gags lies something vital: humor as a lifeline in a field overwhelmed by skepticism, fervor, and unending questions.

Let’s take a journey through the key themes and insights from this laugh-out-loud episode that reveals why sometimes, comedy is exactly what the UFO community—and maybe all of us—really needs.

The Light Side of the UFO Obsession

Vetted starts out on a note many UFO enthusiasts will find familiar: a sense of exhaustion. Patrick, candid as ever, admits he’s been feeling down, weighed by the constant churn of UFO news, intense community debates, and the high-pressure world of content creation. What turns the tide? Pure levity. Dan and Sean smash into the scene with a barrage of irreverent takes, none sacred—from tourists reenacting JFK’s assassination to the awkward dynamics of standup gigs interrupted by extraterrestrial visitors. Their only disclaimer? It’s all just jokes, and if anyone’s feelings get hurt, remember: “We definitely did a lot of roasting…but it’s all in good fun.”

Why does this matter? Because, as Patrick confesses, after mistakes and missteps, what he needed most wasn’t another serious analysis—but a “reset.” Comedy, it turns out, isn’t just a release; it’s a necessary counterweight to the endless gravity of the unknown.

Where Aliens Meet Comedy: If ET Had a Sense of Humor

One of the most delightful segments comes when Patrick asks the comedians how they’d handle it if, mid-set, an alien landed during a routine. Sean imagines trying crowd work with a confused extraterrestrial; Dan quips about the sheer chaos of such an event—“aliens landing would be the show!” They riff about whether aliens would even understand human humor, noting that in all the alleged abduction stories, rarely does a sense of humor come through. “I’ve never heard a single story where the alien was hilarious,” Dan points out.

They toy with the idea that maybe, just maybe, advanced civilizations see our impressions as pointless pretense—why do we pretend to be someone else when telepathy and pure consciousness might be the norm? Whether it’s imagining an ‘Alien Open Mic’ planet (a hellish scenario of 7 trillion open mic comics), or wondering how an alien might misinterpret slapstick, the discussion is a potent reminder: not only do we humanize aliens in our media, we also project our own hangups—about seriousness, about fun, and about what it means to truly connect.

Skepticism, Mainstream Media, and the Eternal Debate

The laughter doesn’t mean the episode shies away from real critique. The trio cracks wise about the recent Wall Street Journal article “debunking” UFOs without offering hard evidence. Patrick is quick to call out the double standard: if mainstream journalists want to take UFO believers to task over a lack of evidence, shouldn’t their own work be held to the same standard?

There’s also meta-comedy in the realization that everyone—skeptics and believers alike—often get swept up in the narrative machine. The episode pokes fun at the industry side of both media and comedy, where traditional gatekeepers are fading, replaced by the wild world of independent voices and podcasts. This fusion, Patrick argues, is helping keep the discussion alive in ways late-night TV never could, weaving skepticism, genuine curiosity, and irreverent humor together.

Finding the Humanity in the Unexplained

As the discussion pivots into legendary UFO cases, like the Roswell and Aztec incidents, the comedians highlight the strange intersection of American hustle, local mythmaking, and eternal uncertainty. Is every colorful story a hoax, a grift, or the kernel of something real? The truth is, the landscape of UFO lore is as much about the people—witnesses, hucksters, researchers, townsfolk—which makes these stories hilarious, relatable, and oddly poignant.

The team notes that whenever extraordinary claims come to light, communities inevitably take advantage, blending commerce (alien-themed motels, festivals) with the mystique. This isn’t cynicism; it’s recognition that even if every detail wasn’t true, these stories build identity, foster togetherness, and keep the questions alive for the next generation.

Humor as a Bridge: What the UFO Field Really Needs

Perhaps the biggest takeaway is just how refreshing—and necessary—it is to inject humor into a field as fraught as ufology. Patrick is effusive in his praise for Dan and Sean’s approach: blending sincere interest with the ability to laugh at the absurd. “I don’t think this community has [humor] enough,” he reflects. Their style not only normalizes curiosity about the unknown but keeps the field accessible to newcomers who might be put off by dogma, tribalism, or doom-laden theorizing.

The closing sentiment is genuine: “Anything you’re in for a while…you might get a little disenchanted. I still love comedy but this is like being immersed in our hobby.” The podcast started as a fun distraction but has blossomed into a forum—one that keeps the questions coming and the spirit alive.

