NEW Data Released about Colombia UFO Sphere
Interest in the Buga Sphere from Colombia has grown with new scientific investigations revealing its unusual physical properties. Recent x-ray analysis shows that the object is composed of several distinct layers, each with different densities, and contains structures like micro-spheres and possibly metallic elements. Experts note the lack of any visible seams or evidence of assembly, suggesting a unique and complex manufacturing process.
Research into this sphere remains ongoing, with specialists unable to fully explain its origins or function. The sphere's movement and variable weight, documented in several observations, add to the mystery, emphasizing the need for further study to understand this unique object.
Key Takeaways
Recent tests reveal complex internal structures and densities within the Buga Sphere.
No evidence of ornamental use or conventional assembly has been found.
Experts stress the need for more research due to unexplained characteristics.
History and Location of the Buga Sphere
How the Object Was Found and Where It Was Located
The object known as the Buga Sphere came to attention after it was observed falling to the ground in Buga, Colombia. Its descent followed a direct impact from a 10,000-volt discharge, after which it was examined by specialists on May 1, 2025. The site of its landing and the circumstances of its fall have contributed to ongoing curiosity and investigation.
A detailed analysis using x-rays revealed a dense, solid exterior, with several internal layers of different densities. The examinations also identified multiple small points around the core, believed to be micro-spheres, and unique material distributions not typical of known artifacts.
Aspect
Location
Date of Examination
Circumstances Found
Notable Features
Detail
Buga, Colombia
May 1, 2025
Fell post high-voltage discharge
Multiple density layers, absence of weld marks
Early Reports and Public Attention
From its initial discovery, the Buga Sphere quickly generated public and media interest. Investigators used advanced imaging such as radiology to study its internal composition and structure. Several specialists agreed that its build was highly complex and displayed characteristics pointing to artificial origin.
Early coverage included multiple videos taken from different angles by individuals at the scene. The footage documented not only its fall but also its unusual movement patterns, such as spinning and drifting mid-air before coming to rest. Reports consistently highlighted the lack of ornamental or decorative purpose, reinforcing its mystery and intrigue.
Scientific Analysis of the Sphere
X-Ray Investigation Led by Velázquez
Specialist José Luis Velázquez conducted X-ray imaging on the Buga sphere following its high-voltage exposure. The results revealed a clear, thick outer boundary in white tones, signaling a dense layer, while grey regions suggested inner material of lower density. The imaging technique allowed a noninvasive look, confirming that the sphere is primarily solid with no significant hollows.
Layer Distribution and Density Variations
According to the X-ray results, the sphere consists of multiple layers with distinct densities. Observers identified at least three separate layers, each varying in density as you move towards the core. This stratified internal structure has been compared to geological layers, with denser materials deeper inside and thinner layers closer to the surface, which helps explain the sphere’s unusual and variable weight.
Detection of Small Spheres and Core Components
The scans identified several small points—described as micro-spheres—surrounding the sphere's core. Sixteen microscopic spheres were observed within the interior, while 32 similar points were documented around its circumference. There is an additional element of lower density, possibly porous, distributed centrally within the structure. These features indicate multiple discrete components with varied characteristics inside the object.
Material Properties and Construction Findings
Analysis of the images suggests the presence of substances with properties and densities consistent with metals. The arrangement of these inner points and layers appears uniform, supporting the idea of an artificial origin. No seams, welds, or joints were detected on the outer shell, which indicates the sphere is constructed as a single continuous piece rather than assembled from parts. The structure’s complexity and lack of any decorative or ornamental features further differentiate it from known artifacts reviewed by the investigators. The preliminary conclusions call for continued testing to better establish the sphere's origins and material composition.
Key Physical Observations:
Feature
External shell
Internal layering
Micro-spheres
Core material
Construction
Material indicators
Observation
Thick, high-density layer (white X-ray tone)
Multiple layers of varying density (minimum three detected)
16 internally, 32 on circumference
Central low-density/possibly porous element
Single, seamless structure; no evidence of welding or joining
Densities suggest metals; homogeneous distribution of elements
Opinions from Subject Matter Experts and Research Analysis
Key Points from Nacho Rojo
Artificial Construction: Nacho Rojo noted that the sphere appears artificially made. He argues that its internal makeup is complex, with multiple layers and materials of different densities—suggesting it was purposely assembled.
No Signs of Ornamentation: The sphere does not match any known decorative items. Rojo ruled out the possibility that it was created for ornamental use.
Structural Integrity: Imaging tests revealed that the sphere is mainly solid, not hollow. No joints, welds, or points of attachment were found, pointing to a structure forged as a single unit.
Unique Characteristics: Rojo pointed out that he has never come across a piece quite like this, even after extensive experience analyzing objects of various materials (such as metal, stone, and wood).
Further Study Needed: He emphasized the need for more detailed examination and additional tests to gain a better understanding of the sphere’s origin and composition.
Observation
Internal Structure
Decorative Purpose
Assembly/Evidence of Joints
Material Density
Recommendation
Details
Multiple dense layers, not hollow
Ruled out
None detected
Likely metallic, highly variable
More testing required
Analysis from Jaime Maussan
Unusual Behavior Observed: Jaime Maussan described how the sphere appeared to spin like a top and move with precision. In one account, it seemed to descend as if unable to levitate further, indicating unexplained movement patterns.
