New UFO Whistleblower Comes Forward (Videos, Photos & Physical Evidence)
The UFO disclosure movement has been dominated for years by military insiders, defense contractors, and intelligence officials. But in 2025, a new name has entered the conversation—Michael, a civilian who claims to have stumbled upon extraordinary evidence of anomalous technology.
What makes Michael’s case different is not just the evidence he claims to hold, but the fact that he is not tied to the government, the Pentagon, or aerospace corporations. Instead, he is described as a businessman with a science background who unexpectedly found himself in possession of material he believes could be either highly advanced human technology or something non-human in origin.
What Evidence Does Michael Claim to Have?
According to his attorney, Ivan Hunnel (who has also represented well-known UFO figure Luis Elizondo), Michael has provided:
Photographs and videos of alleged anomalous craft or technology.
Physical materials that may be linked to unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP).
Documentation and communications that suggest his findings have been shared with Senate committees and the Pentagon’s All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO).
This puts Michael in a unique position: he is not just offering testimony, but tangible artifacts that, if verified, could become some of the most compelling evidence in the history of UFO research.
Why Michael’s Case Is Unprecedented
Most whistleblowers who have come forward in recent years—such as David Grusch—have been insiders with direct knowledge of classified programs. Michael, however, is a civilian outsider, which raises several important questions:
How did he obtain this evidence?
If the materials are genuine, their origin could point to either private aerospace projects or something far stranger.What protections does he have?
Whistleblower protections are typically designed for government employees or contractors. Michael’s civilian status could complicate his legal standing.What does his lawyer’s involvement suggest?
The fact that Ivan Hunnel, a high-profile attorney in the UFO disclosure movement, is representing him signals that Michael’s claims are being taken seriously by at least some in the legal and political community.
Tim Phillips’ Explosive Extortion Allegations
The controversy surrounding Michael intensified when Tim Phillips, former deputy director of AARO, made startling claims in an interview with skeptic researcher Mick West.
Phillips alleged that Michael had attempted to “extort” the U.S. government by offering to sell his evidence or threatening to provide it to a foreign power. According to Phillips, the matter was serious enough that it was referred to the FBI for investigation.
If true, these allegations could undermine Michael’s credibility and paint him as someone motivated by profit rather than disclosure. However, Michael’s attorney has strongly denied these claims, insisting that his client is a patriotic American acting in good faith.
This clash of narratives—between Phillips’ accusations and Hunnel’s defense—has left the UFO community divided.
Congressional Support: Rep. Eric Berles Weighs In
Adding another layer to the story, Representative Eric Berles has reportedly made surprising public statements about Michael’s case. While details are still emerging, Berles suggested that Michael’s evidence is credible enough to warrant attention from both Congress and AARO.
This is significant because congressional backing has been crucial in keeping UFO disclosure alive in Washington. Without lawmakers pushing for transparency, many whistleblower claims would never see the light of day.
The Bigger Picture: UFO Disclosure in 2025
Michael’s emergence comes at a pivotal time. In recent years, the U.S. government has:
Declassified Navy UFO videos showing unidentified objects performing maneuvers beyond known human capabilities.
Established AARO to investigate UAP sightings across military and civilian domains.
Heard testimony from whistleblowers like David Grusch, who claimed the U.S. is hiding crash retrieval and reverse-engineering programs.
Against this backdrop, Michael’s claims could either:
Validate the disclosure movement by providing hard evidence from outside government channels.
Or, if discredited, fuel skepticism and weaken the credibility of other whistleblowers.
What Happens Next?
Michael’s attorney has hinted that he may go public within weeks, releasing his evidence directly to the public if the government does not engage with him.
If that happens, several scenarios are possible:
Independent Verification – Scientists and labs may be asked to analyze his physical materials.
Media Frenzy – Mainstream outlets could seize on the story, especially if photos or videos appear compelling.
Government Pushback – If the allegations of extortion gain traction, Michael may face legal or reputational challenges.
Either way, the coming months could prove decisive not just for Michael, but for the broader UFO disclosure movement.
Key Takeaways
Michael is the first civilian UFO whistleblower to gain significant attention.
He claims to hold photos, videos, and physical evidence of anomalous technology.
Tim Phillips has accused him of attempted extortion, but his lawyer denies it.
Rep. Eric Berles has suggested Michael’s claims deserve serious review.
The case could either advance UFO disclosure or become another controversial chapter.
FAQ: Civilian UFO Whistleblower “Michael”
Q: Who is Michael, the UFO whistleblower?
A civilian businessman with a science background who claims to have evidence of anomalous technology.
Q: What kind of evidence does he claim to have?
Photos, videos, and physical materials that may be linked to unidentified aerial phenomena.
Q: Why is his case different from other whistleblowers?
He is not a government insider—making him the first civilian to step forward with alleged UFO evidence.
Q: What did Tim Phillips accuse him of?
Phillips claimed Michael tried to extort the U.S. government, though Michael’s lawyer disputes this.
Q: Will Michael go public?
His lawyer has suggested he may reveal his identity and evidence soon if the government does not cooperate.
Final Thoughts
Michael’s story is still unfolding, but it highlights the growing complexity of UFO disclosure in 2025. With government insiders, skeptical researchers, lawyers, and now civilians all entering the debate, the question remains:
Is humanity on the brink of undeniable evidence—or are we witnessing another cycle of controversy and speculation?
Either way, Michael’s case is one worth watching.