Conclusion: Keep Looking Up—and Keep Laughing

In a world where it sometimes feels like everything’s a conspiracy and nobody can agree on the evidence, maybe the best tool isn’t just data—it’s our ability to laugh together. The Vetted x BBS Bros crossover is proof that the most powerful antidote to paranoia and burnout is a good-natured roast, a willingness to poke fun at ourselves, and a community that doesn’t take itself too seriously.

So whether you're a die-hard ufologist, a healthy skeptic, or someone who just loves a good joke, take a cue from this episode: keep your eyes on the skies—but don’t forget to keep your funny bone engaged along the way.

Richard Dolan Reveals SHOCKING Alien Encounter For First Time

Ever sat around a table late at night, swapping stories that flirt with the unexplained? There’s something undeniably compelling about tales that brush up against the great mysteries—especially those that hint at life beyond our dusty blue planet. These stories are more than entertainment; they urge us to question the edges of normalcy and peek behind life’s curtain. Today, we dive into one such account: a chilling, vivid encounter, brought to life on Patrick’s Vetted channel, originally told by venerable UFO researcher Richard Dolan. Buckle in, because this story is bound to leave you looking at the world with a dash more wonder.

A Mysterious Encounter in Small-Town Pennsylvania

The story starts as many uncanny tales do: in the ordinary. Richard Dolan recounts receiving a visit from a woman at his book table in Eerie, Pennsylvania—a woman, now in her 60s, eager to share a peculiar incident that had lingered in her memory for decades. She was 15 at the time, sitting in a small-town church alongside her mother. In a community so tight-knit that every congregant was a familiar face, two strangers swept into the sanctuary: a stunning blonde couple, dressed in eye-catching blue clothing, looking every bit like supermodels from another era.

Instantly, the woman's attention was drawn to them, not only because of their striking appearance and unusual attire, but because no one else seemed to notice. What’s more, an inexplicable event occurred—she heard their thoughts in her head. One of them remarked, almost telepathically, that they seemed to be fitting in, save for the girl behind who could hear them. The experience was brief and intense, the telepathic channel shut abruptly.

Beyond the church service, curiosity consumed her. She trailed the couple as they left—not towards a parking lot or car, but into a field and toward the woods. There, a third figure appeared: a tall, intimidating man in black, reminiscent of Lurch from The Addams Family. The trio vanished into the trees, leaving the amazed teenager with a story she would carry her entire life.

The Nordics, Myths, and Recurring Themes

This unsettling story is far from isolated. Within the larger tapestry of UFO and alien encounter lore, we often hear of so-called “Nordics” or “tall whites”—beings who, as the name suggests, are tall, fair-haired, and strikingly human-like. Tales of their appearances pop up not only in obscure witness accounts but even in political rumors and international news stories. Fascination for these narratives speaks to something deeply human; the urge to find patterns in chaos, to seek meaning behind what seems inexplicable.

As Patrick notes—and as Richard Dolan himself acknowledges—the validity of this particular story, like so many in the UFO community, is impossible to verify. But that misses the point. What compels us isn’t necessarily hard proof but the consistency of certain motifs and the emotions they stir. There’s a childlike thrill in considering the possibility that church pews and quiet fields might, now and then, play host to visitors from beyond.

Skepticism, Open-Mindedness, and the UFO Research Community

But it’s not all mystery and magic; there’s a strong thread of skepticism woven through. Dolan highlights an all-too-common reaction to tales like these: embarrassment. In a world fueled by facts and desperate for credibility, no UFO researcher wants to be seen as gullible. This natural defensiveness leads many to dismiss odd stories out of hand, fearing ridicule or professional damage.

Yet, as Dolan and Patrick contend, perhaps mainstream society overcompensates. The reality may be more radical, more shattering, than we’re comfortable admitting. There are mountains of documents, consistent patterns in witness testimony, and a phenomenon that stubbornly resists easy explanation. “It breaks everything,” Dolan says—the neatness of our world, our expectations, and our scientific categories. The most haunting possibility? That we’re only just scratching the surface.

