David Grusch Comes Clean About UFOs

It feels like every week, the conversation around UFOs—or should we now say, UAPs—ramps up another notch. If you've ever scrolled through your feed and wondered, “Why is everyone suddenly talking about aliens again?” you're not alone. The mystery of extraterrestrial life and non-human intelligence continues to captivate imaginations, spark debate, and occasionally, frustration. Today, let's unpack the latest wave stirred by political journalist Walter Kern's explosive comments quoting UFO whistleblower David Grusch, and what his insights really mean for the ongoing age of UFO disclosure.

The Legendary Whistleblower and the Evolution of UFO Language

First things first: who are the key players? David Grusch, a former Air Force official turned whistleblower, has quietly become one of the most trusted sources in the UFO community. Kern, who first wrote about Grusch years ago in an investigative piece, recently resurfaced some of Grusch’s insights during an interview with Megan Kelly. What made this conversation different is that Grusch, behind the scenes, gave Kern a bit more permission than usual to speak directly about what he knows—and it's sending ripples through the community.

One bombshell statement stands above the rest: "The problem with the aliens is that we care a lot about them, but they don't care a lot about us." On the surface, it’s a classic example of the one-way mirror dilemma. Humanity is obsessed with the unknown, but the unknown? It might just be ambivalent about us. But what does that really mean, especially if true government investigations have uncovered non-human sentience—or as the terminology now shifts, “non-human intelligence”?

Tracing the Shifting Terms: Aliens, Non-Human Intelligence, Non-Human Sentience

Words matter a great deal in the realm of disclosure, and the way officials discuss the subject has undergone repeated makeovers. Gone are the days of “UFOs” and “aliens.” Now, we hear “UAPs” (unidentified aerial phenomena), “non-human intelligence,” and most recently, “non-human sentience.” This can make the subject even more confusing for the public but also hints at a deeper reality: our understanding is evolving, and so is the language used to shape public opinion.

Kern and Grusch both address something that makes many listeners prick up their ears: claims of physical artifacts and bodies recovered from unexplained phenomena. Grusch asserts that he’s read the intelligence, seen the data, and been partially cleared into these mysterious programs. When pressed, he reportedly confirmed: yes, craft have been recovered, and yes, so have the bodies—though exactly what those bodies are, nobody’s yet ready to say in clear, uncompromising terms.

Skepticism Versus Belief: Who Decides What’s Real?

For every person who hears these stories and feels a thrill of belief, there’s another who raises an eyebrow in doubt. The recent documentary “Age of Disclosure” and Patrick’s upcoming film “Psionics” highlight this divide. While the former leans heavily into belief and sensational claims, Patrick insists his own documentary acts as a “mirror”—showing what’s presented, but not passing judgment. This open, objective lens is rare in a field crowded with people who have something to prove or an agenda to push.

Walter Kern, playing the role of confidant to Grusch, straddles this line. On one hand, he expresses deep belief in Grusch’s trustworthiness and the existence of “other” beings. On the other, he admits to the inherent uncertainty: the universe is vast, and we’ve only just begun understanding it. Comparisons to historical discoveries—like the gorilla, once thought mythical before being recognized by science—underscore humanity’s tendency to fill in the blanks before all the facts are available. The difference with UFOs is that the stakes feel so much higher.

Political Intrigue: Who Really Holds the Keys to Disclosure?

Sprinkled throughout these revelations is a healthy dose of intrigue. Kern reveals, based on conversations with Grusch, that secret keepers like Dick Cheney have allegedly sat at the top of the so-called “UFO pyramid.” Now, with Cheney gone and the possibility that figures like Donald Trump might blow the whistle further, the disclosure landscape is as much about politics as it is about science or evidence.

This injection of partisanship can be frustrating for enthusiasts who’d rather see the search for truth be bipartisan—or better, apolitical. Yet, as with many issues in modern America, the message may be fumbled more by the messengers than by the actual evidence. The takeaway? Until trusted people from both sides of the aisle can come together and reveal watertight proof, disclosure will remain fertile ground for speculation, memes, and late-night debates.

Where Is the Evidence? And What Happens If It Never Arrives?

A big criticism in Patrick’s video is the lack of public evidence. There are stories, interviews, and whispers about crashed craft, warring alien factions, reverse-engineered technology, and more. Yet, for all the storytelling and terminology shifts, nothing solid has been unveiled to settle the debate once and for all. The analogy to mountain lions—believed in but rarely seen—serves to illustrate just how ephemeral much of the evidence remains. Until someone rolls out a craft over a major city or scientists from multiple fields step forward in unison, we’re left guessing.

What’s refreshing in Patrick’s coverage is his insistence that his documentary simply reflects what was shown to him, without the pomp and certainty of some other productions. His goal? To get people to think for themselves. In a world drowning in clickbait and echo chambers, that’s a much-needed perspective.

Personal Stories and The Human Connection

Mixed into the whirlwind of political speculation and journalistic intrigue are real people with real experiences. A listener from New Zealand shares a personal encounter: a quiet, strange craft gliding overhead during a school trip. These stories matter—not because they prove anything on their own, but because they remind us that curiosity, wonder, and a hint of fear are universal.

Conclusion: Inviting Curiosity, Embracing Uncertainty

So, where does this leave us? With an evolving language, tantalizing (but unverified) claims, and a cast of credible-yet-cautious whistleblowers, the question of non-human sentience remains as captivating—and elusive—as ever. Maybe one day the mountain lion will stride out from the forest and stand in the clear light of day. Until then, the most important thing we can do is stay curious, ask for evidence, and keep the conversation open for everyone. Because at the end of the day, whether or not we’re being visited by something out of this world, the real challenge is figuring out what we want to believe—and why. Stay skeptical, stay hopeful, and above all, keep looking up. Every day really is a gift.