Multiple Angle Recordings: Maussan explained that the object was recorded by two observers from different positions at the same time, confirming the sphere’s presence and activity from separate viewpoints.
Comparison to Known Phenomena: By highlighting concurrent video recordings, Maussan stressed the rarity of such events, especially since no visible means of propulsion or support were observed.
Summary List of Maussan’s Main Points:
The sphere executed movements unlike common objects.
Confirmed sightings from two locations at the same moment.
Highlights the need to analyze these rare instances further.
Distinctive Material and Build Features
Lack of Seams or External Bonding Marks
Analysis by radiography specialists found no signs of welding, soldering, or visible joining points on the Bouga sphere. The object presents as a single, continuous structure rather than two or more pieces joined together. Even upon close examination, typical lines or marks of assembly are absent, setting it apart from conventional manufactured objects.
Inspection Aspect
Welding/Soldering Marks
Joint Lines/Seams
Structural Continuity
Observation
None detected
Not observed
Consistent, seamless form
Investigators highlight that this is unusual compared to other metal, stone, or composite artifacts they have examined, where joins or seams are generally apparent.
Signs of Engineered Composition
Multiple internal layers with distinct densities are visible under X-ray imaging, suggesting a complex build of artificial origin. The density variations reveal at least three separate layers, including a thick outer shell, and several concentrated points (interpreted as micro-spheres) arranged evenly in the internal structure.
Material Distribution: Elements inside the sphere show a homogeneous metallic distribution.
Structural Features: Between 16 and 32 dense points are aligned symmetrically around the core, which is rare in natural formations.
Consistency: No signs of fragmentation or material detachment appeared in the scans, indicating a solid, intact entity.
Interpretation:
The findings suggest the sphere's interior was deliberately arranged rather than naturally developed. The absence of ornamental intent and the atypical internal configuration, according to analysts, provide evidence supporting an artificial and engineered manufacture, not a decorative or geologic object.
Notable Actions and Confirmed Events
Tracked Motion and Lifting
The sphere was observed spinning in place like a top and displayed the ability to float above the ground before descending. Witnesses described how it would lift itself up, reach considerable height, and then appear to lose its ability to stay airborne, causing it to come back down. These behaviors were consistent each time it was monitored.
A summary table is provided for clarity:
Behavior
Spinning
Levitation
Descent
Description
Rotates on its axis, similar to a child's top
Rises unaided to significant heights
Gradually returns to the ground after lifting
Multiple Perspectives Captured
There were simultaneous recordings of the sphere made from two different positions. Individuals at separate locations documented the same event, providing viewpoints from various angles at the same time. This approach allowed observers to verify the movements and characteristics of the object without reliance on a single source.
Key points include:
Two independent recordings taken concurrently
Confirmed movement from various positions
Reduced potential for observation errors through cross-verification
Implications and Unanswered Questions
The radiographic analysis of the Buga sphere has revealed multiple layers with distinct densities, indicating a complex internal architecture. Investigators noted at least three layers, ranging from very dense to porously less dense material, and observed clusters of micro-spheres and evenly distributed points around the circumference. No hollow sections were found, suggesting a solid structure.
Findings:
The structure showed no evidence of external joins or welds, strengthening the interpretation that it was not assembled from multiple pieces.
X-ray imagery signaled differences in material density with indications that some layers could be metallic.
Observers identified that the object's weight does not correspond to expected values based on its apparent size and material, which remains unexplained.
Outstanding Questions:
Area of Uncertainty
Origin and Purpose
Materials and Composition
Mechanism of Movement
Integrity and Structure
Weight Anomaly
Key Questions
What is the original function of the sphere and who created it?
What are the precise materials involved, especially the metals?
How can the sphere move through the air without visible means?
How was it formed so seamlessly with no welds or join marks?
Why does the sphere’s mass appear variable or higher than expected?
Despite detailed imaging, analysts agree that additional studies are required to clarify its origin and ultimate purpose. The lack of ornamental features and unusual movement patterns only deepen the mystery, leaving professionals with more questions than answers. Further investigation is necessary to determine if the sphere’s composition could suggest an extraterrestrial or unknown origin.
Final Thoughts
The X-ray analysis of the Buga sphere revealed several distinct layers, each with its own density. Experts observed that the sphere has no visible welds or points of assembly, indicating it is a single, solid structure rather than assembled from separate parts. Dense outer layers and varied internal compositions suggest complexity beyond common objects.
Notable Observations:
Multiple layers with different densities
No evidence of internal hollowness
Absence of welds or joins
Potential presence of metals based on density
Homogeneous distribution of internal elements
According to specialists, no ornamental or decorative purpose could be identified for the sphere. X-ray results showed 16 micro-spheres around the nucleus and 32 evenly spaced points along the circumference, further highlighting its irregular design.
Despite thorough investigation, the sphere's artificial and unusual composition and lack of familiar manufacturing marks have led researchers to recommend more tests to determine its exact origin. Its ability to move without visible means and the confusion expressed by experts support the call for continued analysis.