Richard Dolan: Why Passion Matters in UFO Research

What sets Dolan apart, and why Patrick admires him, is not only his methodical research and lucid presentations but his warmth and humility. In a field prone to wild speculation and sensationalism, Dolan is both curious and critical, open but never reckless. Patrick’s own meeting with Dolan at a recent “Contact in the Desert” event only reinforced his respect. It’s this blend of intellectual rigor and openhearted humanity that the community sorely needs.

Stories like the Pennsylvania church encounter serve both as tantalizing clues and humbling reminders. The universe, Dolan believes, may well be home to other forms of intelligence—civilizations with established presences, operating on the fringes of everyday life. Whether you buy in or remain skeptical, you can’t deny the enduring pull of such questions.

Takeaway: The Value of Exploring the Unexplained

So, what are we to make of it? Maybe the specifics of this story will never be validated, but the point is broader. There’s enormous value in remaining curious, embracing stories that challenge our perspectives, and not being too quick to label believers as crazy. After all, much of what we take for granted today was once the stuff of legends and fireside tales.

Keep the conversations alive. If you’ve heard or experienced something strange, don’t be afraid to share it—your voice might just be the piece that helps the rest of us see the bigger picture. The unknown isn’t frightening; it’s a call to wonder. As Patrick says, every day is a gift. Use yours to keep searching, questioning, and, most of all, imagining.

David Grusch Drops UFO Bombshell (Nazca Mummies)

If you’ve been glued to the growing revelations around UFOs, government whistleblowers, and congressional investigations, the latest round of interviews and rumors will have your head spinning. The ongoing saga now includes talk of mummies in Peru, jaw-dropping briefings for the former president, and claims that alien-human hybrids might be living among us. Sound like science fiction? Welcome to the wild world of government UFO secrets in 2024.

The Whistleblowers and Congressional Curiosity

The central players in this story are once again David Grush, the Pentagon whistleblower who made waves in July 2023 by alleging a government cover-up of non-human technologies, and Congressman Eric Burlison, who’s found himself at the epicenter of some sensational claims. According to recent interviews, Grush recommended that Burlison examine the mysterious Peruvian Nazca mummies after seeing resemblances between them and what he’d been shown in classified government briefings. This wasn't just idle curiosity—Grush’s suggestion was based on “physiological similarities” between some of these ancient figures and the beings described in secret reports.

But here’s where things get stranger: while some interviews and online personalities said Grush “validated” the authenticity of the alien mummies, close listening to Rep. Burlison’s actual words shows it’s much more ambiguous. He himself is skeptical, clarifying that while Grush suggested going to see the mummies and said some look like what he’s seen described, no direct validation has been offered, and he also pointed out that many of the mummies are considered fakes. It’s a classic case of the rumors running ahead of the facts, but the intrigue is undeniable.

Presidential Briefings and Talk of Alien Hybrids

Another bombshell comes from reports that former President Donald Trump was briefed about “tall whites” and Nordic alien-human hybrids. According to Burlison, Grush revealed these details during private conversations. The claim goes as far as stating Trump had an "existential briefing" during his impeachment, which supposedly “rocked his world view.” The revelation that crossbreeds—part human, part alien—might be living among us is the kind of story that normally resides in tabloid headlines or late-night radio.

Burlison even pushed Grush for specifics, asking: “How would you know if you were a crossbreed?” The lack of a solid answer was flagged by Burlison as a huge red flag. For someone newly exposed to the edges of government secrecy, the lack of curiosity or follow-through on such a stunning statement seemed unbelievable. It raises the question: in a subject as bizarre as alien hybrids, could genuine evidence ever surface, or is the whole thing an endless parade of rumor and speculation?

Sorting Fact from Fantasy

Throughout the interviews, Burlison repeatedly positions himself as the “show me” skeptic. He admits that even after private briefings and off-the-record meetings with insiders like Grush, he’s seen no real evidence—only heard stories. “I’m from the Show Me State. I’m going to have to see it myself before I believe,” he insists. Even within congressional circles granted access to sensitive material, concrete proof of alien life remains elusive.

That honesty—mixed with the willingness to keep exploring—might be why the UFO community respects him. It’s deeply telling that despite all the sensationalist talk, not a single willing lawmaker claims to have seen the smoking gun.

