FOUR NEW UFO VIDEOS Released by Former Border and Customs Agent Bob Thompson
Public interest in unexplained aerial phenomena continues to grow as new evidence comes to light. Recently, four previously unseen UFO videos surfaced, shared by an industry insider with years of direct experience in border security operations. These recordings, taken near the US-Mexico border, offer a rare look into objects observed by surveillance teams responsible for national security.
The individual at the center of these releases is Bob Thompson, a former Army veteran and federal agent deeply involved in counterterrorism and airspace monitoring. Thompson’s decision to step forward with these videos is noteworthy due to his first-hand experience and prior reluctance to publicly discuss these encounters. The videos have already prompted analysis and debate, raising questions about their implications and challenging viewers to interpret the footage with a critical eye.
Key Takeaways
New UFO videos were released by an experienced border security agent.
The footage includes detailed analysis and discussion of two notable sightings.
These events highlight potential concerns for airspace safety and community research.
Who Is Bob Thompson?
Service in the Military and Federal Agencies
Bob Thompson has an extensive background in both military and federal service. He served for 11 years in the US military before joining the Tucson Area Fire Department as a paramedic and hazardous materials technician. Afterwards, he moved to US Customs and Border Protection, beginning his role there in January 2008. Over 14 years, he focused on border security, counterterrorism, and drug interdiction, and was later assigned to the Arizona Air Coordination Center.
Experience:
US Military
Fire Department
Border Protection
Role
Service Member
Paramedic and Hazmat Technician
Special Ops and Air Coordination Center
Duration
11 years
Not stated
14 years
Sightings and Incidents Near the Border
During his work monitoring the US-Mexico border, Thompson encountered and documented multiple unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) using surveillance technology. He was part of a specialized team that handled issues beyond standard law enforcement duties. These incidents included objects tracked by government systems set up primarily for counter-drug and immigration enforcement, some of which became notable cases. He also reported hearing about similar encounters from numerous other agents on the ground.
Key Details:
Multiple events involving unidentified objects were captured on video.
These objects performed maneuvers that did not match known aircraft.
Teams worked around the clock and saw incidents unrelated to their usual duties.
Early Disclosures and Public Statements
Although recent interviews describe Thompson’s disclosures as a first, he previously came forward with information and videos as early as 2022. At that time, he spoke publicly about his experiences, and media outlets covered his accounts. This included details of aerial encounters at the border, his written reports to superiors, and his view that such events should be treated as serious security concerns.
Notable Points:
He released at least one video ahead of the more recent four videos.
He has consistently emphasized the need for official attention to these matters.
Other agents have supported his accounts with similar stories of UAP sightings.
Summary of the Latest Four UFO Recordings
Why These Recent Videos Matter
Bob Thompson, a veteran with extensive experience in border security and surveillance operations, has chosen to reveal four new UFO recordings. These videos were presented for the first time with detailed context, marking a rare disclosure by an insider with direct involvement in airspace monitoring. The footage comes from surveillance aircraft working along the US border, an area with ongoing aerial observation for national security.
Key Points:
The videos capture anomalous objects observed during routine border surveillance.
These objects appeared in restricted airspace, raising security concerns.
The release offers a unique perspective from a professional not previously visible to the public.
Name of Video
"Cigar"
"Rubber Ducky"
Main Features
Short, stubby cylinder; blurry footage; possible trail
Duck-like shape, possible two parts
Recorded By
Same agent as "Rubber Ducky" video
Border surveillance team
Notable Details
Movement appears fast; video clarity is low
Analyzed by the Scientific Coalition for UAP Studies
Relationship to Earlier Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Incidents
The newly revealed recordings fit a pattern reported by several border security personnel over many years. While Bob Thompson's public appearance is highlighted as a first, he has previously discussed sightings and released related videos. This set, however, represents new material not shown to the public until now.
Past accounts from border agents describe similar unexplained objects.
The rubber duck footage was sent for scientific analysis, reinforcing parallels with earlier military pilots' encounters.
Federal surveillance systems tasked with drug enforcement also regularly capture unexplained aerial activity.
These new videos are considered part of an ongoing, broader phenomenon observed by both military and civilian authorities.
Examination of the Cigar-Shaped UFO Footage
Appearance and Notable Features
The object in the footage is commonly referred to as the "cigar" due to its short, stubby cylindrical shape. Visually, it appears blurry and lacks sharp detail, which makes analyzing its finer features difficult. Observers noted that the object seems to move quickly across the frame, but factors such as parallax might contribute to this impression.
