Whistleblower Dylan Borland Drops UFO Bombshell

When Dylan Borland, a former U.S. Air Force geospatial intelligence specialist, testified before Congress in September 2025, few expected his story to ignite such intense debate.

Borland’s claims—ranging from a firsthand UFO encounter at Langley Air Force Base to drawings allegedly classified into a Special Access Program (SAP)—have made him one of the most controversial figures in the modern UFO disclosure movement.

Now, following his two‑part interview on Jeremy Corbell and George Knapp’s Weaponized podcast, Borland’s story is being dissected by journalists, skeptics, and believers alike.

Who Is Dylan Borland?

Before becoming a whistleblower, Borland served as a geospatial intelligence specialist in the U.S. Air Force. His background gave him direct access to satellite imagery, reconnaissance data, and classified aerospace programs.

According to Borland, his life changed in 2012 while stationed at Langley Air Force Base, Virginia.

“I witnessed an approximately 100‑foot equilateral triangle craft taking off near a NASA hangar and flying within 100 feet of me,” he testified.

The craft, he said, was silent, composed of a fluid or dynamic material, and displayed flight characteristics far beyond known U.S. or foreign technology.

The Langley Encounter

Borland described the object as unlike anything he had ever seen in his military career:

• It hovered silently, then accelerated vertically without sound.

• The surface appeared to ripple like liquid metal.

• It emitted no exhaust, heat, or conventional propulsion signature.

“The technology was not consistent with U.S. or foreign capabilities,” he stated.

For Borland, that moment confirmed something extraordinary—that humanity is not alone, and that some branch of government or private industry may already know it.

Retaliation and Reprisals

After reporting the incident through official channels, Borland claims he faced over a decade of retaliation from government agencies:

• Career obstruction and demotions.

• Medical malpractice and psychological targeting.

• Workplace harassment and intimidation.

These alleged reprisals, he said, were part of a coordinated effort to silence him and others with direct knowledge of legacy UAP programs.

“Because of my direct knowledge, I’ve faced sustained reprisals for more than ten years,” Borland told Congress.

His story echoes that of other whistleblowers like David Grusch, who also alleged intimidation after disclosing information about hidden UAP programs.

The Brake Line Incident

In one of the most disturbing parts of his testimony, Borland claimed that someone sabotaged his car in an apparent attempt on his life.

“The police told me in confidence that my brake lines were cut,” he said. “They wanted it to look like a suicide.”

However, as Patrick from Vetted points out in his analysis, no official police report has confirmed that the brake lines were cut—raising questions about what really happened.

“If a cop said that, there’d be an attempted murder investigation,” Patrick notes. “So where’s the documentation?”

The mystery remains unresolved.

The Classified Drawings

Perhaps Borland’s most intriguing claim involves three drawings he submitted to government investigators.

“I provided three rudimentary drawings—one unclassified, and two that were immediately thrown into a SAP,” he said. “The two that were classified prove we are not alone.”

In U.S. defense terminology, a SAP (Special Access Program) is a compartmentalized project so secret that only a handful of cleared individuals can access it.

The idea that two simple drawings could be instantly classified suggests they contained information deemed highly sensitive—perhaps related to non‑human technology or reverse‑engineering programs.

Patrick, analyzing the interview, asks the obvious question:

“How can a hand‑drawn sketch be so important that it gets locked into a SAP? What could possibly be in those drawings?”

The “Swiss Cheese” Drawing

In the Vetted episode, Patrick humorously describes the only drawing shown publicly as resembling “Swiss cheese”—a rough sketch of a triangular craft with circular cutouts.

“Let’s be real—it looks like cheese,” he jokes. “So what made the other two so different that they were classified?”

Speculation abounds that the other two drawings may have included structural details, energy patterns, or symbols associated with the craft—details that might correspond to known classified materials.

The Bigger Picture: Whistleblowers and UFO Secrecy

Borland’s story fits into a growing pattern of UAP whistleblowers emerging since 2023.

Figures like David Grusch, Ryan Graves, and Lt. Cmdr. Alex Dietrich have all testified about unexplained encounters or secret programs.

The central allegation: that the U.S. government and private contractors are in possession of non‑human craft and materials, hidden under layers of corporate and military secrecy.

Borland’s testimony adds a personal dimension—one of fear, retaliation, and frustration with a system that silences those trying to speak truth.

Fear, Courage, and the Cost of Disclosure

During his congressional testimony, Borland was asked whether he feared for his life.

“If I say the wrong word, technically I can be charged with espionage,” he said. “Espionage is a death penalty. Whistleblowers have faced it. But I’m not scared of an agency coming to kill me.”

That statement underscores the high stakes of speaking publicly about classified information. Even hinting at what’s inside a SAP can lead to prosecution under national security laws.

Yet Borland insists that bringing truth to light is worth the risk.

“This is the most important issue of our lifetime,” he told Corbell and Knapp. “If what I know is true, it could change humanity forever.”

The Public Reaction

The UFO community has been divided.

• Believers hail Borland as another courageous insider confirming decades of rumors.

• Skeptics question the lack of physical evidence—especially the missing police report and the vague nature of the drawings.

Still, even critics admit that Borland’s credentials and demeanor lend him credibility. He doesn’t sound like a fantasist—he sounds like a man burdened by secrets.

What Comes Next

Patrick speculates that the Weaponized interview is only Part Two of a larger story, with a Part Three likely to reveal the unclassified drawing in full.

If that happens, analysts and enthusiasts will dissect every line, curve, and symbol—searching for clues about what Borland might have seen that night at Langley.

Until then, the mystery remains sealed inside a SAP—along with whatever evidence might “prove we’re not alone.”

Key Takeaways

• Dylan Borland claims to have witnessed a 100‑foot triangular craft at Langley AFB in 2012.

• His drawings of the craft were allegedly classified into a Special Access Program (SAP).

• He says he faced harassment and retaliation for over a decade after reporting the incident.

• A brake line sabotage incident remains unverified but adds to the intrigue.

• His story joins a wave of UAP whistleblower testimonies calling for transparency.

FAQ: Dylan Borland and the UFO Disclosure Movement

Q: Who is Dylan Borland?
A former U.S. Air Force geospatial intelligence specialist who became a whistleblower after witnessing a UFO at Langley AFB.

Q: What is a Special Access Program (SAP)?
A highly classified project that restricts access to a small number of cleared individuals, often used for advanced defense or intelligence work.

Q: Did Borland provide physical evidence?
So far, only one unclassified drawing has been shown publicly. The other two remain locked in a SAP.

Q: Has his story been verified?
Independent verification is limited, though his testimony was entered into the congressional record.

Q: Why does his story matter?
Because it adds firsthand military testimony to a growing body of evidence suggesting the U.S. government is concealing information about non‑human technology.