Mummies, Mysteries, and the Search for Truth

The mummies in question, some purported to be of alien origin, have long been a subject of controversy. The Peruvian Nazca finds have both captivated and divided researchers worldwide, with many being dismissed as elaborate hoaxes. The possibility that some remain unexplained, and that they might match the descriptions found in clandestine government briefings, gives a new dimension to the story. But as Burlison points out, if they all appear similar, how can only some be real? It's a head-scratching contradiction that only invites further scrutiny.

Briefings, Rumors, and Philosophical Questions

In the UFO disclosure landscape, whispers of insiders introducing lawmakers to “people who talk to aliens or angels” introduces yet another surreal element. According to Burlison, David Grush facilitated a meeting with an individual who claims to have regular communication with otherworldly entities—who even cites alien affirmations that Jesus was real. These stories straddle the border of UFO lore and spiritual belief, leaving many listeners skeptical but hungry for answers.

Ancient Civilizations and Hidden Technology

Another topic that surfaced is the enduring mystery surrounding ancient megalithic sites: pyramids, stone structures at Machu Picchu, and other wonders that challenge our understanding of ancient technology. The suggestion that lost, highly advanced civilizations could have existed—potentially guided by off-world influence—adds weight to the idea that humanity’s history may hold secrets as enigmatic as the UFO phenomenon itself.

Where Does This Leave Us?

So, after all the intrigue, allegations, televised testimonies, and Twitter threads, what do we really know? Not much more than we did before. Despite multiple rounds of congressional grilling and media exposés, the line between fact and fantastical storytelling remains razor thin. As Burlison notes, “the best information has been put forward,” and even so, he’s seen no proof—only talk, speculation, and unanswered questions.

Are we on the edge of a paradigm-shifting revelation about our place in the universe? Or has the world of government UFO secrets become a hall of mirrors, filled with half-truths, rumors, and unresolved mysteries?

The Takeaway: Stay Curious, But Stay Skeptical

The ever-expanding mosaic of UFO tales—alien mummies, presidential briefings, and government whistleblowers—may thrill our imaginations, but for now, solid evidence remains just out of reach. Stay curious, keep asking questions, and demand evidence—a healthy mix of open-mindedness and skepticism is the smartest way to navigate the strange skies of UFO research. Who knows? The next big revelation might be just around the corner—and if history is any guide, it will be every bit as wild and confusing as what we've seen so far.

Until then, watch the skies—and the headlines.

I Have Big News To Share

Have you ever wondered if there are real people out there who can summon UFOs with just their minds? If so, you’re not alone – and you just might have an opportunity to get involved in a truly unique documentary. In this captivating update from Patrick at Vetted, we’re taken behind the scenes of an ambitious new filmmaking adventure and treated to the camaraderie and excitement that only the UFO community can provide.

A New Documentary on the Mysterious World of Psionics

Patrick’s big news is the launch of a documentary project all about psionics — specifically, the phenomena of people who claim they can summon orbs or UFOs with their minds. It’s a bold claim that sits at the crossroads of science, mystery, and the vast unknown. The documentary began filming at Contact in the Desert, a well-known event in the world of UFOlogy, and will continue to capture stories and demonstrations over the coming months.

But this isn’t your typical YouTube video or backyard investigation. Patrick is collaborating with a professional film company, signaling that this is a passion project with real production power. The goal is simple in concept but ambitious in scope: journey across the globe to find everyday people (not ex-military or government insiders) who say they possess this psychic ability, and put their claims to the test—on camera.

The Call for Real People With Extraordinary Claims

In sharing his journey so far, Patrick lets us in on an honest roadblock: many self-proclaimed psionics have been hard to reach, perhaps shy of the spotlight. Some have responded, but most have stayed silent, leaving the field wide open. That’s led to a unique and exciting invitation for viewers: if you, or someone you know, genuinely claims to summon orbs or UFOs with the power of thought and are willing to go on camera, Patrick wants to hear from you.

No smoke and mirrors. No anonymous testimonials hidden in the shadows. This documentary is searching for authentic people ready to share, showcase their ability, and maybe even help Patrick himself give it a try. He requests not just emails, but stories, locations, and—if available—actual video evidence of the phenomenon. What sets this project apart is its search for regular people with unusual abilities, stepping forward without the typical trappings of podcasts, government connections, or military backgrounds.