Shape: Short, cylindrical; resembles a stubby cigar
Clarity: Low resolution, heavy pixelation, overall blurriness
Movement: Appears rapid, but speed could be an effect of camera perspective
Visual Artifacts: Possible trail noted, but may be camera artifacts or pixelization
Aspect
Shape
Video Quality
Apparent Speed
Additional Marks
Observation
Stubby, cigar-like cylinder
Very blurry, low detail
Fast-moving (potential parallax effect)
Faint "trail" that could be artifact or real
Interpretations and Data Shortcomings
The video does not contain enough clear data to draw strong conclusions about the object's identity. The visible "trail" could be a camera artifact from pixelation, but could also represent something attached to or emanating from the object; this cannot be determined with certainty due to the poor video quality.
Analysts were unable to extract any readable data from the original recording, and no additional contextual information was visible. Because of these shortcomings, this footage was not regarded as valuable compared to other videos in the series.
Key Limitations:
Insufficient visual clarity prevents a thorough assessment.
Anomalous features could easily be artifacts of the camera system.
No readable or extractable data within the original recording.
Possible Explanations:
The object may be a fast-moving aerial device, though video limitations hinder confirmation.
Artifacts and pixelation may be misleading observers about the object's shape or speed.
The unclear "trail" could be a result of video compression or environmental factors, but cannot be verified with the available material.
In summary, the footage presents an ambiguous object with unclear characteristics, and the lack of supporting data makes it challenging to identify or assess its origin or nature.
Closer Look at the Rubber Duck UFO Footage
Distinctive Characteristics of the Rubber Duck Object
The object in the video stands out due to its unique silhouette that closely resembles a rubber duck. Observers note an atypical shape, which gives rise to questions about whether it represents a single solid structure or possibly two separate components traveling together.
There is no visible suspension or obvious attachment, such as a string or cable, beneath or above the object.
In the darker portions of the footage, the separation between the forms is especially pronounced, reinforcing speculation about multiple objects.
Despite the odd shape, no overt features like propulsion systems or standard flight surfaces can be seen.
Key Points from the Scientific Coalition’s Study
The video was reviewed by the Scientific Coalition for UAP Studies, an organization known for analytical assessment of unexplained aerial phenomena. Their findings were significant:
Aspect Evaluated
Anomalous Behavior
Appearance of Known Aircraft
Balloon or Debris Explanation
Coalition Determination
Yes
No
Unlikely
Their analysis concluded that the item captured is anomalous and does not match conventional aerial objects or atmospheric phenomena typically encountered in such surveillance operations.
Hypotheses Concerning What the Object Might Be
There has been ongoing discussion over the true nature of the object featured in the rubber duck video.
Some propose it could simply be a balloon, though the lack of any connecting string or weighted component undermines this interpretation.
Others speculate about the possibility of two objects moving in close proximity, given the apparent division visible in certain light conditions.
The odd configuration and the absence of any clear identification markers leave the object's identity unresolved, prompting both public and analytical interest.
Effects on Border Protection
Risks Posed to Safety and Security
Encountering unexplained aerial objects near national boundaries raises questions about the ability to secure those areas. Employees frequently see phenomena they cannot identify while using technology meant for surveillance and tracking border threats.
Border personnel are tasked with monitoring for illegal activities, but ongoing sightings of strange objects present a new challenge. These instances can cause concern among agents, especially when routine detection systems capture unidentified movements in protected airspace.
Observation
Frequent sightings
Unknown aerial activity
Unclear classifications
Impact on Security
May indicate surveillance vulnerabilities
Requires updated protocols
Hinders risk assessment
Official Actions Surrounding Unexplained Aerial Events
Personnel have reported their findings through formal channels, often submitting detailed reports about unexplained incidents. Some agents have expressed concern over a lack of strong response from higher authorities, which could signal gaps in the existing approach to aerial threats.
Agents have shared video evidence with scientific organizations for further study.
Permission has been granted in select cases to make findings public and discuss them openly.
Despite repeated monitoring, responses from leadership have sometimes fallen short, leaving agents uncertain about the appropriate procedures for future encounters.
Clarification from agency leadership and clear guidance remain necessary to address novel aerial phenomena within the scope of border operations.
Community Interaction and Ongoing Study
Community involvement is essential in exploring these sightings. Viewer comments often highlight different interpretations and suggest alternative explanations. Sharing opinions in the comments section fosters active discussion and helps surface new questions. Community feedback sometimes draws attention to overlooked details, such as possible camera artifacts or parallax effects in the footage.
Further investigation is needed for several of the video cases, especially those that lack clear details or exhibit unusual characteristics. For example, some footage was shared with organizations like the Scientific Coalition for UAP Studies for technical analysis. These analyses sometimes reach clear conclusions, but in other cases, the available data does not allow for a firm determination.
Video Name:
Cigar Video
Rubber Duck
Community Suggestions:
Queries on image clarity
Possible object grouping
Need for Further Research
Data is limited
Sent for external analysis
Encouraging viewers to continue sharing observations and hypotheses remains valuable. Additional research and peer review are needed to clarify ambiguous points, especially when video quality is poor or sensor artifacts could affect interpretation. Ongoing public engagement and scientific scrutiny are both critical in making progress on these cases.