How to Get Involved: Sharing Your Psionic Story

Participating couldn’t be easier. If you have—or believe you have—the ability to summon UFOs with your mind, Patrick invites you to send an email to psionicsfilm@gmail.com. Provide some background about yourself, describe your abilities, and preferably share videos of your experiences. The key requirement is transparency: you must be willing to appear on camera, share your real name, and demonstrate your abilities publicly.

This is a chance for those who feel isolated or overlooked in the mainstream conversation to stand up and be counted. It’s also a unique opportunity to become part of (potentially) groundbreaking research on the fascinating edge of human consciousness and unexplained phenomena.

Community, Collaboration, and Supporting Fellow Creators

Amid the heady talk of psionics and mystery, Patrick shares a lighter moment—an unboxing of impressive merch from Chris Ramsey’s Area 52. With genuine enthusiasm, he showcases thoughtful gifts: shirts, hats, notebooks, and unique items all branded with the mystique of Area 52 and “Majestic 12.” The segment is a testament to the collaboration and mutual support found among content creators in the UFO and mystery community.

Patrick’s excitement is infectious, from appreciating the quality and design of the gear to expressing gratitude for the support and connections within this creative family. It’s a reminder that, beyond the big questions, the adventure is just as much about the friendships forged along the way. Shout-outs, links, and encouragement to support Area 52’s merch are woven throughout, underlining the strong sense of camaraderie in the community.

Why This Documentary Matters

There’s something compelling about the quest to document psionics. Whether skeptical or convinced, most people are drawn to stories at the edge of the known, where open-minded exploration can yield surprises—or at least open up new avenues of thought. Patrick’s project isn’t seeking sensationalism; it’s calling for sincerity, testing the unusual claims of ordinary people, and giving the phenomena a genuine platform.

For those interested in mysteries, consciousness, and the limits of human potential, this documentary has the makings of a must-see. It’s an inclusive invitation to those who believe they possess unexplained abilities and to curious viewers ready to witness whatever unfolds.

Share Your Story: The Search Is On!

Patrick’s final message is simple but resonant: if you’re ready to step into the light, to share and demonstrate your unique abilities, reach out and become part of something special. The only rule is honesty and openness—you must be comfortable on camera, willing to be seen.

Just as importantly, Patrick wraps up with warmth and gratitude, emphasizing the gift of community and encouraging everyone to cherish each day and each connection. Whether you’re sending in your psionic story or simply supporting a favorite creator, you’re a vital part of the journey.

Don’t forget: real people, real abilities, real stories—email psionicsfilm@gmail.com to help unlock the mysteries of the mind, the skies, and everything in between. And if you want some killer Area 52 merch to go along with your curiosity, check out the links and support a fellow creative explorer. Every day is a gift—so why not make it extraordinary?

Danny Sheehan Drops UFO Bombshell

If you’ve spent any time in the world of UFO podcasts, you've probably felt the tug-of-war between amusement, skepticism, and the chilling thought—what if some of these wild claims are true? Recently, Danny Sheehan, a seasoned voice in the UFO disclosure community, dropped what host Patrick from Vetted calls a total bombshell. With war metaphors, secret government actions, and shimmering undertones of conspiracy, Sheehan claims that high-level humans are, as we speak, engaging in secret hostilities with non-human intelligences—aliens, to be direct—in ways the public can’t see, protest, or even confirm. Let’s break down the big ideas from the video, explore what it means for us as curious citizens, and ask how laughter, skepticism, and activism all have roles in a world that might just be stranger than fiction.

The Comedy and Seriousness of the UFO Conversation

Before diving into the revelations, Patrick set the stage by highlighting the value of humor in a world obsessed with the unknown. Appearing on the BBS Bros podcast—helmed by comedians Dan St. Germaine and Shawn Donnelly—he emphasized how laughter can be both a coping mechanism and a tool for opening up tough subjects like the UFO phenomenon. It’s refreshing to hear that even those deep into this community don’t take themselves too seriously. As Patrick put it, for him, it’s entertainment—but there’s always someone willing to go further, diving in with a seriousness that’s both impressive and a little unnerving.

This playful tone is a crucial entry point. UFOs, aliens, and government secrecy can be dense, intimidating topics. Humor helps lift the fog, encourages open conversation, and reminds us not to lose perspective—even when claims become extraordinary. But sooner or later, the conversation does get serious, especially when you pivot to the world of whistleblowers and insiders like Danny Sheehan.

Unseen Wars and the Problem of Public Consent

The heart of Sheehan’s recent revelations is a jaw-dropping claim: certain individuals within our governments are allegedly engaging in acts that could be construed as war with non-human intelligences—without the public’s knowledge, consent, or oversight. The comparison to the Vietnam War is apt—except this time, it’s as if the war were being fought entirely in the shadows. Unlike Vietnam, where footage, reporting, and public protest played defining roles, this hypothetical “alien war” is happening behind closed doors. As Sheehan and Patrick both point out, you can’t organize a protest against something you don’t even know is happening.

Sheehan suggests that the first step toward restoring any semblance of democratic control is disclosure: making the public aware of what’s really going on. This, he argues, is critical not just for the sake of transparency, but for the well-being of society itself. If we’re headed for technological upheaval—such as the introduction of a revolutionary energy source that could topple existing industries—we need policies, institutions, and a public dialog ready to handle it. As Patrick notes in his follow-up, not only is the secrecy around these actions troubling, but the potential global ramifications—both political and economic—would be profound.

Are We Just Along for the Ride?

This secrecy raises profound questions. If there are world-altering decisions being made—decisions without public consent—where does that leave us? Patrick gets straight to the uncomfortable point: we’re like kids buckled into the backseat on a family road trip with no say in where the car is going, when it stops, or what route it takes. If there truly is an intergalactic conflict, or even just secret engagement with non-human intelligence, what rights do the people have to know, protest, or redirect those actions?

It’s a timely metaphor for how many of us feel about government policy in general—amplified to cosmic scale. Trust in institutions is shaky, and stories like these, whether entirely accurate or not, tap into a deep skepticism that ordinary people no longer have much say. If secrecy rules, how can democracy function? If decisions about the fate of humanity are happening in the dark, how do we as citizens demand a say?

The Search for Truth—And Why It Matters

Ultimately, whether or not you believe Sheehan’s more audacious claims, there is an urgent call here: for more openness, more honesty, and more public debate. The idea isn’t to panic or fall into paranoia, but to push for the kind of disclosure and transparency that strengthens democracy, not erodes it. UFOs and the possibility of non-human intelligence are not just fringe entertainment—they’re serious big-picture questions about who we are, what our future holds, and who gets to shape it.

Humor, skepticism, and seriousness all have their place in this ongoing conversation. As Patrick reminds us, we don’t have to choose absolute belief or utter dismissal—we can laugh, question, and demand answers all at once. Most of us “just want to talk, have some fun, and discuss the topic.” But as the stakes climb, that conversation becomes a foundation for action.

Conclusion: Don’t Let the Conversation Die in the Shadows

Whether there really are secret wars being waged in the darkness or just a massive environment of secrecy and speculation, the message is clear: democracy dies in darkness. If you care about the future—whether it’s energy policy, financial systems, or the cosmic question of alien life—the best thing you can do is stay informed, keep the dialog open, and demand real answers.

So, join the debate. Ask questions. Approach the unknown with both a sense of humor and a critical mind. And if someone tells you there’s a secret war going on above your head, don’t be afraid to ask “Says who?”—and insist on an answer. Every day is a gift, and that includes the right to know about the forces shaping our collective destiny.

Ross Coulthart Breaks Silence About Hidden Anti-Gravity Tech

What if we could push past the boundaries of gravity—the force that grounds us all? This tantalizing idea, anti-gravity, has captivated scientists, conspiracy theorists, and sci-fi enthusiasts for generations. It’s not just the stuff of Star Wars or comic books; the concept has sparked real research, heated debates, and a swirl of secretive government whispers. In this post, we’ll explore the rich, mysterious world of anti-gravity research—a rabbit hole that runs through history, science, and even claims of international cover-ups.

The Mystery and Allure of Anti-Gravity

There’s a deep human curiosity about conquering gravity. Imagine vehicles that cruise effortlessly above the earth, space travel without expensive rocket fuel, or energy breakthroughs that could change the world. The dream traces its roots all the way back to visionaries like Nikola Tesla, who speculated that electromagnetism could unlock new ways to manipulate gravity. Fast forward to the present: theoretical physicists explore wild ideas like exotic matter, negative energy, and the mind-bending mathematics of string theory. Yet, despite decades of creative thinking, tangible anti-gravity devices remain elusive.

Let’s not overlook the skeptics. Mainstream science is adamant: as of now, no verified anti-gravity technology exists. NASA’s Breakthrough Propulsion Physics Program, which ran from 1996 until 2002, found no practical methods—at least, not ones they’re willing to admit. Still, claims linger around contentious figures like Eugene Podkletnov, who reported experiments in “gravitational shielding.” Those results, however, lack independent verification and remain controversial.

The Shadowy World of Suppressed Breakthroughs

Enter a more shadowy angle: the notion of secret research and intentionally concealed advances. Some believe that anti-gravity breakthroughs may have occurred but are buried deep within black budget government programs for strategic advantage. The conversation gets lively with voices like Ross Coulthart and Eric Weinstein, who argue that powerful organizations have suppressed the science and, in doing so, stalled human progress for decades. According to these theories, the United States—and likely other nations—have worked on anti-gravity technology since at least the 1950s.

As those stories go, the trail of open research ‘went dark’ after dramatic advances. It’s suggested that modern physics itself has been nudged away from certain lines of inquiry to keep revolutionary discoveries under wraps. The frustration among those who sense this suppression is palpable: If such advancements exist, what could they do for the world if they were released? Could they open access to revolutionary energy systems, interstellar travel, or even entirely new ways of living?

Historically, researchers like Thomas Townsend Brown received considerable attention. Brown and his work on electrogravitics—a theoretical link between electricity and gravity—became fodder for speculation and investigation. Yet, it’s hard to prove where trailblazing science ends and clever myth-making begins. Even among those closest to the subject, there’s a chorus of “maybe” and “what if.”

Digging Into the Physics and the UFO Connection

Another fascinating twist is the link with UFO lore. Countless declassified documents and eyewitness accounts describe flying objects with shapes and behaviors matching what enthusiasts imagine for anti-gravity machines: flying saucers, Tic-Tac-shaped craft, and more. Some speculate these are experimental military vehicles built on anti-gravity breakthroughs. Others leap even further: Could humans have reverse-engineered alien technology?

Here’s where the story enters deep speculation. Some voices argue that, even if an advanced craft landed on our doorstep, reverse engineering it might be as impossible as expecting Neanderthals to rebuild an iPhone. The technological and theoretical chasms could be insurmountable. Without understanding the physics—and lacking the right tools, materials, or even conceptual frameworks—how would we begin? This humbling thought does little to dampen the imaginations of hopeful researchers or committed believers.

So, Where Do We Stand?

Is anti-gravity truly possible and hidden, or still a pipe dream? After decades of speculation, people still disagree. For every official statement debunking the notion, there’s a persistent trail of rumors, personal stories from military insiders, and unexplained sightings that keep the legend alive. The only thing most can agree on: if anti-gravity is real, its suppression could be one of the greatest lost opportunities—and mysteries—of our age.

If you’re hooked, you’re not alone. The anti-gravity question remains open, and the internet is alive with new deep-dives, historical document dumps, and passionate debate.

The Takeaway: Keep Questioning, Keep Imagining

One thing is clear: true progress only comes with open inquiry and a willingness to follow the unknown. Whether anti-gravity research is a buried goldmine or just the latest echo of humanity’s wishful thinking, its mystique isn’t going anywhere. For now, enjoy the rabbit hole—read, question, and engage. Perhaps the truth is stranger than any fiction, and the next great leap is just around the corner. So keep an open mind and never stop exploring. The universe, after all, still holds more secrets than we can imagine.

Jeremy Corbell Reveals New UFO Whistleblowers

The world of UFOs, or UAPs (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena), has always been shrouded in mystery, intrigue, and a fair bit of skepticism. But what happens when the people who claim to know the most – those often on the inside – are finally ready to speak out, not behind closed doors, but on the public record, under oath before Congress? That’s a scenario Patrick from Vetted explored after a recent update from investigative journalist Jeremy Corbell, whose definition of a “firsthand witness” could impact every discussion about UFO transparency in the U.S. and beyond.

The Promise of New Firsthand Whistleblowers

Recently, Jeremy Corbell announced something that sent ripples through the UFO community and beyond: three new firsthand whistleblowers are ready to testify at the next Congressional hearing on UAPs. Patrick’s video dives deep into the meaning of this claim, questioning not only who these individuals are, but also what their “firsthand” experience truly means.

The concept of a firsthand witness—especially in a realm as opaque as UFO research—has always been up for debate. Does it mean someone has simply seen a video or read a classified report, or have they actually come face to face with these mysterious crafts? The importance of this distinction cannot be overstated, since the credibility of Congressional testimony—and the weight it carries with both the public and policymakers—hinges on the exact nature and quality of eyewitness evidence.

Defining "Firsthand" in the Whistleblower Era

Prompted by Patrick’s inquisitiveness, Jeremy Corbell took the time to clarify his personal baseline for what counts as a firsthand UAP witness. According to Corbell, a firsthand whistleblower is not just anyone loosely connected to the phenomena. These individuals meet strict criteria:

They have served in an official government capacity and can verifiably prove they were in direct proximity to operational UAP technology—think military bases, Department of Defense sites, or specialized government laboratories.

They’ve unambiguously participated in key operations involving UAPs, such as testing, studying, protecting, or cataloging hardware or intelligence related to these crafts.

They possess hard evidence—substantiating who they are, what their role was, and their precise involvement—providing a solid foundation for their testimony.

But Corbell’s definition also recognizes layers within the realm of firsthand experiences. There are those involved in research or concealment programs, those with visual technical documentation, and others holding evidence of deliberate government cover-ups. In short: every valid witness, regardless of their ‘tier’, builds toward a more complete picture of the UAP mystery. Transparency, Corbell asserts, requires hearing from voices at all of these levels.

Why It Matters: Words Shape Our Perceptions

Patrick points out something vital—words matter, especially in controversial topics like UFO disclosure. The label “firsthand witness” can dramatically raise or lower expectations depending on how it’s defined. Without clarity, people risk misunderstanding the significance of the testimony offered. It’s easy for conversations to spiral into confusion or conspiracy if we don’t agree on the meaning of fundamental terms.

That’s why ongoing clarification, like the one Corbell provided, is so crucial. By demystifying what constitutes a valid firsthand account, public discussions can become more grounded, productive, and ultimately more influential on policy. If Congress, the media, or the public don’t know how direct an individual’s experience with UAPs is, how can we measure the importance or veracity of their claims?

Challenges for Whistleblowers: Courage in the Face of Risk

Gaining access to authentic firsthand accounts is no small feat. Many potential whistleblowers are deterred by threats, professional ruin, or fear for their safety. Jeremy Corbell and George Knapp, another prominent journalist, have emphasized that some insiders are prepared to come forward despite serious risks—sometimes under duress, sometimes after having faced intimidation tactics or even threats to their livelihoods and health.

Congressional allies, such as Representative Luna and Representative Burchett, are working across the aisle to ensure these individuals have the protection and opportunity to testify openly. Legislative efforts, including recent bipartisan attempts to enshrine UFO disclosure protocols, highlight that transparency on this topic is not a fringe interest, but a matter with growing support on Capitol Hill.

The Balancing Act: Skeptics, Believers, and the Need for Open Testimony

Patrick brings up an essential point: Whether you’re a diehard skeptic, a believer, or simply someone who wants to know the truth, allowing witnesses to testify is the only way to move the discussion forward. Refusal to hear witnesses not only hinders our search for answers, but undermines trust in the process itself.

We constantly ask for proof, for evidence, for someone in authority to step forward. So when credible individuals offer to share their stories under oath, the logical next step is to listen. As Patrick says, “We can decide on what they bring forward and the validity of it, but if we never hear it, how are we supposed to know? So, let them come forward and let them speak.”

A Call for UFO Transparency

The public, media, and Congress are all grappling with the same set of questions: What is the truth about UAPs, and who actually knows it? As new firsthand whistleblowers prepare to step into the spotlight, defining and understanding their experiences is more important than ever.

Ultimately, this conversation is about more than UFOs. It’s about transparency, accountability, and the right to know. It’s about recognizing the courage of those willing to speak truth to power, regardless of the consequences. If we want answers—and if we want progress—the first step is simple: Let them speak, and really listen to what they have to say. Our understanding of this phenomenon, and perhaps even of our place in the universe, may depend on it.